Advertisement

The Management of the Mycorrhizal Soil Infectivity: Ecological and Technical Approaches

  • Adrien Lies
  • Yves Prin
  • Robin DuponnoisEmail author
  • Hicham Ferhout
Chapter

Abstract

Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi have a large potential to help increase global food security. They constitute the most important microbial symbiosis for the majority of terrestrial plant species. Their ecological functions in the productivity and stability of agroecosystems have been recognized for many years. Many studies have shown that these symbionts improved plant growth and plant resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses. Despite the proven potential of mycorrhizal symbiosis to sustainably improve the productivity of agroecosystems, this biotechnology is still under exploited. This failure mainly results from technical difficulties to mass-produced fungal inoculum of high quality and a lack of knowledge about the biological factors regulating the soil receptivity of arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculation. In order to promote mycorrhizal soil infectivity, two main approaches could be considered: (1) the “reductionist” approach that consists to add into the soil, a large quantity of fungal propagules of a specialized AMF and (2) the “holistic” approach that aims to conserve and restore native AMF diversity and abundance. In this chapter, we will examine the environmental factors that affect the mycorrhizal diversity and abundance and limit both approaches as they can both be of interest, trying to explain to what environmental solution they would be more adapted.

References

  1. Abbott LK, Robson AD (1982) The role of vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in agriculture and the selection of fungi for inoculation. Aust J Agric Res 33:389–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Babana AH, Antoun H (2006) Effect of Tilemsi phosphate rock-solubilizing microorganisms on phosphorus uptake and yield of field-grown wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in Mali. Plant Soil 287:51–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bécard G, Fortin JA (1988) Early events of vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhiza formation on Ri T-DNA transformed roots. New Phytol 108:211–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennett AE, Daniell TJ, White PJ (2013) Benefits of breeding crops for yield response to soil microorganisms. In: de Bruijn FJ (ed) Molecular ecology of the rhizosphere. Wiley, New York, NY, pp 17–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burrows RL, Pfleger FL (2002) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi respond to increasing plant diversity. Can J Bot 80:120–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Celebi SZ, Demir S, Celebi R, Durak ED, Yilmaz IH (2010) The effect of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) applications on the silage maize (Zea mays L.) yield in different irrigation regimes. Eur J Soil Biol 46:302–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Conversa G, Lazzizera C, Bonasia A, Elia A (2013) Yield and phosphorus uptake of a processing tomato crop grown at different phosphorus levels in a calcareous soil as affected by mycorrhizal inoculation under field conditions. Biol Fertil Soils 49:691–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Declerck S, Strullu DG, Plenchette C (1996) In vitro mass-production of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus, Glomus versiforme, associated with Ri T-DNA transformed carrot roots. Mycol Res 100:1237–1242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duponnois R, Garbaye J (1991) Effect of dual inoculation of Douglas fir with the ectomycorrhizal fungus Laccaria laccata and mycorrhization helper bacteria (MHB) in two bare root forest nurseries. Plant Soil 138:169–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Duponnois R, Ouahmane L, Kane A, Thioulouse J, Hafidi M, Boumezzough A, Prin Y, Baudoin E, Galiana A, Dreyfus B (2011) Nurse shrubs increased the early growth of Cupressus seedlings by enhancing. Soil Biol Biochem 43:2160–2168Google Scholar
  11. Duponnois R, Ramanankierana H, Hafidi M, Baohanta R, Baudoin E, Thioulouse J, Sanguin H, Bâ AM, Galiana A, Bally R, Lebrun M, Prin Y (2013) Native plant resources to optimize the performances of forest rehabilitation in Mediterranean and tropical environment : some examples of nursing plant species that improve the soil mycorrhizal potential. C R Biol 336:265–272CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Del Fabbro C, Prati D (2014) Early responses of wild plant seedlings to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and pathogens. Basic Appl Ecol 15:534–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eom AH, Hartnett DC, Wilson GWT (2000) Host plant species effects on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities in tallgrass prairie. Oecologia 122:435–444CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Fester T, Sawers R (2011) Progress and challenges in agricultural applications of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Crit Rev Plant Sci 30:459–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Franco AD, Ortiz FEC, Contreras MGL, Santacruz GAA, Cabrera OAG (2013) Growth, mineral absorption and yield of maize inoculated with microbe strains. Afr J Agric Res 8:3764–3769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gamalero E, Trotta A, Massa N, Copetta A, Martinotti MG, Berta G (2004) Impact of two fluorescent pseudomonads and an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus on tomato plant growth, root architecture and P acquisition. Mycorrhiza 14:185–192CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Germani G, Plenchette C (2004) Potential of Crotalaria species as green manure crops for the management of pathogenic nematodes and beneficial mycorrhizal fungi. Plant Soil 266:333–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gianinazzi-Pearson V, Gianinazzi S, Trouvelot A (1985) Evaluation of the infectivity and the effectiveness of indigenous vesicular-arbuscular fungal populations in some agricultural soils in Burgundy. Can J Bot 63:1521–1524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Godfray HCJ, Beddington JR, Crute IR, Haddad L, Lawrence D, Muir JF et al (2010) Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327:812–818CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hagh ED, Mirshekari B, Ardakani MR, Farahvash F, Rejali F (2016) Optimizing phosphorus use in sustainable maize cropping via mycorrhizal inoculation. J Plant Nutr 39:1348–1356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hart MM, Reader RJ (2002) Taxonomic basis for variation in the colonization strategy of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol 153:335–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Haselwandter K, Bowen GD (1996) Mycorrhizal relations in trees for agroforestry and land rehabilitation. For Ecol Manag 81:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Van der Heijden MGA, Klironomos JN, Ursic M, Moutoglis P, Streitwolf-Engel R, Boller T, Wiemken A, Sanders IR (1998) Mycorrhizal fungal diversity determines plant bio-diversity, ecosystem variability and productivity. Nature 396:69–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ijdo M, Cranenbrouck S, Declerck S (2011) Methods for large-scale production of AM fungi: past, present and future. Mycorrhiza 21:1–16CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Jakobsen I, Gazey C, Abbott LK (2001) Phosphate transfert by communities of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in intact soil cores. New Phytol 149:95–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jeffries P, Gianinazzi S, Perotto S, Turanu K, Barea M (2003) The contribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in sustainable maintenance of plant health and soil fertility. Biol Fertil Soils 37:1–16Google Scholar
  27. Johnson D, Vandenkoornhuyse PJ, Leake JR, Gilbert L, Booth RE, Grime JP, Young PW, Read DJ (2004) Plant communities affect arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal diversity and community composition in grassland microcosms. New Phytol 161:503–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Karasawa T, Takebe M (2011) Temporal or spatial arrangements of cover crops to promote arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization and P uptake of upland crops grown after nonmycorrhizal crops. Plant Soil 353:355–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kaya C, Higgs D, Kirnak H, Tas I (2003) Mycorrhizal colonization improves fruit yield and water use efficiency in water (Citrullus lanatus Thunb.) grown under well-watered and water-stressed conditions. Plant Soil 253:287–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Klironomos JN (2003) Variation in plant response to native and exotic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Ecology 84:2292–2301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Klironomos JN, Zobel M, Tibbett M, Stock WD, Rillig MC, Parrent JL, Moora M, Koch AM, Facelli JM, Facilli E, Dickie IA, Bever JD (2011) Forces the structure plant communities: quantifying the importance of the mycorrhizal symbiosis. New Phytol 189:366–370CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Koch AM, Kuhn G, Fontanillas P, Fumagalli L, Goudet J, Sanders JR (2004) High genetic variability and low local diversity in a population of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:2369–2374CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Koorem K, Saks