Abstract
A lack of integration in transport and land use modelling systems has been a major handicap for strategic planning operations in many cities; hence there is a need for a more interactive , flexible and accurate system that can meet various sustainable planning objectives. This chapter discusses the theoretical development of the relationship between transport and land use models. Previous practices show that a combination of bid-rent theory and random utility theory would provide mutual benefits for transport and land use models. Bid-rent models provide the location of activities with households and firms, which helps the estimation of random utility mode choice models in transport models. In turn, the output of transport models can be used to measure accessibility in land use models. This chapter also highlights the importance of using data base manager to include Revealed Preference data, Stated Preference data and Bluetooth data. Two current practices in Adelaide and Perth are analyzed. The application of a combined bid-rent theory and utility function theory are proposed for future empirical studies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alonso, W. (1964). Location and land use. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Anas, A. (1983). Discrete choice theory, information theory and the multinomial logit and gravity models. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 17(1), 13–23. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0191261583900231
Bhaskar, A., & Chung, E. (2013). Fundamental understanding on the use of Bluetooth scanner as a complementary transport data. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 37, 42–72.
Bhat, C. R. (1998). Accommodating variations in responsiveness to level-of-service measures in travel mode choice modeling. Transportation Research Part A, 32(7), 495–507.
Biermann, S., Olaru, D., Taplin, J. H., & Taylor, M. A. P. (2015). Pragmatic incremental or courageous leapfrog [Re] development of a land-use and transport modelling system for Perth, Australia. In S. Geertman et al. (Eds.), Planning Support Systems and Smart Cities (pp. 489–506). New York: Springer.
Bowman, C., & Ambrosini, V. (2000). Value creation versus value capture: Towards a coherent definition of value in strategy. British Journal of Management, 11(1), 1–15.
Bradley, M. A., & Koffman, D. (2012). Improving ADA Paratransit Demand Estimation: Regional Modeling. Transportation Research Board.
Chaaraoui, A. A., Climent-Pérez, P., & Flórez-Revuelta, F. (2012). A review on vision techniques applied to human behaviour analysis for ambient-assisted living. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(12), 10873–10888.
Chang, J. S. (2006). Models of the relationship between transport and land-use: A review. Transport Reviews, 26(3), 325–350.
Chang, J. S., & Mackett, R. L. (2006). A bi-level model of the relationship between transport and residential location. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 40(2), 123–146.
Citilabs. (2015). http://www.citilabs.com Mountain View. California, USA.
Domencich, T. A., & McFadden, D. (1975). Urban travel demand-a behavioral analysis. North-Holland & American Elsevier. Oxford and New York. http://emlab.berkeley.edu/~mcfadden/travel/front.pdf
Earnhart, D. (2002). Combining revealed and stated data to examine housing decisions using discrete choice analysis. Journal of Urban Economics, 51(1), 143–169. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094119001922417
Ellickson, B. (1981). An alternative test of the hedonic theory of housing markets. Journal of Urban Economics, 9(1), 56–79.
Government of South Australia. (2013). Setting directions and coordinating outcomes: Integrating transport. http://www.thinkdesigndeliver.sa.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/139613/Setting_Directions_and_Coordinating_outcomes_Integrating_Transport.pdf
Gross, D. J. (1988). Estimating willingness to pay for housing characteristics: An application of the Ellickson bid-rent model. Journal of Urban Economics, 24(1), 95–112.
Hamin, E. M., & Gurran, N. (2009). Urban form and climate change: Balancing adaptation and mitigation in the U.S. and Australia. Habitat International, 33(3), 238–245. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197397508000659
Hanley, N., & Spash, C. L. (1993). Cost-benefit analysis and the environment. Edward Elgar Cheltenham.
Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M., & Greene, W. H. (2005). Applied choice analysis: A primer. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Holyoak, N., Taylor, M. A. P., Oxlad, L., & Gregory, J. (2005). Development of a new strategic transport planning model for Adelaide. Papers of the 28th Australasian Transport Research Forum, Sydney. http://patrec.org/atrf.aspx
Hunt, J. D. (1997). A description of the MEPLAN framework for land use and transport interaction modelling. University of Calgary.
Hunt, J. D., Kriger, D. S., & Miller, E. J. (2005). Current operational urban land-use–transport modelling frameworks: A review. Transport Reviews, 25(3), 329–376.
Iacono, M., Levinson, D., & El-Geneidy, A. (2008). Models of transportation and land use change: a guide to the territory. Journal of Planning Literature, 22(4), 323–340.
Kii, M., & Doi, K. (2005). Multiagent land-use and transport model for the policy evaluation of a compact city. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 32(4), 485–504.
