DanMOOC: Enhancing Content and Social Interaction in MOOCs with Synchronized Commenting

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10281)

Abstract

To enhance interactions between learners, instructors, and content for MOOC courses, this study purposes a new video lecturing interface that embeds synchronized discussions and notes anchored to the video timeline. The design concept was evaluated with 4 MOOC instructors, 8 teaching assistants, and 7 learners using a prototype. Most participants agreed that the design would enhance learner-content, learner-learner, and learner-instructor interactions, and may further improve learning performance, satisfactions, and may decrease dropout rate. However, the form of presenting discussions and possibly unrelated content may distract learners, and the design requires further improvement.

Keywords

E-learning MOOC Online video interface Synchronized commenting 

References

  1. 1.
    Downes, S.: Half an Hour: Connectivist Dynamics in Communities. Half Hour (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    He, W.: Examining students’ online interaction in a live video streaming environment using data mining and text mining. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29, 90–102 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Finnegan, C., Morris, L.V., Lee, K.: Differences by course discipline on student behavior, persistence, and achievement in online courses of undergraduate general education. J. Coll. Stud. Retent. Res. Theory Pract. 10, 39–54 (2009). doi:10.2190/CS.10.1.d CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gillani, N., Eynon, R.: Communication patterns in massively open online courses. Internet High Educ. 23, 18–26 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Borokhovski, E., Bernard, R.M., Tamim, R.M., et al.: Technology-supported student interaction in post-secondary education: a meta-analysis of designed versus contextual treatments. Comput. Educ. 96, 15–28 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Adamopoulos, P.: What makes a great MOOC? An interdisciplinary analysis of student retention in online courses, pp. 4720–4740 (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Khalil, H., Ebner, M., Herrington, J.: How satisfied are you with your MOOC? - A research study on interaction in huge online courses. In: Actas AACE World Conference Educational Multimedia Hypermedia Telecommunications, Victoria, pp. 830–839 (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Castaño, C., Maiz, I., Garay, U.: Design, motivation and performance in a cooperative MOOC course. Online Submiss. 22, 19–26 (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kuo, Y.C., Walker, A.E., Belland, B.R., Schroder, K.E.E.: A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distance Learn 14, 107–127 (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ke, F., Kwak, D.: Online learning across ethnicity and age: a study on learning interaction participation, perception, and learning satisfaction. Comput. Educ. 61, 43–51 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hew, K.F., Cheung, W.S.: Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): motivations and challenges. Educ. Res. Rev. 12, 45–58 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kim, J., Guo, P.J., Cai, C.J., et al.: Data-driven interaction techniques for improving navigation of educational videos. In: Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pp. 563–572. ACM, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yousef, A.M.F., Chatti, M.A., Schroeder, U., Wosnitza, M.: A usability evaluation of a blended MOOC environment: an experimental case study. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 16 (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chen, Y., Gao, Q., Rau, P.-L.P.: Watching a movie alone yet together: understanding reasons for watching Danmaku videos. Int. J. Hum.–Comput. Interact. (2017)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lee, Y.-C., Lin, W.-C., Cherng, F.-Y., et al. Using time-anchored peer comments to enhance social interaction in online educational videos. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 689–698. ACM, New York (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Industrial EngineeringTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations