Future Issues, Questions, and Concerns

  • Glenn D. Walters
Part of the Palgrave's Frontiers in Criminology Theory book series (FCRT)


In Chap.  10 of this book future directions for criminal lifestyle theory and research are discussed. Some of the future directions for research include the need for statistical models to complement the largely conceptual approach lifestyle theory takes with nonlinear dynamical systems theory, the need for continued integration and cross-fostering of theory and research methods, and the need for research from investigators outside the original author of lifestyle theory.


Future directions Statistical models Integration 


  1. Agnew, R. (2011). Toward a unified criminology: Integrating assumptions about crime, people, and society. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Beaver, K. M., Nedelec, J., Costa, C. S., & Vidal, M. M. (2015). The future of biosocial criminology. Criminal Justice Studies, 28, 6–17.Google Scholar
  3. Bernard, T. J., & Snipes, J. B. (1996). Theoretical integration in criminology. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (pp. 301–348). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Besemer, S. (2014). The impact of timing and frequency of parental criminal behaviour and risk factors on offspring offending. Psychology, Crime & Law, 20, 78–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blair, P. R., Marcus, D. K., & Boccaccini, M. T. (2008). Is there an allegiance effect for assessment instruments? Actuarial risk assessment as an exemplar. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 15, 346–360.Google Scholar
  6. Bush, J., Glick, B., & Taymans, J. (1997). Thinking for a change: Integrated cognitive behavior change program. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections.Google Scholar
  7. Carroll, J., & Weaver, F. (1986). Shoplifters’ perceptions of crime opportunities: A process-tracing study. In D. B. Cornish & R. V. Clarke (Eds.), The reasoning criminal: Rational choice perspectives on offending (pp. 19–31). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chan, M. E., & Arvey, R. D. (2012). Meta-analysis and the development of knowledge. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 79–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Day, A., Casey, S., & Gerace, A. (2010). Interventions to improve empathy awareness in sexual and violent offenders: Conceptual, empirical, and clinical issues. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15, 201–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ericson, R., & Carriere, K. (1994). The fragmentation of criminology. In D. Nelken (Ed.), The futures of criminology (pp. 89–109). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Farrington, D. P. (2005). The integrated cognitive antisocial potential (ICAP) theory. In D. P. Farrington (Ed.), Integrated developmental and life-course theories of offending (pp. 73–91). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
  12. Frick, P. J., Ray, J. V., Thornton, L. C., & Kahn, R. E. (2014). Can callous-unemotional traits enhance the understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of serious conduct problems in children and adolescents? A comprehensive review. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goldstein, A. P., Glick, B., & Reiner, S. (1987). Aggression Replacement Training. Champaign, IL: Research Press.Google Scholar
  14. Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hare, R. D., & Neumann, C. S. (2008). Psychopath as a clinical and empirical construct. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4, 217–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hirsch, M. W., Smale, S., & Devaney, R. L. (2004). Differential equations, dynamical systems, and an introduction to chaos. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  17. Jacobs, B. A., Topalli, V., & Wright, R. (2000). Managing retaliation: Drug robbery and informal sanction threats. Criminology, 38, 171–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2004). Empathy and offending: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9(5), 441–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lewin, K. (1952). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers by Kurt Lewin. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  20. Lin, W., Mack, D., Enright, R. D., Krahn, D., & Baskin, T. W. (2004). Effects of forgiveness therapy on anger, mood, and vulnerability to substance use among impatient substance dependent clients. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 114–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Little, G. L., & Robinson, K. D. (1986). How to escape your prison. Memphis, TN: Eagle Wing Books.Google Scholar
  22. Luborsky, L., Diguer, L., Seligman, D. A., Rosenthal, R., Krause, E. D., … Scheizer, E. (1999). The researcher’s own therapy allegiances: A “wild card” in comparisons of treatment efficacy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 6, 95–106.Google Scholar
  23. Mann, R. E., & Barnett, G. D. (2012). Victim empathy intervention with sexual offenders: Rehabilitation, punishment, or correctional quackery? Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 25, 282–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Monahan, K. C., Steinberg, L., & Cauffman, E. (2009). Affiliation with antisocial peers, susceptibility to peer influence, and antisocial behavior during the transition to adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 45, 1520–1530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Munder, T., Brütsch, O., Leonhart, R., Gerger, H., & Barth, J. (2013). Researcher allegiance in psychotherapy outcome research: An overview of reviews. Clinical Psychology Review, 33, 501–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nee, C., White, M., Woolford, K., Pascu, T., Barker, L., & Wainwright, L. (2015). New methods for examining expertise in burglars in natural and simulated environments: Preliminary findings. Psychology, Crime & Law, 21, 507–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pithers, W. D. (1999). Empathy: Definition, enhancement and relevance to the treatment of sexual abusers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 257–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Preacher, K. J. (2015). Advances in mediation analysis: A survey and synthesis of new developments. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 825–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Romer, D., Duckworth, A. L., Sznitman, S., & Park, S. (2010). Can adolescents learn self-control? Delay of gratification in the development of control over risk taking. Prevention Science, 11, 319–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ross, R. R., & Fabiano, E. A. (1985). Time to think: A cognitive model of delinquency prevention and offender rehabilitation. Johnson City, TN: Institute of Social Sciences and Arts.Google Scholar
  31. Tafrate, R. C., & Mitchell, D. (Eds.). (2014). Forensic CBT: A handbook for clinical practice. Chichester, England: Wiley.Google Scholar
  32. Walters, G. D. (2003). Changes in criminal thinking and identity in novice and experienced prison inmates: Prisonization revisited. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30, 399–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Walters, G. D. (2007). Measuring proactive and reactive criminal thinking with the PICTS: Correlations with outcome expectancies and hostile attribution biases. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 371–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Walters, G. D. (2012). Criminal thinking and recidivism: Meta-analytic evidence on the predictive and incremental validity of the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS). Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17, 272–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Walters, G. D. (2014a). Crime and substance misuse in adjudicated delinquent youth: The worst of both worlds. Law and Human Behavior, 38, 139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Walters, G. D. (2014b). Drugs, crime, and their relationships: Theory, research, practice, and policy. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett.Google Scholar
  37. Walters, G. D. (2015a). Criminal and substance involvement from adolescence to adulthood: Precursors, mediators, and long-term effects. Justice Quarterly, 32, 729–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Walters, G. D. (2015b). Proactive criminal thinking and the transmission of differential association: A cross-lagged multi-wave path analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42, 1128–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Walters, G. D. (2015c). Recidivism and the “worst of both worlds” hypothesis: Do substance misuse and crime interact or accumulate? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42, 435–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Walters, G. D. (2016a). Age of crime/substance onset and crime/drug versatility as dimensions of the “worst of both worlds” effect. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 27, 668–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Walters, G. D. (2016b). Breaking the Cycle Demonstration Project: Using a quasi-experimental analysis to test the “worst of both worlds” hypothesis and risk principle. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 12, 127–141.Google Scholar
  42. Walters, G. D. (2016c). Friends, cognition, and delinquency: Proactive and reactive criminal thinking as mediators of the peer influence and peer selection effects among male delinquents. Justice Quarterly, 33, 1055–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Walters, G. D. (2016d). Mediating the distal crime-drug relationship with proximal reactive criminal thinking. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 30, 128–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Walters, G. D. (2016e). Proactive and reactive criminal thinking, psychological inertia, and the crime continuity conundrum. Journal of Criminal Justice, 46, 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Walters, G. D. (2017a). Child and adolescent maltreatment as a mediator of continuity in both callous-unemotional traits and low self-control. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  46. Walters, G. D. (2017b). Reactive criminal thinking as a consequence of low self-control and prior offending. Deviant Behavior, 38, 119–129.Google Scholar
  47. Walters, G. D. (in press-a). The drug-crime connection in adolescent and adult respondents: Interaction versus addition. Journal of Drug Issues.Google Scholar
  48. Walters, G. D. (in press-b). Effect of a brief cognitive behavioural intervention on criminal thinking and prison misconduct in male inmates: Variable-oriented and person-oriented analyses. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health.Google Scholar
  49. Walters, G. D. (in press-c). Proactive and reactive criminal thinking and self-reported offending: A cross-national survey of 7th thru 9th grade boys and girls. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology.Google Scholar
  50. Walters, G. D. (in press-d). Psychological inertia revisited: Replicating and extending the differential effect of proactive and reactive criminal thinking on crime continuity. Deviant Behavior.Google Scholar
  51. Walters, G. D. (in press-e). Sibling delinquency as a risk factor for future offending: An exploratory analysis. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice.Google Scholar
  52. Walters, G. D., & Kiehl, K. A. (2015). Limbic correlates of fearlessness and disinhibition in incarcerated youth: Exploring the brain-behavior relationship with the Hare Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version. Psychiatry Research, 230, 205–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Walters, G. D., & Lowenkamp, C. T. (2016). Predicting recidivism with the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS) in community-supervised male and female federal offenders. Psychological Assessment, 28, 652–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Walters, G. D., & Magaletta, P. R. (2015). Comorbid antisocial and substance misuse proclivity and mental health service utilization by female inmates: Testing the worst of both worlds hypothesis with the PAI. Psychological Services, 12, 28–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Walters, S. T., Clark, M. D., Gingerich, R., & Meltzer, M. L. (2007). Motivating offenders to change: A guide for probation and parole (NIC#022253). Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections.Google Scholar
  56. Walters, G. D., Frederick, A. A., & Schlauch, C. (2007). Postdicting arrests for proactive and reactive aggression with the PICTS Proactive and Reactive composite scales. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 1415–1430.Google Scholar
  57. Webster, S. D., Bowers, L. E., Mann, R. E., & Marshall, W. L. (2005). Developing empathy in sexual offenders: The value of offense re-enactments. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 17, 63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kutztown UniversityKutztownUSA

Personalised recommendations