Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Bringing Robotics in Classrooms

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Robotics in STEM Education

Abstract

Learning with educational robotics provides students, who usually are the consumers of technology, with opportunities to stop, question, and think deeply about technology. When designing, constructing, programming, and documenting the development of autonomous robots or robotics projects, students not only learn how technology works, but they also apply the skills and content knowledge learned in school in a meaningful and exciting way. Educational robotics is rich with opportunities to integrate not only STEM but also many other disciplines, including literacy, social studies, dance, music, and art, while giving students the opportunity to find ways to work together to foster collaboration skills, express themselves using the technological tool, problem-solve, and think critically and innovatively. Educational robotics is a learning tool that enhances students’ learning experience through hands-on mind-on learning. Most importantly, educational robotics provides a fun and exciting learning environment because of its hands-on nature and the integration of technology. The engaging learning environment motivates students to learn whatever skills and knowledge needed for them to accomplish their goals in order to complete the projects of their interest. For school-age children, most robotics activities have mainly been part of informal education, such as after school programs and summer camps (Benitti in Computers & Education, 58:978–988, 2012; Eguchi 2007b; Sklar and Eguchi in Proceedings of RoboCup-2004: Robot Soccer World Cup VIII, 2004), even though it has the potential to make learning more effective in formal education. It is very difficult for teachers to include robotics in regular curriculum because of the heavy focus on standardized testing and pressure to cover academic standards set by the government and/or their States. This chapter aims to promote robotics in classroom by connecting robotics learning with various STEM curriculum standards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ackermann, E. K. (1996). Perspective-taking and object construction: Two keys to learning. In Y. Kafai & M. Resnick (Eds.), Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world (pp. 25–37). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackermann, E. K. (2001). Piaget’s constructivism, paper’s constructionism: What’s the difference? pp. 1–11. Retrieved from http://learning.media.mit.edu/content/publications/EA.Piaget_Papert.pdf

  • Ackermann, E. K. (2004). Constructing knowledge and transforming the world. In M. Tokoro & L. Steels (Eds.), A learning zone of one’s own: Sharing representations and flow in collaborative learning environments (pp. 15–37). Washington, DC: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alimisis, D. (2013). Educational robotics: Open questions and new challenges. Themes in Science & Teaching Education, 6(1), 63–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alimisis, D., & Kynigos, C. (2009). Constructionism and robotics in education. In D. Alimisis (Ed.), Teacher education on robotics-enhanced constructivist pedagogical methods. Athens, Greece: School of Pedagogical and Technological Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atmatzidou, S., & Demetriadis, S. (2012). Evaluating the role of collaboration scripts as group guiding tools in activities of educational robotics. Paper presented at the 2012 12th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, Rome, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benitti, F. B. V. (2012). Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 58, 978–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bers, M. U. (2008). Blocks to robots: Learning with technology in the early childhood classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blikstien, P. (2013). Digital fabrication and ‘making in education”: The democratization of invention. In J. W. H. C. Buching (Ed.), FabLabs: Of makers and inventors. Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratzel, B. (2007). Physics by design: RoboLab activities for the NXT and RCX. Knoxville, TN: College House Enterprises LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratzel, B. (2009). Physics by design with NXT Mindstorms. Knoxville, TN: College House Enterprises LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratzel, B. (2014). STEM by design: Teaching with LEGO Mindstorms EV3. Knoxville, TN: College House Enterprises LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbonaro, M., Rex, M., & Chambers, J. (2004). Using LEGO robotics in a project-based learning environment. Interactive Multimedia Electronic Journal of Computer Enhanced Learning, 6(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavicchi, E., Chiu, S.-M., & McDonnell, F. (2009). Introductory paper on critical explorations in teaching art, science, and teacher education. The New Educator, 5, 189–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Highly Successful Schools for Programs for K-12 STEM Education Board on Science, E. a. B. o. T. a. A., & Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. (2011). Successful K-12 STEM education—Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington D.C.: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Standard for mathematical practice. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/Math/Practice/

  • Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, & The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. (2011). Europe 2020 flagship initiative innovation union SEC (2010) 1161. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Computer Science Teachers Association, & International Society for Technology in Education. (2011). Computational thinking leadership toolkit. Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/docs/ct-documents/ct-leadershipt-toolkit.pdf?sfvrsn=4

  • Cruz-Martin, A., Fernandez-Madrigal, J. A., Galindo, C., Gonzalez-Jimenez, J., & Stockmans-Daou, C. (2012). A LEGO Mindstorms NXT approach for teaching at data acquisition, control systems engineering and real-time systems undergraduate courses. Computers & Education, 59, 974–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DARPA. (n.a.). DARPA robotics challenge finals 2015: Overview—What is the DARPA robotics challenge (DRC)? Retrieved from http://www.theroboticschallenge.org/overview

  • Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. (2015). State of the Innovation Union 2015. Luxemburg: Publication Office of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duckworth, E. (2005). Critical exploration in the classroom. The New Educator, 1(4), 257–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duckworth, E. (2006). The having of wonderful ideas: and other essays on teaching and learning (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edutopia. (n.a., 2008, February 28). Project-based learning. Retrieved from http://www.edutopia.org/project-based-learning

  • Eguchi, A. (2007a, March). Educational robotics for elementary school classroom. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology and Education (SITE), San Antonio, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eguchi, A. (2007b). Educational robotics for elementary school classroom. In Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology and Education (SITE), pp. 2542–2549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eguchi, A. (2007c). Educational robotics for undergraduate freshmen. In Proceedings of the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, pp. 1792–1797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eguchi, A. (2012). Student learning experience through CoSpace educational robotics. In Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eguchi, A. (2014). Why robotics in education? Robotics as a learning tool for educational revolution. In Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eguchi, A. (2015). Educational robotics as a learning tool for promoting rich environments for active learning (REALs). In J. Keengwe (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational technology integration and active learning (pp. 19–47). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference (IGI Global).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eguchi, A. (2016). Computational thinking with educational robotics. In Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eguchi, A., & Almeida, L. (2013). RoboCupJunior: Promoting STEM education with robotics competition. In Proceedings of the Robotics in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eguchi, A., & Uribe, L. (2012). Educational robotics meets inquiry-based learning. In L. Lennex & K. F. Nettleton (Eds.), Cases on inquiry through technology in math and science: Systemic approaches. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference (IGI Global).

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkind, D. (2008). Forward. In M. U. Bers (Ed.), Block to robots (pp. xi–xiv). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdogan, N., Corlu, M. S., & Capraro, R. (2013). Defining innovation literacy: Do robotics programs help students develop innovation literacy skills? International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(1), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • FIRST Robotics Competition. (2016). Standard alignment map. Retrieved from http://www.firstinspires.org/resource-library/frc/standard-alignment-map

  • Freire, P. (1994). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th ed.). New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelb, M., & Caldicott, S. M. (2007). Innovate like Edison: The success system of America’s greatest inventor. New York, NY: Penguin Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabinger, S., & Dunlap, J. C. (1995). Rich environments for active learning: A definition. Research in Learning Technology, 3(2), 5–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabinger, S., Dunlap, J. C., & Duffield, J. A. (1997). Rich environment for active learning, in action: Problem-based learning. Research in Learning Technology, 5(2), 5–17. doi:10.1080/0968776970050202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halverson, E. R., & Sheridan, K. M. (2014). The maker movement in education. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 495–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, S., & Bhattacharya, K. (2001). Constructionism, learning by design, and project based learning. In M. Orey (Ed.), Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching and technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, M. (2014). The maker movement manifesto—Rules for innovation in the new world of crafters, hackers, and tinkerers. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Innovation Union. (2015). Promoting excellence in education and skills development. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/research/innovation-union/index_en.cfm?pg=action-points

  • Kalil, T., & Miller, J. (2014, February 3). Announcing the first white house maker faire. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2014/02/03/announcing-first-white-house-maker-faire

  • Kee, D. (2011). Classroom activities for the busy teacher: NXT (2nd ed.). CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kee, D. (2013). Classroom activities for the busy teacher: EV3. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kee, D. (2015). Classroom activities for the busy teacher: VEX IQ with Modkit for VEX. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kee, D. (2016). Classroom activities for the busy teacher: VEX IQ with ROBOTC Graphical. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolberg, E., & Orlev, N. (2001). Robotics learning as a tool for integrating science-technology curriculum in K-12 schools. Paper presented at the 31st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Reno, NV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maker Faire. (n.a.). The maker movement. Retrieved from http://makerfaire.com/maker-movement/

  • Martin, F., Mikhak, B., Resnick, M., Silverman, B., & Berg, R. (2000). To Mindstorms and beyond: Evolution of a construction kit for magical machines. In A. Druin & J. Hendler (Eds.), Robots for kids: Exploring new technologies for learning (pp. 9–33). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, S. L., & Stager, G. (2013). Invent to learn: Making, tinkering, and engineering in the classroom. Torrance, CA: Constructing Modern Knowledge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mataric, M. J. (2004). Robotics education for all ages. Paper presented at the American Association for Artificial Intelligence Spring Symposium on Accessible, Hands-on AI and Robotics Education. http://robotics.usc.edu/~maja/publications/aaaissymp04-edu.pdf

  • Middlehurst, C. (2015, November 2). ‘Human’ robot Pepper proves popular again and sells out in less than a minute in Japan. The Telegraph. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/japan/11969300/Human-robot-Pepper-proves-popular-again-and-sells-out-in-less-than-a-minute-in-Japan.html

  • Miller, D. P., Nourbakhsh, I. R., & Sigwart, R. (2008). Robots for education. In B. Siciliano & O. Khatib (Eds.), Springer handbook of robotics (pp. 1283–1301). New York, NY: Springer New York, LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Economy Trade and Industry. (n.a.). The executive committee and the advisory board for the international robot competition meeting (1st) related documents. Retrieved from http://www.meti.go.jp/committee/kenkyukai/seizou/robot_competition/001_haifu.html

