Measuring and Evaluating the User Experience Strategy Maturity of Spatial Web-Based Projects: A Case Study of Tehran Web-Based Map

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10272)


The design and implementation of spatial Web-based projects has been driving much research and development interest from the global community of practice over the past 10 years. The user centered evaluation of such projects outputs should be a vital part of the overall system development lifecycle. Continuously measuring and improving the User Experience (UX) of the output systems is a key factor driving better usage and enhanced user engagement.

Our research objective was first to track real-time and real-world usage of Tehran web based map, developed by TMICTO (Tehran Municipality ICT Organization), then to perform a usability test on selected tasks within a defined context of use and finally, to evaluate the UX strategy maturity of Tehran web based map based on existing maturity models.

We used mixed user research methods, including remote and on-site user research methods, to understand the context of use, usage behavior patterns in terms of actions and engagement, then we designed and performed usability testing and finally we evaluated the UX strategy maturity of Tehran web based map. Concrete and practical recommendations to improve the level of UX strategy maturity of Tehran web based map oriented towards short term, medium term and long term visions are formulated at the end of our research.


User experience (UX) UX strategy UX maturity Usability Spatial web-based projects 


  1. 1.
    UX and User Research Industry Survey Report 2017 by UserTesting. (2017). Accessed Feb 2017
  2. 2.
    Allanwood, G., Beare, P.: User Experience Design: Creating Designs Users Really Love. Bloomsbury, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bangor, A., Kortum, P., Miller, J.: Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale. J. Stud. 4(3), 114–123 (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bryan, P.: What is UX Strategy? (2014) Accessed Feb 2007
  5. 5.
    Myers, B.A.: The Encyclopedia of human-computer interaction. In: Soegaard, M., Dam, R.F. (eds.) The Interaction Design Foundation, 2nd edn. (2014). Accessed Feb 2017. ISBN 978-87-92964-00-7
  6. 6.
    Chapman, L., Plewes, S.: A UX maturity model: effective introduction of UX into organizations. In: Marcus, A. (ed.) DUXU 2014. LNCS, vol. 8520, pp. 12–22. Springer, Cham (2014). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-07638-6_2 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cousins, C.: Why Does User Experience Matter? (2013). Accessed Feb 2017
  8. 8.
    Harding, J.: Usability of geographic information e Factors identified from qualitative analysis of task-focused user interviews. Appl. Ergon. 44, 940–947 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ingensand, J., Golay, F.: Task-oriented usability evaluation of a WebGIS for a real-world community. URISA J. 22, 41–53 (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    ISO 9241-210: Ergonomics of human-system interaction – Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems. ISO (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kalbach, J.: UX Strategy Blueprint (2014). Accessed Feb 2017
  12. 12.
    Kelly, K.: What is Bounce Rate? Avoid Common Pitfalls (2012). Accessed Feb 2017
  13. 13.
    Lallemand, C., Gronier, G., Koenig, V.: User experience: a concept without consensus? exploring practitioners’ perspective through an international survey. Comput. Hum. Behav. 43, 35–48 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Levy, J.: UX Strategy: How to Devise Innovative Digital Products That People Want. O’Reilly Media (2015)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Miki, H.: Reconsidering the notion of user experience for human-centered design. In: Yamamoto, S. (ed.) HIMI 2013. LNCS, vol. 8016, pp. 329–337. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-39209-2_38 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nielsen, J.: Corporate UX Maturity: Stages 1–4. (2006). Accessed Feb 2017
  17. 17.
    Nielsen, J.: Corporate UX Maturity: Stages 5–8 (2006). Accessed Feb 2017
  18. 18.
    U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services. The Research-Based Web Design & Usability Guidelines, Enlarged/Expanded edition. Government Printing Office, Washington (2006) Accessed Feb 2017
  19. 19.
    Nivala, A., Sarjakoski, L., Sarjakoski, T.: Usability methods’ familiarity among map application developers. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 65, 784–795 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stern, C.: CUBI: A User Experience Model for Project Success (2014). Feb 2017
  21. 21.
    Bazargan, K., Kujala, T.: SIGCHI’s Iran chapter: empowering local HCI to create a better shared sociotechnical future. Interactions 23(2), 86 (2016). doi: 10.1145/2890102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Shahid Beheshti (National) University (of Iran)TehranIran

Personalised recommendations