Leaning-Based 360° Interfaces: Investigating Virtual Reality Navigation Interfaces with Leaning-Based-Translation and Full-Rotation
Despite recent advances in high quality Head-Mounted Displays (HMDs), designing locomotion interfaces for Virtual Reality (VR) is still challenging, and might contribute to unwanted side effects such as disorientation and motion sickness. To address these issues, we investigated the potentials of leaning-based 360° locomotion interfaces, which provide full-rotational motion cues (unlimited 360° rotations) for rotation, and leaning-based translational motion cues for forward/backward and sideways translation.
In this experiment we compared joystick with three locomotion interfaces: Real-Rotation (rotation control by an office swivel chair and forward/backward and sideways translations by joystick); Swivel-Chair (rotation control by the swivel chair and forward/backward and sideways control by leaning forward/backward and sideways on the chair respectively); NaviChair (rotation control by a sit/stand stool and forward/backward and sideway control by weight shifting and leaning in the same direction, which is sensed by a Nintendo’s Wii balance board pressure sensors the stool is mounted on).
We asked participants to follow an avatar in an unpredictable curvilinear path in a gamified experiment to evaluate interfaces in terms of different usability aspects, including accuracy, motion sickness, sensation of self-motion, presence, immersion, ease of use, ease of learning, engagement, enjoyment, overall preference, etc. Results did not show any significant advantages of our suggested interfaces over the joystick. But in a sense this is promising because in many aspects, the usability of the proposed interfaces was similar to the well-trained joystick. Moreover, our interfaces had slightly lower motion sickness ratings, and higher sensation of self-motion and spatial presence ratings than the joystick. However, they showed controllability issues, which resulted in significantly lower navigation accuracy (i.e., distance errors) and reduced control precision ratings, which made them less easy to use and comfortable than joystick.
We also discuss the participants’ qualitative feedbacks about our interfaces, which shows their strengths and weaknesses, and guide the design of more embodied future VR locomotion interfaces.
KeywordsVirtual reality Locomotion interface Leaning-based interface Motion sickness Disorientation
- 1.Beckhaus, S., Blom, K.J., Haringer, M.: Intuitive, hands-free travel interfaces for virtual environments. In: 2005 New Directions in 3D User Interfaces Workshop of IEEE VR, pp. 57–60 (2005)Google Scholar
- 6.Fairchild, K.M., Lee, B.H., Loo, J., Ng, H., Serra, L.: The heaven and earth virtual reality: Designing applications for novice users. In: Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, pp. 47–53, September 1993Google Scholar
- 7.Freiberg, J.: Experience Before Construction: Immersive Virtual Reality Design Tools for Architectural Practice (MSc Thesis). Simon Fraser University, Surrey, BC, Canada (2015)Google Scholar
- 8.Grechkin, T.Y., Riecke, B.E.: Re-evaluating benefits of body-based rotational cues for maintaining orientation in virtual environments: Men benefit from real rotations, women don’t. In: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Perception, New York, 99–102 (2014)Google Scholar
- 9.Groen, E.L., Bles, W.: How to use body tilt for the simulation of linear self motion. J. Vestib. Res.: Equilib. Orientation 14(5), 375–385 (2004)Google Scholar
- 10.Hale, K.S., Stanney, K.M., Keshavarz, B., Hecht, H., Lawson, B.D.: Visually induced motion sickness: Causes, characteristics, and countermeasures. In: Handbook of Virtual Environments: Design, Implementation, and Applications, pp. 647–698. CRC Press (2014). Second EditionGoogle Scholar
- 11.Harris, A., Nguyen, K., Wilson, P.T., Jackoski, M., Williams, B.: Human joystick: Wii-leaning to translate in large virtual environments. In: Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGGRAPH International Conference on Virtual-Reality Continuum and its Applications in Industry, New York, pp. 231–234 (2014)Google Scholar
- 12.Kitson, A., Hashemian, A.M., Stepanova, K., Riecke, B.E.: Comparing Leaning-Based Motion Cueing Interfaces for Virtual Reality Locomotion (2017)Google Scholar
- 13.Kitson, A., Riecke, B.E., Hashemian, A.M., Neustaedter, C.: NaviChair: Evaluating an embodied interface using a pointing task to navigate virtual reality. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction, New York, pp. 123–126 (2015)Google Scholar
- 14.Kruijff, E., Marquardt, A., Trepkowski, C., Lindeman, R.W., Hinkenjann, A., Maiero, J., Riecke, B.E.: On Your Feet! Enhancing Self-Motion Perception in Leaning-Based Interfaces through Multisensory Stimuli (2016)Google Scholar
- 15.Langbehn, E., Eichler, T., Ghose, S., von Luck, K., Bruder, G., Steinicke, F.: Evaluation of an omnidirectional walking-in-place user interface with virtual locomotion speed scaled by forward leaning angle. In: Proceedings of the GI Workshop on Virtual and Augmented Reality (GI VR/AR), pp. 149–160 (2015)Google Scholar
- 16.LaViola Jr., J.J., Feliz, D.A., Keefe, D.F., Zeleznik, R.C.: Hands-free multi-scale navigation in virtual environments. In: Proceedings of the 2001 Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, New York, pp. 9–15 (2001)Google Scholar
- 17.Lawson, B.D.: Motion sickness symptomatology and origins. In: Handbook of Virtual Environments: Design, Implementation, and Applications, pp. 531–599 (2014)Google Scholar
- 18.Marchal, M., Pettré, J., Lécuyer, A.: Joyman: A human-scale joystick for navigating in virtual worlds. In: 2011 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI), pp. 19–26, March 2011Google Scholar
- 20.Nguyen-Vo, T., Riecke, B.E., Stuerzlinger, W.: Moving in a Box: Improving Spatial Orientation in Virtual Reality using Simulated Reference Frames (2017)Google Scholar
- 22.Riecke, B.E.: Simple user-generated motion cueing can enhance self-motion perception (vection) in virtual reality. In: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, New York, pp. 104–107 (2006)Google Scholar
- 23.Riecke, B.E., Bodenheimer, B., McNamara, T.P., Williams, B., Peng, P., Feuereissen, D.: Do we need to walk for effective virtual reality navigation? Physical rotations alone may suffice. In: Hölscher, C., Shipley, T.F., Olivetti Belardinelli, M., Bateman, J.A., Newcombe, N.S. (eds.) Spatial Cognition 2010. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6222, pp. 234–247. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-14749-4_21 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Riecke, B.E., Feuereissen, D.: To move or not to move: can active control and user-driven motion cueing enhance self-motion perception (“Vection”) in virtual reality? In: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Perception, New York, pp. 17–24 (2012)Google Scholar
- 26.Riecke, B.E., Trepkowski, C., Kitson, A., Kruijff, E.: Human Joystick: Enhancing Self-Motion Perception (Linear Vection) by using Upper Body Leaning for Gaming and Virtual Reality (2017)Google Scholar
- 30.Sigurdarson, S., Milne, A.P., Feuereissen, D., Riecke, B.E.: Can physical motions prevent disorientation in naturalistic VR? In: 2012 IEEE Virtual Reality Workshops (VRW), pp. 31–34, March 2012Google Scholar
- 31.Wang, J., Lindeman, R.W.: Silver Surfer: A system to compare isometric and elastic board interfaces for locomotion in VR. In: 2011 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI), pp. 121–122, March 2011Google Scholar
- 32.Williams, B., Narasimham, G., McNamara, T.P., Carr, T.H., Rieser, J.J., Bodenheimer, B.: Updating orientation in large virtual environments using scaled translational gain. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization, New York, pp. 21–28 (2006)Google Scholar
- 33.Zielasko, D., Horn, S., Freitag, S., Weyers, B., Kuhlen, T.W.: Evaluation of hands-free HMD-based navigation techniques for immersive data analysis. In: 2016 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI), pp. 113–119, March 2016Google Scholar