Skip to main content

The Urban as a Concrete Utopia? Co-production and Local Governance in Distinct Urban Geographies: Transnational Learning from Chile and Germany

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: The Urban Book Series ((UBS))

Abstract

Reflecting on empirical material from Chile and Germany, this chapter combines practical insights for an analysis of co-productive urban projects with the aim to generate insights for the ‘right to the city’, a concept that has travelled from Europe to North and later Latin America . We argue not only for different avenues to understand the right to the city, but also emphasise that there is a need to reflect on how the concept has been reformulated by different local interactions. Emphasis is placed on how civil society actors are locally connected to their cities—in our case mainly Berlin and Santiago , while at the same time engaged in networks of collaboration and knowledge exchange via ‘encounters’. In this chapter, reflections on encounters allow shedding light on emerging struggles but also negotiation practices between different actors in the co-production processes. Co-productive practices might certainly entail a risk of underestimating broader structural changes in urban development —which, at times, resonate with neoliberal individualism. Yet, our findings also reveal that such practices bring to light important elements of the right to the city, especially claims for being within the urban core and democratic engagement in city-building. Drawing on Henri Lefebvre’s terminology we, hence, argue that these practices reflect the right to centrality and the right to participation; they represent encounters that emerge in constant struggle, contestation and negotiation processes. Understood like this, the urban becomes a concrete utopia—a possibility, a promise to be constantly produced and reproduced.

This chapter is based on the authors’ research projects: ‘Ansätze von koproduzierter Stadtentwicklung und ihr Einfluss auf die Entwicklung von sozial-inklusiven Stadträumen—ein internationaler Vergleich von Theorie und Praxis’, preperation studies for the DFG Reseach Project, 2018–2021, TU-Berlin; ‘Spatial capital, social complexity of the rent gap formation, and social stratification: a comparative analysis of gentrification in Santiago, Buenos Aires, Rio de Janeiro and Mexico City, 2005–2017’ (Fondecyt Chile, Project #1151287); and the Centre of Conflict and Social Cohesion Studies (Conicyt Fondap #15130009). It also draws on findings from consultancies by uLab for several urban projects in Berlin (Initiative RAW. Kulturensemble; Ostkreuz Initiativen Netzwerk). Data was obtained through discourse analysis and comparative case studies in different German cities (e.g. Berlin, Leipzig and Hamburg) and Santiago de Chile (Estación Central comuna), involving municipalities, planners, various actors in civil society related to local urban development, and through consultation and monitoring of collaborative projects within local communities and the private sector. In both cases, the work concentrated on the processes of adaptation and transformation, which is accompanied by in-depth research on development approaches that initiate new forms of collaboration, local economies and local learning processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Not In My Back Yard (NIMBY).

  2. 2.

    http://infoinvi.uchilefau.cl/por-que-en-chile-falta-medio-millon-de-viviendas/

References

  • Alfaro d’Alençon P, Bauerfeind B, Konrad D (2017) Ephemere Stadtentwicklung. Handbuch und Planungshilfe. DOM Publishers, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Aravena A, Iacobelli A (2013) Elemental: incremental housing and participatory design manual (Bilingual edition). Hatje Cantz, Ostfildern

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop P, Williams L (2012) The temporary city. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovaird T, Loeffler E (2012) From engagement to co-production: the contribution of users and communities to outcomes and public value. VOLUNTAS: J Voluntary Nonprofit Organ 23(4):1119–1138

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner N (2016) Critique of urbanization: selected essays. Birkhaeuser, Basel

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Buttenberg L, Overmeyer K, Spars G (2014) Raumunternehmen: Wie Nutzer selbst Räume entwickeln. Jovis Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Castillo Couve M (2011) Producción y gestión habitacional de los pobladores. La autogestión de vivienda en Peñalolén y La Pintana, Santiago de Chile. Boletín CF + S, 54, 133–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Cociña C, López-Morales E (2017) Unpacking narratives of social conflict and inclusion: anti-gentrification neighbourhood organisation in Santiago, Chile. In: Rokem J, Boano C (eds) Urban geopolitics: rethinking planning in contested cities. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • de Souza M (2010) Which right to which city? in defence of political-strategic clarity. Interface J Soc Mov 2(1):315–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Dellenbaugh M, Kip M, Bienoik M, Müller A, Schwegmann M (2015) Urban commons: moving beyond state and market. Birkhaeuser, Basel

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-Parra I, Rabasco-Pozuelo P (2013) Revitalización sin gentrificación? Cooperativas de vivienda por ayuda mutua en los centros de Buenos Aires y Montevideo. Cuadernos Geográficos 52(2):99–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Dohnke J (2013) Spree Riverbanks for everyone! What remains of “Sink Mediaspree”?. In: Bernt M, Grell B and Holm A (eds) The Berlin reader. A compendium on urban change and activism. Transcript Verlag, Berlin, pp 261–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández V (2012) Participación Ciudadana en Diseño Urbano: promoviendo una ciudad más inclusiva. Revista de Urbanismo 27:92–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Ffrench-Davis R (2004) Entre el neoliberalismo y el crecimiento con equidad: tres décadas de política económica en Chile. Siglo XXI, Buenos Aires

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank AG (1976) Economic genocide in Chile: monetary theory versus humanity: two open letters to Arnold Harberger and Milton Friedman. Spokesman Books, Nottingham

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs O, Fürst D, Rohr-Zänker R (2002) Neue Kooperationsformen in der Stadtentwicklung. Auftakt zum neuen Forschungsfeld im Experimentellen Wohnungs- und Städtebau. Bundesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Galetovic A, Poduje I, Sanhueza R (2009) Malles en Santiago de centros comerciales a centros urbanos. Estudios Públicos 114:219–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Garretón M (2014) Derecho a la ciudad y partici- pación frente al centralismo en Chile. Revista 180(34):4–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerkens K (2013) Stadtumbaukultur – Was können wir vom Osten lernen. Amt für Stadterneuerung und Wohnungsbauförderung, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith R (1998) Making sameness: place marketing and the new urban entrepreneurialism. In: Oatley N (ed) Cities, economic competition and urban policy. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Harpham T, Boateng K (1997) Urban governance in relation to the operation of urban services in developing countries. Habitat Int 21(1):65–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey D (2003) The right to the city. Int J Urban Reg Res 27(4):939–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haydn F, Temel R (eds) (2006) Temporary urban spaces: concepts for the use of city spaces. Birkhauser, Basel

    Google Scholar 

  • Heeg S, Rosol M (2007) Neoliberale Stadtpolitik im globalen Kontext. Prokla, Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialwissenschaft 37(4):491–509

    Google Scholar 

  • Helfrich S (2012) Commons. Für eine neue Politik jenseits von Markt und Staat. Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsen M (2012) Can government initiatives increase citizen coproduction? results of a randomized field experiment. J Public Adm Res Theor 23(1):27–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi A, Moore M (2004) Institutionalised co-production: unorthodox public service delivery in challenging environments. J Dev Stud 40(4):31–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langhagen-Rohrbach C (2010) Raumordnung und Landesplanung. Wiss. Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt

    Google Scholar 

  • Lees L, Shin HB, Lopez-Morales E (2016) Planetary gentrification. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre H (2003[1970]) The urban revolution, 1st edn. Univ of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • López-Morales E (2016) A multidimensional approach to urban entrepreneurialism, financialization, and gentrification in the high-rise residential market of inner Santiago, Chile. In: Soederberg S (ed) Risking capitalism (Research in political economy, Vol 31, 79–105). Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley

    Google Scholar 

  • López Morales E, Ruiz-Tagle J, Marín H, Orozco H, Meza D (2017) ¿”Guetos verticales” o gentrificación? Resultados de encuesta panel de re-estratificación social de los barrios centrales de Santiago. Seminario en Facultad de Arquitectura y Urbanismo, Universidad de Chile, Santiago

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse P (2014) Reading the right to the city. City 18(1):4–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer M (2009) The “Right to the City” in the context of shifting mottos of urban social movements. City 13(2–3):362–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane C (2011) Learning the city. Knowledge and translocal assemblage. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McGranahan G (2013) Community-driven sanitation improvement in deprived urban neighbourhoods: meeting the challenges of local collective action, co-production, affordability and a trans-sectoral approach. IIED, London

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan R, Spronk S, Caswell C (2014) Popular participation, equity, and co-production of water and sanitation services in Caracas, Venezuela. Water Int 39(2):201–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merrifield A (2011) The right to the city and beyond: notes on a Lefebvrian reconceptualization. City 15(3–4):473–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miraftab F (2009) Insurgent planning: situating radical planning in the global south. Plann Theor 8(1):32–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095208099297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitlin D, Satterthwaite D (2013) Urban poverty in the global south: scale and nature. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne P, Strokosh K (2013) It takes two to tango? Understanding the co-production of public services by integrating the services management and public administration perspectives. Br J Manag 24(1):31–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (1996) Crossing the great divide: co-production, synergy, and development. World Dev 24(6):1073–1087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parnell S (2010) The right to the city: institutional imperatives of a developmental state. Int J Urban Reg Res 34(1):146–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raco M (2005) Sustainable development, rolled-out neoliberalism and sustainable communities. Antipode 37(2):324–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raposo M (2004) Modernidad, Diseño Urbano y Utopía: Notas sobre el fundamento político de las acciones de Remodelación Urbana en Santiago. Revista de Urbanismo 9:116–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Renna H (2014) Sobre el ejercicio y construcción de autonomías. Poblar, Santiago

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez A, Sugranyes A (2006) El problema de vivienda de los “con techo”. In: Rodríguez A, Sugranyes A (eds) Los Con Techo: Un desafío para la política de vivienda social. Ediciones SUR, Santiago, pp 61–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez M, Di Virgilio M (2016) A city for all? Public policy and resistance to gentrification in the southern neighborhoods of Buenos Aires. Urban Geogr 37(8):1215–1234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rokem J, Boano C (eds) (2017) Urban geopolitics: rethinking planning in contested cities. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolnik R (2013) Late neoliberalism: the financialization of homeownership and housing rights. Int J Urban Reg Res 37(3):1468–2427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy A, AlSayyad N (2004) Urban informality: transnational perspectives from the Middle East, Latin America, and South Asia. Lexington Books, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Secchi B (2013) La città dei ricchi e la città dei poveri. Laterza, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Selle K (1994) Was ist bloss mit der Planung los? Erkundungen auf dem Weg zum kooperativen Handeln. Informationskreis fuer Raumplanung, Dortmund

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon A (2004) For the city yet to come: changing African life in four cities. Duke University Press, Durham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sinning H (1995) Verfahrensinnovationen kooperativer Stadt- und Regionalentwicklung. Raumforschung und Raumordnung 53:169–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinning H (2001) Verwaltungsmodernisierung und Planungskommunikation Qualitätsmanagement für bürgerorientierte Kommunen. RaumPlanung 97:181–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen A, Sagaris L (2010) From participation to the right to the city: democratic place management at the neighbourhood scale in comparative perspective. Plann Pract Res 25(3):297–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theodore N, Peck J, Brenner N (2011) Neoliberal urbanism: cities and the rule of markets. In: Bridge G, Watson S (eds) The new blackwell companion to the city. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 15–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Tironi M, Poduje I, Somma N, Yanez G (2010) Organizaciones emergentes, participación ciudadana y planificación urbana. Una propuesta de política pública. Publicaciones Políticas Públicas, UC Chile, Santiago

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivelli P (2011) La propuesta de modificación del Plan Regulador Metropolitano de Santiago PRMS 100 requiere una justificación más sólida. EURE (Santiago) 37(111):179–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner JFC (1976) Housing by people—towards autonomy in building environments. Marion Boyars, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Verschuere B, Brandsen T, Pestoff V (2012) Co-production: the state of the art in research and the future agenda. Voluntas 23(4):1083–1101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willinger S (2014) Informeller Urbanismus. In: Informationen zur Raumentwicklung. Bundesinstitut für Bau-, Stadt- und Raumforschung, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerah M-H, Dupont V, Lama-Rewal T (2011) Urban policies and the right to the city in India: rights, responsibilities and citizenship. UNESCO, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paola Alfaro d’Alençon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Alfaro d’Alençon, P., López Morales, E. (2018). The Urban as a Concrete Utopia? Co-production and Local Governance in Distinct Urban Geographies: Transnational Learning from Chile and Germany. In: Horn, P., Alfaro d'Alencon, P., Duarte Cardoso, A. (eds) Emerging Urban Spaces. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57816-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics