Abstract
Reflecting on empirical material from Chile and Germany, this chapter combines practical insights for an analysis of co-productive urban projects with the aim to generate insights for the ‘right to the city’, a concept that has travelled from Europe to North and later Latin America . We argue not only for different avenues to understand the right to the city, but also emphasise that there is a need to reflect on how the concept has been reformulated by different local interactions. Emphasis is placed on how civil society actors are locally connected to their cities—in our case mainly Berlin and Santiago , while at the same time engaged in networks of collaboration and knowledge exchange via ‘encounters’. In this chapter, reflections on encounters allow shedding light on emerging struggles but also negotiation practices between different actors in the co-production processes. Co-productive practices might certainly entail a risk of underestimating broader structural changes in urban development —which, at times, resonate with neoliberal individualism. Yet, our findings also reveal that such practices bring to light important elements of the right to the city, especially claims for being within the urban core and democratic engagement in city-building. Drawing on Henri Lefebvre’s terminology we, hence, argue that these practices reflect the right to centrality and the right to participation; they represent encounters that emerge in constant struggle, contestation and negotiation processes. Understood like this, the urban becomes a concrete utopia—a possibility, a promise to be constantly produced and reproduced.
This chapter is based on the authors’ research projects: ‘Ansätze von koproduzierter Stadtentwicklung und ihr Einfluss auf die Entwicklung von sozial-inklusiven Stadträumen—ein internationaler Vergleich von Theorie und Praxis’, preperation studies for the DFG Reseach Project, 2018–2021, TU-Berlin; ‘Spatial capital, social complexity of the rent gap formation, and social stratification: a comparative analysis of gentrification in Santiago, Buenos Aires, Rio de Janeiro and Mexico City, 2005–2017’ (Fondecyt Chile, Project #1151287); and the Centre of Conflict and Social Cohesion Studies (Conicyt Fondap #15130009). It also draws on findings from consultancies by uLab for several urban projects in Berlin (Initiative RAW. Kulturensemble; Ostkreuz Initiativen Netzwerk). Data was obtained through discourse analysis and comparative case studies in different German cities (e.g. Berlin, Leipzig and Hamburg) and Santiago de Chile (Estación Central comuna), involving municipalities, planners, various actors in civil society related to local urban development, and through consultation and monitoring of collaborative projects within local communities and the private sector. In both cases, the work concentrated on the processes of adaptation and transformation, which is accompanied by in-depth research on development approaches that initiate new forms of collaboration, local economies and local learning processes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Not In My Back Yard (NIMBY).
- 2.
References
Alfaro d’Alençon P, Bauerfeind B, Konrad D (2017) Ephemere Stadtentwicklung. Handbuch und Planungshilfe. DOM Publishers, Berlin
Aravena A, Iacobelli A (2013) Elemental: incremental housing and participatory design manual (Bilingual edition). Hatje Cantz, Ostfildern
Bishop P, Williams L (2012) The temporary city. Routledge, London
Bovaird T, Loeffler E (2012) From engagement to co-production: the contribution of users and communities to outcomes and public value. VOLUNTAS: J Voluntary Nonprofit Organ 23(4):1119–1138
Brenner N (2016) Critique of urbanization: selected essays. Birkhaeuser, Basel
Buttenberg L, Overmeyer K, Spars G (2014) Raumunternehmen: Wie Nutzer selbst Räume entwickeln. Jovis Verlag, Berlin
Castillo Couve M (2011) Producción y gestión habitacional de los pobladores. La autogestión de vivienda en Peñalolén y La Pintana, Santiago de Chile. Boletín CF + S, 54, 133–145
Cociña C, López-Morales E (2017) Unpacking narratives of social conflict and inclusion: anti-gentrification neighbourhood organisation in Santiago, Chile. In: Rokem J, Boano C (eds) Urban geopolitics: rethinking planning in contested cities. Routledge, London
de Souza M (2010) Which right to which city? in defence of political-strategic clarity. Interface J Soc Mov 2(1):315–333