U, Söber V, Uibopuu A, Opik M, Zobel M, Moora M (2012) Effects of arbuscular mycorrhiza on community composition and seedling recruitment in temperate forest understory. Basic Appl Ecol 13:663–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Li H, Wang C, Li X, Xiang D (2013) Inoculating maize fields with earthworms (Aporrectodea trapezoids) and an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (Rhizophagus intraradices) improves mycorrhizal community structure and increases plant nutrient uptake. Biol Fertil Soils 49:1167–1178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Malusá E, Sas-Paszt L, Ciesielska J (2012) Technologies for beneficial microorganisms inocula used as biofertilizers. Sci World J:1–12Google Scholar
  36. Medina-Gonzales OA, Sylvia DM, Jr K (1987) Growth response of tropical forage legumes to inoculation with Glomus intraradices. Trop Grasslands 21:24–27Google Scholar
  37. Van Noordwijk M, Lawson G, Soumaré A, Groot JJR, Hairiah K (1996) Root distribution of trees and crops: competition and/or complementary. In: Ong CK, Huxley PW (eds) Tree-crop interactions: a physiological approach. CAB International, Wallington, UK, pp 319–364Google Scholar
  38. Oehl F, Laczko E, Bogenrieder A, Stahr K, Bosch R, Van der Heijden MGA, Sieverding E (2010) Soil type and land use intensity determine the composition of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities. Soil Biol Biochem 42:724–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Opik M, Moora M, Liira J, Zobel M (2006) Composition of root colonizing arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities in different ecosystems around the globe. J Ecol 94:778–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pellegrino E, Bedini S, Avio L, Bonari E, Giovanetti M (2011) Field inoculation effectiveness of native and exotic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a Mediterranean soil. Soil Biol Biochem 43:367–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ratti N, Kumar S, Verma HN, Gautam SP (2001) Improvement in bioavailability of tricalcium phosphate to Cymbopognon matinii var. motia by rhizobacteria, AMF and Azospirillum inoculation. Microbiol Res 156:145–149CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Rodriguez A, Sanders IR (2015) The role of community and population ecology in applying mycorrhizal fungi for improved food security. ISME J 9:1053–1061CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Smith SE, Read DJ (2008) The mycorrhizal symbiosis. Academic Press, San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
  44. Suri VK, Choudhary K, Chander G, Verma TS (2011) Influence of vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and applied phosphorus on root colonization in wheat and plant nutrient dynamics in a phosphorus-deficient acid alfisol of Western Himalayas. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 42(10):1177–1186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tilman D, Cassman KG, Matson PA, Naylor R, Polasky S (2002) Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418:671–677CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Tisserand E, Malbreil M, Kuo A, Kohler A, Symeonidi A, Balestrini R et al (2013) Genome of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus provides insight into the oldest plant symbiosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:20117–20122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vandenkoornhuyse P, Quaiser A, Duhamel M, Le Van A, Dufresne A (2015) The importance of the microbiome of the plant holobiont. New Phytol 206:1196–1206CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Vandermeer JH (1989) The ecology of intercropping. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Verbruggen E, Röling WFM, Gamper HA, Kowalchuk GA, Verhoef HA, Van der Heijden MGA (2010) Positive effects of organing farming on below-ground mutualists: large-scale comparison of mycorrhizal fungal communities in agricultural soils. New Phytol 186:968–979CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Vessey KJ (2003) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers. Plant Soil 255:571–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wahbi S, Prin Y, Maghraoui T, Sanguin H, Thioulouse J, Oufdou K, Hafidi M, Duponnois R (2015) Field application of the mycorrhizal fungus rhizophagus irregularis increases the yield of wheat crop and affects soil microbial functionalities. Am J Plant Sci 6:3205–3215CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adrien Lies
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yves Prin
    • 3
  • Robin Duponnois
    • 2
    Email author
  • Hicham Ferhout
    • 1
  1. 1.AGRONUTRITIONCarbonneFrance
  2. 2.IRD, UMR LSTMMontpellierFrance
  3. 3.CIRAD, UMR LSTMMontpellierFrance

Personalised recommendations