Abstract
The phenomenon of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) was discovered and studied in the 1950s of the twentieth century. Two groups of British physicists under the leadership of Bloch and Pursell determined physical and chemical factors, such as proton density and the so-called relaxation parameters, times of longitudinal (T1) and transverse (T2) substance relaxation, on which the value of the detected MR signal depended. Hahn (1950) developed an in vitro method for measuring the substance relaxation parameters using a sequence of radio pulses, called a pulse sequence (PS) “spin echo” (SE) (Hahn 1950; Bloch and Pursell 1952).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Akeson P, Larsson E, Kristoffersen D, et al. Brain metastases – comparison of gadodiamide injection-enhanced MR imaging at standard and high dose, contrast-enhanced CT and non-contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Acta Radiol. 1995;36(3):300–6.
Alsop D, Detre J, Golay X, et al. Recommended implementation of arterial spin-labeled perfusion MRI for clinical applications: a consensus of the ISMRM perfusion study group and the European consortium for ASL in dementia. Magn Reson Med. 2015;73(1):102–16.
Attenberger U, Runge V, Jackson C, et al. Comparative evaluation of lesion enhancement using 1 M gadobutrol vs. 2 conventional gadolinium chelates, all at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg, in a rat brain tumor model at 3 T. Investig Radiol. 2009;44:251–6.
Baert A, Sartor K. In: Jackson A, Buckley DL, Parker GJM, editors. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in oncology. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2005. p. 313.
Basser P, Pierpaoli C. A simplified method to measure the diffusion tensor from seven MR images. Magn Reson Med. 1998;39:928–34.
Basser P, Pierpaoli C. Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI. J Magn Reson B. 1996;111:209–19.
Bisese J. MRI of cranial metastasis. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI. 1992;3:473–83.
Bloch F, Hanson H, Packard M. Nuclear induction. Phys Rev. 1946;70:460–74.
Blouw B, et al. The hypoxic response of tumors is dependent on their microenvironment. Cancer Cell. 2003;4:133–46.
Cascino T, Byrne T, Deck M, Posner JB. Intra-arterial BCNU in the treatment of metastatic brain tumors. J Neuro-Oncol. 1983;1(3):211–8.
Cha S, Lupo J, Chen M, et al. Differentiation of glioblastoma multiforme and single brain metastasis by peak height and percentage of signal intensity recovery derived from dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging. Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28:1078–84.
Dolgushin MB, Pronin IN, Turkin AM, et al. 3D SWAN in the evaluation of the structure characteristics of glioblastoma brain metastases on a 3 Tl MR tomograph. J Med Imaging. 2012a;1:26–35.
Dolgushin MB, Pronin IN, Fadeeva LM, et al. The pulse sequence SWAN (3T) and CT perfusion in a comprehensive assessment of structural features of brain metastases and malignant gliomas. Radial Diagn Ther. 2012b;3:51–7.
Dolgushin MB. Abstract of dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Medical Sciences, Moscow. 2012.
Edelman R, Zlatkin M, Hesselink J. Clinical magnetic resonance imaging. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1996.
Gaddikeri S, Gaddikeri RS, Tailor T, et al. Dynamic contrast-enchanced MR imaging in head and neck cancer: techniques and clinical applications. Am J Neuroradiol. 2016;37(4):588–95.
Gasperini C, Paolillo A, Rovaris M, et al. A comparison of the sensitivity of MRI after double- and triple-dose Gd-DTPA for detecting enhancing lesions in multiple sclerosis. Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;18:761–3.
Griffith B, Jain R. Perfusion imaging in neuro-oncology basic techniques and clinical applications. J Pathol. 2015;53(3):497–511.
Guo A, Cummings T, Dash R, et al. Lymphomas and high grade astrocytomas: comparison of water diffusibility and histologic characteristics. Radiology. 2002;224:177–83.
Haacke E, Ayaz M, Khan A, et al. Establishing a baseline phase behavior in magnetic resonance imaging to determine normal vs. abnormal iron content in the brain. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;26:256–64.
Haacke E, Cheng N, House M, et al. Imaging iron stores in the brain using magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005;23(1):1–25.
Haacke E, Tang J, Neelavalli J, et al. Susceptibility mapping as a means to visualize veins and quantify oxygen saturation. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010;32:663–76.
Hahn E. Spin echoes. Phys Rev. 1950;80:580–94.
Huisman T, Sorensen A. Perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the brain: techniques and application in children. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:59–72.
Järnum H, Steffensen E, Knutsson L. Perfusion MRI of brain tumours: a comparative study of pseudo-continuous arterial spin labelling and dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging. Neuroradiology. 2010;52(4):307–17.
Koh D, Collins D. Diffusion Weighted MRI in the body: application in oncology. AJR. 2007;188(6):1622–35.
Konovalov AN, Kornienko VN, Pronin IN. Magnetic resonance imaging in neurosurgery. Moscow: Vidar; 1997a. p. 471.
Konovalov AN, Kornienko VN, Pronin IN. Magnetic resonance imaging in neurosurgery. Moscow: Vidar; 1997b. p. 472.
Konovalov AN, Kornienko VN, Pronin IN. Magnetic resonance imaging in neurosurgery. Vidar: Moscow; 1997c.
Kornienko VN, Pronin IN. Diagnostic neuroradiology, vol. 1. Moscow: Andreeva TM; 2008a. p. 454.
Kornienko VN, Pronin IN, editors. Neuroimaging: selected articles (2000–2007). Moscow: Andreeva TM; 2008b. p. 256.
Kornienko VN, Pronin IN, et al. Neuroradiology. Current state and prospects of development. In: Konovalov AN, editor. Modern technologies and clinical research in neurosurgery, vol. 1. Moscow: Alexeeva TM; 2012. p. 113–58.
Kornienko VN, Pronin IN, Pyanykh OS, Fadeeva LM. A study of brain tissue perfusion by computed tomography. J Med Imaging. 2007;2:70–81.
Kornienko VN, Pronin IN. Contrast enhancement in neuroradiology. Moscow: Alexeeva TM; 2010. p. 256.
Kornienko VN, Pronin IN. Diagnostic neuroradiology, vol. 2. Moscow: Andreeva TM; 2009a. p. 462.
Kornienko VN, Pronin IN. Diagnostic neuroradiology, vol. 3. Moscow: Andreeva TM; 2009b. p. 463.
Kornienko V, Pronin I. Diagnostic neuroradiology. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2009c. p. 1388.
Kornienko VN, Pronin IN. Diagnostic neuroradiology, vol. III. Moscow: Andreeva TM; 2009d. p. 182–346.
Le Bihan D, Breton E. Imagieri de diffusion in-vivo par resonance magnetique. C R Acad Sci (II). 1985;15:1109–12.
Le Bihan D, Turner R, Mooner C, et al. Imaging of diffusion and microvasculation with gradient sensitization: design, strategy and significance. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1991;1:7–28.
Le Bihan D, van Zijl P. From the diffusion coefficient to the diffusion tensor. NMR Biomed. 2002;15:431–4.
Lee B, Vo K, Lim T. NMR Venography using susceptibility effect produced by deoxyhemoglobin. Magn Reson Med. 1992;28:25–38.
Leenders W, Kusters B, Pikkemaat J. Vascular endothelial growth factor-A determines detectability of experimental melanoma brain metastasis in GD-DTPA-enhanced MRI. Int J Cancer. 2003;105:437–43.
Lowther E, Whitlow C, Maldjian J. Clinical applications of ASL brain perfusion imaging, chapter 14. In: Saremi F, editor. Perfusion imaging in clinical practice. A multimodality approach to tissue perfusion analysis. New York: Wolters Klumer; 2015. p. 240–61.
Lu S, Ahn D, Johnson G, et al. Peritumoral diffusion tensor imaging of high-grade gliomas and metastatic brain tumors. Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24(5):937–41.
Mansfield P. Multi-planar image-formation using NMR spin echoes. J Phys C Solid State Phys. 1977;10:55–8.
Mintz A., Perry J, Cairncross G. Management of single brain metastases. Practice guideline report 9-1. 2004.
Mitomo M, Kawai R, Miura T, et al. Radiation necrosis of the brain and radiation-induced cerebrovasculopathy. Acta Radiol Suppl. 1986;369:227–30.
Moritani T, Hiwatashi A, Shrier D, et al. CNS vasculitis and vasculopathy: efficacy and usefulness of diffusion-weighted echoplanar MR imaging. Clin Imaging. 2004;28:261–70.
Murase K. Dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion CT: basic of mathematical tracer kinetic models and applications. Chapter 4. In: Saremi F, editor. Perfusion imaging in clinical practice. A multimodality approach to tissue perfusion analysis. New York: Wolters Klumer; 2015. p. 62–76.
Nechipay EA, Dolgushin MB, Pronin IN, et al. DCE MRI in Differential Diagnosis of Primary and Secondary Brain Tumors. J Medical Imaging. 2015;4:18–30.