Dellenbaugh M, Kip M, Bienoik M, Müller A, Schwegmann M (2015) Urban commons: moving beyond state and market. Birkhaeuser, Basel
Díaz-Parra I, Rabasco-Pozuelo P (2013) Revitalización sin gentrificación? Cooperativas de vivienda por ayuda mutua en los centros de Buenos Aires y Montevideo. Cuadernos Geográficos 52(2):99–118
Dohnke J (2013) Spree Riverbanks for everyone! What remains of “Sink Mediaspree”?. In: Bernt M, Grell B and Holm A (eds) The Berlin reader. A compendium on urban change and activism. Transcript Verlag, Berlin, pp 261–275
Fernández V (2012) Participación Ciudadana en Diseño Urbano: promoviendo una ciudad más inclusiva. Revista de Urbanismo 27:92–113
Ffrench-Davis R (2004) Entre el neoliberalismo y el crecimiento con equidad: tres décadas de política económica en Chile. Siglo XXI, Buenos Aires
Frank AG (1976) Economic genocide in Chile: monetary theory versus humanity: two open letters to Arnold Harberger and Milton Friedman. Spokesman Books, Nottingham
Fuchs O, Fürst D, Rohr-Zänker R (2002) Neue Kooperationsformen in der Stadtentwicklung. Auftakt zum neuen Forschungsfeld im Experimentellen Wohnungs- und Städtebau. Bundesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung, Bonn
Galetovic A, Poduje I, Sanhueza R (2009) Malles en Santiago de centros comerciales a centros urbanos. Estudios Públicos 114:219–252
Garretón M (2014) Derecho a la ciudad y partici- pación frente al centralismo en Chile. Revista 180(34):4–9
Gerkens K (2013) Stadtumbaukultur – Was können wir vom Osten lernen. Amt für Stadterneuerung und Wohnungsbauförderung, Leipzig
Griffith R (1998) Making sameness: place marketing and the new urban entrepreneurialism. In: Oatley N (ed) Cities, economic competition and urban policy. Sage, London
Harpham T, Boateng K (1997) Urban governance in relation to the operation of urban services in developing countries. Habitat Int 21(1):65–77
Harvey D (2003) The right to the city. Int J Urban Reg Res 27(4):939–941
Haydn F, Temel R (eds) (2006) Temporary urban spaces: concepts for the use of city spaces. Birkhauser, Basel
Heeg S, Rosol M (2007) Neoliberale Stadtpolitik im globalen Kontext. Prokla, Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialwissenschaft 37(4):491–509
Helfrich S (2012) Commons. Für eine neue Politik jenseits von Markt und Staat. Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung, Berlin
Jakobsen M (2012) Can government initiatives increase citizen coproduction? results of a randomized field experiment. J Public Adm Res Theor 23(1):27–54
Joshi A, Moore M (2004) Institutionalised co-production: unorthodox public service delivery in challenging environments. J Dev Stud 40(4):31–49
Langhagen-Rohrbach C (2010) Raumordnung und Landesplanung. Wiss. Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt
Lees L, Shin HB, Lopez-Morales E (2016) Planetary gentrification. Wiley, London
Lefebvre H (2003[1970]) The urban revolution, 1st edn. Univ of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis
López-Morales E (2016) A multidimensional approach to urban entrepreneurialism, financialization, and gentrification in the high-rise residential market of inner Santiago, Chile. In: Soederberg S (ed) Risking capitalism (Research in political economy, Vol 31, 79–105). Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley
López Morales E, Ruiz-Tagle J, Marín H, Orozco H, Meza D (2017) ¿”Guetos verticales” o gentrificación? Resultados de encuesta panel de re-estratificación social de los barrios centrales de Santiago. Seminario en Facultad de Arquitectura y Urbanismo, Universidad de Chile, Santiago
Marcuse P (2014) Reading the right to the city. City 18(1):4–9
Mayer M (2009) The “Right to the City” in the context of shifting mottos of urban social movements. City 13(2–3):362–374
McFarlane C (2011) Learning the city. Knowledge and translocal assemblage. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester
McGranahan G (2013) Community-driven sanitation improvement in deprived urban neighbourhoods: meeting the challenges of local collective action, co-production, affordability and a trans-sectoral approach. IIED, London
McMillan R, Spronk S, Caswell C (2014) Popular participation, equity, and co-production of water and sanitation services in Caracas, Venezuela. Water Int 39(2):201–215
Merrifield A (2011) The right to the city and beyond: notes on a Lefebvrian reconceptualization. City 15(3–4):473–481