  • Moreton, B., Elias, G., Bowler, S., Tardiani, G., & Kee, D. (2014). ACARA Link. Retrieved from http://www.robocupjunior.org.au/acara

  • National Economic Council, Council of Economic Advisers, & Office of Science and Technology Policy. (2011). Strategy for American innovation—Securing our economic growth and prosperity. Retrieved from https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/uploads/InnovationStrategy.pdf

  • Next Generation Science Standard. (2013). Appendix I—Engineering design in the NGSS. Retrieved from http://www.nextgenscience.org/sites/ngss/files/AppendixI-Engineering.Design.in.NGSS-FINAL_V2.pdf

  • Nourbakhsh, I. R., Hamner, E., Crowley, K., & Wilkinson, K. (2004). Formal measures of learning in a secondary school mobile robotics course. Paper presented at the 2004 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, New Orleans, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2015). OECD innovation strategy 2015—An agenda for policy action. Retrieved from Paris, France: http://www.oecd.org/sti/OECD-Innovation-Strategy-2015-CMIN2015-7.pdf

  • Oppliger, D. (2002, November). Using FIRST LEGO league to enhance engineering education and to increase the pool of future engineering students (work in progress). Paper presented at the 32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • OUTREACH@DARPA.MIL. (2014, March 13). The DARPA grand challenge: Ten years later—Autonomous vehicle challenge led to new technologies and invigorated the prize challenge model of promoting innovation. Retrieved from http://www.darpa.mil/news-events/2014-03-13

  • Papert, S. (1993). Mindstorms—Children, computers, and powerful ideas (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Constructionism. New York, NY: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2008). 21st Century skills, education & competitiveness guide—A resource and policy guide. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/21st_century_skills_education_and_competitiveness_guide.pdf

  • Piaget, J. (1929). The child’s conception of the world. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. New York: Basic Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, K. (2010). Changing education paradigms. Retrieved from http://www.ted.com/talks/ken_robinson_changing_education_paradigms.html

  • Rogers, C., & Portsmore, M. (2004). Bringing engineering to elementary school. Journal of STEM Education, 5(3&4), 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusk, N., Resnick, M., Berg, R., & Pezalla-Granlund, M. (2008). New pathways into robotics: Strategies for broadening participation. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(1), 59–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sklar, E., & Eguchi, A. (2004). RoboCupJunior—Four years later. In Proceedings of RoboCup-2004: Robot Soccer World Cup VIII.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sklar, E., Eguchi, A., & Johnson, J. (2002). Examining the team robotics through RoboCupJunior. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of Japan Society for Educational Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sklar, E., Eguchi, A., & Johnson, J. (2003). Scientific challenge award: RoboCupJunior—Learning with educational robotics. AI Magazine, 24(2), 43–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • SoftBank Mobile Corp., & Aldebaran Robotics SAS. (2014). SoftBank mobile and Aldebaran Unveil “Pepper”—the world’s first personal robot that reads emotions. Retrieved from http://www.softbank.jp/en/corp/group/sbm/news/press/2014/20140605_01/

  • Tanabe, K. (2015, June 23). Second generation Pepper for household use came out with a totally different “character” (Japanese). Toyo Keizai. Retrieved from http://toyokeizai.net/articles/-/74275

  • Tanenbaum, C. (2016). STEM 2026: A vision for innovation in STEM education. Retrieved from http://www.air.org/resource/stem-2026

  • The Conference Board of Canada. (n.a.). Innovation skills profile 2.0.

    Google Scholar 

  • The White House. (2011). Innovation. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/issues/economy/innovation

  • U.S. Department of Education. (2015). Science, technology, engineering and math: Education for global leadership. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/stem

  • U.S. Department of Education, & Office of Innovation and Improvement. (2016). STEM 2026: A vision for innovation in STEM education. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Innovation and Improvement.

    Google Scholar 

  • VEX EDR. (n.a.). Standards matching & accreditation. Retrieved from http://curriculum.vexrobotics.com/teacher-materials/standards-matching-and-accreditation

  • Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wing, J. M. (2010). Computational thinking: What and why? Retrieved from http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~CompThink/resources/TheLinkWing.pdf

  • Yamakami, T. (2012). Innovation literacy: Implications from a shift toward dynamic multidisciplinary engineering. Paper presented at the 8th International Conference on Information Science and Digital Content Technology (ICIDT), Jeju Island, Korea.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bloomfield College, Bloomfield, NJ, USA

    Amy Eguchi

Authors
  1. Amy Eguchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amy Eguchi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Emirates College for Advanced Education, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

    Myint Swe Khine

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Eguchi, A. (2017). Bringing Robotics in Classrooms. In: Khine, M. (eds) Robotics in STEM Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57786-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57786-9_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57785-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57786-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation