Advertisement

The Fractal Nature of Lifestyles

Chapter
Part of the Palgrave's Frontiers in Criminology Theory book series (FCRT)

Abstract

This chapter describes the fractal (chaotic principle) structure of a criminal lifestyle and reminds the reader that a criminal lifestyle is only one out of an infinite number of possible lifestyles into which behavior can be organized. A good portion of this chapter is devoted to discussions on how different families of lifestyle have evolved over time and how lifestyles continue to evolve. Different families of lifestyle are first identified, followed by an in-depth analysis of a lifestyle from the same family of lifestyles as the criminal lifestyle (i.e., the drug lifestyle) that is relevant to the study and treatment of criminal behavior.

Keywords

Fractals Families of lifestyle Drug lifestyle 

References

  1. Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). New Providence, NJ: Matthew Bender.Google Scholar
  2. Anglin, M. G., Brecht, M.-L., Woodward, J. A., & Bonett, D. G. (1986). An empirical study of maturing out: Conditional factors. International Journal of the Addictions, 21, 233–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Best, D., Day, E., Homayoun, S., Lenton, H., Moverley, R., & Openshaw, M. (2008). Treatment retention in the Drug Intervention Programme: Do primary drug users fare better than primary offenders? Drugs: Education Prevention and Policy, 15, 201–209.Google Scholar
  4. Bucholz, K. K., Heath, A. C., Reich, T., Hesselbrock, V. M., Kramer, J. R., & Schuckit, M. A. (1996). Can we subtype alcoholism? A latent class analysis of data from relatives of alcoholics in a multicenter family study of alcoholism. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 20(1462–1471), 9.Google Scholar
  5. Clark, D. B., & Bukstein, O. G. (1998). Psychopathology in adolescent alcohol abuse and dependence. Alcohol Health and Research World, 22, 117–121.Google Scholar
  6. Cloninger, C. R. (1987). Neurogenetic adaptive mechanisms in alcoholism. Science, 236, 410–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Green, B. A., Ahmed, A. O., Marcus, D. K., & Walters, G. D. (2011). The latent structure of alcohol use pathology in an epidemiological sample. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 45, 225–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Haslam, N., Holland, E., & Kuppens, P. (2012). Categories versus dimensions in personality and psychopathology: A quantitative review of taxometric research. Psychological Medicine, 42, 903–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Helzer, J. E., Bucholz, K. K., & Gossop, M. (2007). A dimensional option for the diagnosis of substance dependence in DSM-V. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 16, S24–S33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Henggeler, S. W., Clingempeel, W. G., Brondino, M. J., & Pickrel, S. G. (2002). Four year follow-up of multisystemic therapy with substance-abusing and substance dependent juvenile offenders. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 41, 868–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hudziak, J. J., Copeland, W., Stanger, C., & Wadsworth, M. (2004). Screening for DSM-IV externalizing disorders with the Child Behavior Checklist: A receiver-operating characteristic analysis. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 1299–1307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Karberg, J. C., & James, D. J. (2005). Substance dependence, abuse, and treatment of jail inmates, 2002, Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report (NCJ 209588). U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  13. Loeber, R., White, H. R., & Burke, J. D. (2012). Developmental sequences and pathways towards serious delinquency and substance use. In T. Bliesener, A. Beelmann, & M. Stemmler (Eds.), Antisocial behaviour and crime: Contributions of developmental and evaluation research to prevention and intervention (pp. 39–52). Cambridge, UK: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  14. Lynskey, M. T., Agrawal, A., & Heath, A. C. (2010). Genetically informative research on adolescent substance use: Methods, findings, and challenges. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 49, 1202–1214.Google Scholar
  15. McGrath, R. E., & Walters, G. D. (2012). Taxometric analysis as a general strategy for distinguishing categorical from dimensional latent structure. Psychological Methods, 17, 284–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McLellan, A. T., Kushner, H., Metzger, D., Peters, R., Smith, I., & Grissom, G. (1992). The fifth edition of the Addiction Severity Index. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 9, 199–213.Google Scholar
  17. Mitchell, O., Wilson, D. B., & MacKenzie, D. L. (2007). Does incarceration-based drug treatment reduce recidivism? A meta-analytic synthesis of the research. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 3, 353–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Morey, L. C. (2007). The Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI): Professional manual (2nd ed.). Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  19. Mumola, C. J., & Karberg, J. C. (2006). Drug use and dependence, state and federal prisoners, 2004. Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report (NCJ 213530). U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  20. Ruiz, M. A., Pincus, A. L., & Schinka, J. A. (2008). Externalizing pathology and the five-factor model: A meta-analysis of personality traits associated with antisocial personality disorder, substance use disorder, and their co-occurrence. Journal of Personality Disorders, 22, 365–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sheidow, A. J., Jayawardhana, J., Bradford, W. D., Henggeler, S. W., & Shapiro, S. B. (2012). Money matters: Cost-effectiveness of juvenile drug court with and without evidence-based treatment. Journal of Child and Adolescent Substance Abuse, 21, 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Slade, T., Grove, R., & Teesson, M. (2009). A taxometric analysis of alcohol abuse and dependence in a general population sample: Evidence of dimensional latent structure and implications for DSM-V. Addiction, 104, 742–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Walters, G. D. (1994). Discriminating between high and low volume substance abusers by means of the Drug Lifestyle Screening Interview. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 20, 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Walters, G. D. (1995). Predictive validity of the Drug Lifestyle Screening Form: A two-year follow-up. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 21, 187–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Walters, G. D. (1998). Changing lives of crime and drugs: Intervening with the substance abusing criminal offender. Chichester, England: Wiley.Google Scholar
  26. Walters, G. D. (2000). Beyond behavior: Construction of an overarching psychological theory of lifestyles. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  27. Walters, G. D. (2008). The latent structure of alcohol use disorders: A taxometric analysis of structured interview data obtained from male federal prison inmates. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 43, 326–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Walters, G. D. (2009). Taxometric analysis of alcohol dependence in male prisoners: Measuring latent structures with indicators from DSM-IV. Addiction Research & Theory, 17, 372–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Walters, G. D. (2012). Crime in a psychological context: From career criminals to criminal careers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Walters, G. D. (2014a). Does substance abuse fall exclusively along the externalizing spectrum? Substance Use and Misuse, 49, 724–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Walters, G. D. (2014b). Crime and substance misuse in adjudicated delinquent youth: The worst of both worlds. Law and Human Behavior, 38, 139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Walters, G. D. (2015a). The latent structure of alcohol misuse in young adults: Do taxometric results differ as a function of prior criminal history? Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 157, 90–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Walters, G. D. (2015b). Recidivism and the “worst of both worlds” hypothesis: Do substance misuse and crime interact or accumulate? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42, 435–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Walters, G. D. (2016a). Mediating the distal crime-drug relationship with proximal reactive criminal thinking. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 30, 128–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Walters, G. D. (2016b). Breaking the Cycle Demonstration Project: Using a quasi-experimental analysis to test the “worst of both worlds” hypothesis and risk principle. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 12, 127–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Walters, G. D., & Magaletta, P. R. (2015). Comorbid antisocial and substance misuse proclivity and mental health service utilization by female inmates: Testing the worst of both worlds hypothesis with the PAI. Psychological Services, 12, 28–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Walters, G. D., Hennig, C. L., Negola, T. D., & Fricke, L. A. (2009). The latent structure of alcohol dependence in female federal prisoners. Addiction Research & Theory, 17, 525–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Welte, J. W., Barnes, G. M., Hoffman, J. H., Wieczorek, W. F., & Zhang, L. (2005). Substance involvement and the trajectory of criminal offending in young males. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 31, 267–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zagar, R. J., Grove, W. M., & Busch, K. G. (2013). Delinquency best treatments: How to divert youths from violence while saving lives and detention costs. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 31, 381–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kutztown UniversityKutztownUSA

Personalised recommendations