Miraftab F (2009) Insurgent planning: situating radical planning in the global south. Plann Theor 8(1):32–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095208099297
Mitlin D, Satterthwaite D (2013) Urban poverty in the global south: scale and nature. Routledge, London
Osborne P, Strokosh K (2013) It takes two to tango? Understanding the co-production of public services by integrating the services management and public administration perspectives. Br J Manag 24(1):31–47
Ostrom E (1996) Crossing the great divide: co-production, synergy, and development. World Dev 24(6):1073–1087
Parnell S (2010) The right to the city: institutional imperatives of a developmental state. Int J Urban Reg Res 34(1):146–162
Raco M (2005) Sustainable development, rolled-out neoliberalism and sustainable communities. Antipode 37(2):324–347
Raposo M (2004) Modernidad, Diseño Urbano y Utopía: Notas sobre el fundamento político de las acciones de Remodelación Urbana en Santiago. Revista de Urbanismo 9:116–140
Renna H (2014) Sobre el ejercicio y construcción de autonomías. Poblar, Santiago
Rodríguez A, Sugranyes A (2006) El problema de vivienda de los “con techo”. In: Rodríguez A, Sugranyes A (eds) Los Con Techo: Un desafío para la política de vivienda social. Ediciones SUR, Santiago, pp 61–80
Rodríguez M, Di Virgilio M (2016) A city for all? Public policy and resistance to gentrification in the southern neighborhoods of Buenos Aires. Urban Geogr 37(8):1215–1234
Rokem J, Boano C (eds) (2017) Urban geopolitics: rethinking planning in contested cities. Routledge, London
Rolnik R (2013) Late neoliberalism: the financialization of homeownership and housing rights. Int J Urban Reg Res 37(3):1468–2427
Roy A, AlSayyad N (2004) Urban informality: transnational perspectives from the Middle East, Latin America, and South Asia. Lexington Books, Oxford
Secchi B (2013) La città dei ricchi e la città dei poveri. Laterza, Rome
Selle K (1994) Was ist bloss mit der Planung los? Erkundungen auf dem Weg zum kooperativen Handeln. Informationskreis fuer Raumplanung, Dortmund
Simon A (2004) For the city yet to come: changing African life in four cities. Duke University Press, Durham
Sinning H (1995) Verfahrensinnovationen kooperativer Stadt- und Regionalentwicklung. Raumforschung und Raumordnung 53:169–176
Sinning H (2001) Verwaltungsmodernisierung und Planungskommunikation Qualitätsmanagement für bürgerorientierte Kommunen. RaumPlanung 97:181–186
Sorensen A, Sagaris L (2010) From participation to the right to the city: democratic place management at the neighbourhood scale in comparative perspective. Plann Pract Res 25(3):297–316
Theodore N, Peck J, Brenner N (2011) Neoliberal urbanism: cities and the rule of markets. In: Bridge G, Watson S (eds) The new blackwell companion to the city. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 15–25
Tironi M, Poduje I, Somma N, Yanez G (2010) Organizaciones emergentes, participación ciudadana y planificación urbana. Una propuesta de política pública. Publicaciones Políticas Públicas, UC Chile, Santiago
Trivelli P (2011) La propuesta de modificación del Plan Regulador Metropolitano de Santiago PRMS 100 requiere una justificación más sólida. EURE (Santiago) 37(111):179–184
Turner JFC (1976) Housing by people—towards autonomy in building environments. Marion Boyars, London
Verschuere B, Brandsen T, Pestoff V (2012) Co-production: the state of the art in research and the future agenda. Voluntas 23(4):1083–1101
Willinger S (2014) Informeller Urbanismus. In: Informationen zur Raumentwicklung. Bundesinstitut für Bau-, Stadt- und Raumforschung, Bonn
Zerah M-H, Dupont V, Lama-Rewal T (2011) Urban policies and the right to the city in India: rights, responsibilities and citizenship. UNESCO, New Delhi
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Alfaro d’Alençon, P., López Morales, E. (2018). The Urban as a Concrete Utopia? Co-production and Local Governance in Distinct Urban Geographies: Transnational Learning from Chile and Germany. In: Horn, P., Alfaro d'Alencon, P., Duarte Cardoso, A. (eds) Emerging Urban Spaces. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57816-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57816-3_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57815-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57816-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)