Skip to main content

The Walkability Planning Support System: An Evidence-Based Tool to Design Healthy Communities

Part of the Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography book series (LNGC)

Abstract

A major challenge for all cities is to reconcile growth with cultural, social and environmental considerations, along with connecting urban design with opportunities for health and wellbeing. Planning Support Systems (PSSs) can facilitate future planning and foster collaboration between researchers and urban planners in promoting healthy built environments. The Walkability PSS was developed specially for that purpose. This chapter presents an evaluation of the Walkability PSS, a PSS for building planning scenarios and assessing their impacts on walking behaviours. The evaluation was conducted in collaboration with a group of local urban planners. The study results show that the Walkability PSS could support planners in several situations including testing and comparing planning scenarios for greenfield and brownfield areas, conducting consultation and/or workshops with various stakeholders and making decisions about the provision of new infrastructure .

Keywords

  • Planning Support System
  • Walkability
  • Healthy cities
  • Participatory planning
  • Co-design

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-57819-4_9
  • Chapter length: 13 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-319-57819-4
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Arciniegas, G., Geertman, S., & de Kroes, J. (2013). Using MapTable® to learn about sustainable urban development. In S. Geertman, F. Toppen, & J. Stillwell (Eds.). Planning support systems for sustainable urban development Heodelberg: Springer-Verlag, pp. 167–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badland, H., & Schofield, G. (2005). The built environment and transport-related physical activity: What we do and do not know. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 2(4), 433–442.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Christian, H., Bull, F., Middleton, N., Knuiman, M., Divitini, M., Hooper, P., Amarasinghe, A., & Giles-Corti, B. (2011). How important is the land use mix measure in understanding walking behaviour? Results from the RESIDE study. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 8(55), doi:10.1186/1479-5868-1188-1155.

  • Creutzig, F., Baiocchi, G., Bierkandt, R., Pichler, P.-P., & Seto, K. C. (2015). Global typology of urban energy use and potentials for an urbanization mitigation wedge. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(20), 6283–6288.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Eichinger, M., Titze, S., Haditsch, B., Dorner, T. E., & Stronegger, W. J. (2015). How are physical activity behaviors and cardiovascular risk factors associated with characteristics of the built and social residential environment? PLoS ONE, 10(6), e0126010.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, L. D., Sallis, J. F., Conway, T. L., Chapman, J. E., Saelens, B. E., & Bachman, W. (2006). Many pathways from land use to health: Associations between neighborhood walkability and active transportation, body mass index, and air quality. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(1), 75–87.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Geertman, S., & Stillwell, J. (2004). Planning support systems: An inventory of current practice. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 28(4), 291–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodspeed, R. (2016). Sketching and learning: A planning support system field study. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 43(3), 444–463.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, L. D., Ramanathan, R., & Pallathucheril, V. G. (2004). Interface for a sketch-planning workbench. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 28(6), 653–666.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, M., Boulange, C., & Giles-Corti, B. (2014). Urban design and health: Progress to date and future challenges. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 25(1), 14–18.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pelzer, P., Arciniegas, G., Geertman, S., & Lenferink, S. (2015). Planning support systems and task-technology fit: A comparative case study. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 8(2), 155–175.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pelzer, P., Geertman, S., van der Heijden, R., & Rouwette, E. (2014). The added value of planning support systems: A practitioner’s perspective. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 48, 16–27.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Saelens, B. E., Sallis, J. F., & Frank, L. D. (2003). Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 25(2), 80–91.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sallis, J. F., Cerin, E., Conway, T. L., Adams, M. A., Frank, L. D., Pratt, M., et al. (2016). Physical activity in relation to urban environments in 14 cities worldwide: A cross-sectional study. The Lancet, 387(10034), 2207–2217.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • State Government Victoria (2014). Plan Melbourne. Metropolitan planning strategy 2014. Melbourne: State Government Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulmer, J. M., Chapman, J. E., Kershaw, S. E., Campbell, M., & Frank, L. D. (2015). Application of an evidence-based tool to evaluate health impacts of changes to the built environment. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 106(1 Suppl 1), eS26–34, doi:10.17269/cjph.106.4338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyck, D., Cardon, G., Deforche, B., Owen, N., & De Bourdeaudhuij, I. (2011). Relationships between neighborhood walkability and adults’ physical activity: How important is residential self-selection? Health Place, 17(4), 1011–1014.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Vonk, G., Geertman, S., & Schot, P. (2005). Bottlenecks blocking widespread usage of planning support systems. Environment and planning A, 37(5), 909–924.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Vonk, G., Geertman, S., & Schot, P. (2007). A SWOT analysis of planning support systems. Environment and Planning A, 39(7), 1699–1714.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Waddell, P. (2011). Integrated land use and transportation planning and modelling: Addressing challenges in research and practice. Transport Reviews, 31(2), 209–229.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, P., Smith, K. R., Beevers, S., Tonne, C., & Oreszczyn, T. (2007). Energy, energy efficiency, and the built environment. The lancet, 370(9593), 1175–1187.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, F., Stevens, D., O’Connor-Duffany, K., Siegel, K., & Gao, Y. (2011). Community health environment scan survey (CHESS): A novel tool that captures the impact of the built environment on lifestyle factors. Global Health Action, 4, doi:10.3402/gha.v4i0.5276.

  • World Health Organization. (1986). Ottawa charter for health promotion: First international conference on health promotion, Ottawa, 21 November 1986 (International Conference on Health Promotion). Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2010). Hidden cities: Unmasking and overcoming health inequities in urban settings. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claire Boulange .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Boulange, C., Pettit, C., Giles-Corti, B. (2017). The Walkability Planning Support System: An Evidence-Based Tool to Design Healthy Communities. In: Geertman, S., Allan, A., Pettit, C., Stillwell, J. (eds) Planning Support Science for Smarter Urban Futures. CUPUM 2017. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57819-4_9

Download citation