Kleinhans, R. (2004). Social implications of housing diversification in urban renewal: A review of recent literature. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 19(4), 367–390.
Lee, J. D. B. (1973). Requiem for large-scale models. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 39(3), 163–178.
Lerman, S. R. (1976). Location, housing, automobile ownership, and mode to work: A joint choice model. Transportation Research Record, 610, 6–11.
Lerman, S. R., & Kern, C. R. (1983). Hedonic theory, bid rents, and willingness-to-pay: Some extensions of Ellicksons results. Journal of Urban Economics, 13(3), 358–363.
Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., & Swait, J. D. (2000). Stated choice methods: Analysis and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Martínez, F. (1996). MUSSA: Land use model for Santiago city. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1552(1), 126–134. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/1552-18 http://trb.metapress.com/content/u35602wp7uw367m3/fulltext.pdf
Martinez, F. J. (1992). The bid—choice land-use model: An integrated economic framework. Environment and Planning A, 24(6), 871–885.
McFadden, D. (1974a). The measurement of urban travel demand. Journal of Public Economics, 3(4), 303–328. http://pigpen.utc.uic.edu/pigpen/kazuya/UPP560/Wk7/McFadden_The_Measurement_of_Urban_Travel_Demand.pdf
McFadden, D. (1974b). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. In P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in econometrics (pp. 105–142). New York: Academic Press.
Medda, F. (2012). Land value capture finance for transport accessibility: A review. Journal of Transport Geography, 25(11), 154–161. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692312002116
Meng, L., Somenahalli, S., Allan, A., Pieters, J., Deng, X., Wilson, J., & Zuffery, C. (2016). Integrated transport and land use modelling for Metropolitan Adelaide. University of South Australia.
Meng, L., Taylor, M. A. P., & Scrafton, D. (2016). Combining latent class models and gis models for integrated transport and land use planning—A case study application. Urban Policy and Research, 1–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2015.1118372
Miyamoto, K., & Udomsri, R. (1996). An analysis system for integrated policy measures regarding land-use, transport and the environment in a metropolis. Transport, Land-Use and the Environment (pp. 259–280). New York: Springer.
Ortúzar, Jd D., & Willumsen, L. G. (2002). Modelling transport (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Putman, S. (1983). Integrated Urban Models. London: Pio Limited.
Rosen, S. (1974). Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy, 82(1), 34–55.
Roy, B. (1991). The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods. Theory and Decision, 31(1), 49–73.
Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 9–26. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/037722179090057I.
Sermons, M. W., & Seredich, N. (2001). Assessing traveler responsiveness to land and location based accessibility and mobility solutions. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 6(6), 417–428.
Southworth, F. (1995). A technical review of urban land use–transportation models as tools for evaluating vehicle travel reduction strategies.
Suzuki, H., Cervero, R., & Iuchi, K. (2013). Transforming cities with transit: Transit and land-use integration for sustainable urban development. World Bank Publications.
Taplin, J., Taylor, M. A. P., & Biermann, S. (2015). Transport modelling review. Planning and Transport Research Centre (PATREC).
Taylor, M. A. P. (1991). Traffic planning by a “Desktop Expert”. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 15(3), 165–177.
Taylor, M. A. P., & Scrafton, D. (2003). Travel demand modelling for metropolitan Adelaide report to the SA department of transport and urban planning, Transport System Centre.
Thompson, W. R. (1965). Preface to urban economics. United States: Johns Hopkins Press.
Train, K. E. (2003). Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Waddell, P. (1993). Exogenous workplace choice in residential location models: Is the assumption valid? Geographical Analysis, 25(1), 65–82.
Waddell, P. (2002). UrbanSim: Modeling urban development for land use, transportation, and environmental planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 68(3), 297–314. http://www.urbansim.org/pub/Research/ResearchPapers/UrbanSim-JAPA.pdf
Waddell, P., & Ulfarsson, G. F. (2004). Introduction to urban simulation: Design And Development of Operational.
Wegener, M. (1982). Modeling urban decline: A multilevel economic-demographic model for the Dortmund region. International Regional Science Review, 7(2), 217–241.
Wegener, M. (1994). Operational urban models state of the art. Journal of the American Planning Association, 60(1), 17–29.
Wilson, A. G. (1967). A statistical theory of spatial distribution models. Transportation Research, 1(3), 253–269.
Woolcock, M. (1998). Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and society, 27(2), 151–208.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Meng, L., Allan, A., Somenahalli, S. (2017). Investigating Theoretical Development for Integrated Transport and Land Use Modelling Systems. In: Geertman, S., Allan, A., Pettit, C., Stillwell, J. (eds) Planning Support Science for Smarter Urban Futures. CUPUM 2017. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57819-4_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57819-4_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57818-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57819-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)