Nemeth A, Henson J, Mullins M, et al. Improved detection of skull metastasis with diffusion weighted MR imaging. Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28(6):1088–92.
Nussbaum E, Djalilian H, Cho K, et al. Brain metastases. Histology, multiplicity, surgery, and survival. Cancer. 1996;78(8):1781–8.
Osborn AG. Diagnostic neuroradiology. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby; 1994.
Ostergaard L. Principles of cerebral perfusion imaging by bolus tracking. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005;22(6):710–7.
Pizzinni F, Smits M, Wesolowski R, et al. Arterial spin-labeled MR perfusion imaging techniques. Chapter 9. In: Saremi F, editor. Perfusion imaging in clinical practice a multimodality approach to tissue perfusion analysis. New York: Wolters Klumer; 2015. p. 149–81.
Pronin IN, Kornienko VN, Fadeeva LM, et al. Diffusion-weighted images in the study of brain tumors and peritumoral edema. J Issues Neurosurgery. 2000;3:14–7.
Pronin IN, Turkin AM, Dolgushin MB, et al. Tissue contrast due to magnetic susceptibility: application in neuroradiology. J Med Imaging. 2011;2:4.
Pursell E, Toney H, Pound R. Resonance absorption by nuclear magnetic moments in a solid. Phys Rev. 1946;69:37–83.
Reichenbach J. High resolution blood oxygenation level dependent MR venography (HRVG): a new technique. Neuroradiology. 2001;43:364–9.
Remler M, Marcussen W, Tiller-Borsich J. The late effects of radiation on the blood brain barrier. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1986;12:1965–9.
Rink P. Magnetic resonance in medicine. Translation by prof. E.I. Fedin. Oxford: Blackwell; 2003.
Roberts T. Physiologic measurements by contrast-enhanced MR imaging: evaluate expectations and limitations. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1997;7:82–90.
Rowley H, Scialfa G, Gao P, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of brain lesions: a large-scale intraindividual crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine versus gadodiamide. Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:1684–91.
Saremi F. Perfusion imaging in clinical practice. A multimodality approach to tissue perfusion analysis. New York: Wolters Klumer; 2015. p. 592.
Shiroishi M, Castellazzi G, Boxerman J, et al. Principles of T2*-weighted dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI technique in brain tumor imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;41:296–313.
Sorensen A, Reimer P. Cerebral MR perfusion imaging: principles and current applications. New York: Thieme; 2000.
Sze G, Johnson C, Kawamura Y, et al. Comparison of single- and triple-dose contrast material in the MR screening of brain metastases. Am J Neuroradiol. 1998;19:821–8.
Takahara T, Imai Y, Yamashita T, et al. Diffusion weighted whole body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS): technical improvement using free breathing, STIR and high resolution 3D display. Radiat Med. 2004;22:275–82.
Tatsuno S, Hata Y, Tada S. Double-dose Gd-DTPA: detectability of intraparenchymal brain metastasis (in Japanese). Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi. 1996;56:855–9.
Tofts P, Brix G, Buckley D, et al. Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusible tracer: standardized quantities and symbols. Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;10(3):223–32.
Tofts P, Kermode A. Measurement of the blood–brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging. 1. Fundamental concepts. Magn Reson Med. 1991;17:357–67.
Tofts P. Quantitative MRI of the brain. Chichester: Wiley; 2004. p. 633.
Tourdias T, Rodrigo S, Oppenheim C, et al. Pulsed arterial spin labeling applications in brain tumors: practical review. J Neuroradiol. 2008;35:79–89.
Vogl TJ, Friebe CE, Balzer T, et al. Diagnosis of cerebral metastasis with standard dose gadobutrol vs. a high dose protocol: intraindividual evaluation of a phase II high dose study (in German). Radiologe. 1995;35:508–16.
Wang S, Kim S, Chawla S, et al. Differentiation between glioblastomas, solitary brain metastases, and primary cerebral lymphomas using diffusion tensor and dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32:507–14.
Weidner N. Tumoural vascularity as a prognostic factor in cancer patients: the evidence continues to grow. J Pathol. 1998;184(2):119–22.
Werner M, Burger P, Heinz E, et al. Intracranial atherosclerosis following radiotherapy. Neurology. 1988;38(7):1158–60.
Wetzel S, Cha S, Johnson G, et al. Relative cerebral blood volume measurements in intracranial mass lesions: interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility study. Radiology. 2002;224:797–803.
Wolf R, Detre J. Clinical neuroimaging using arterial spin-labeled perfusion magnetic resonance imaging. Neurotherapeutics. 2007;4:346–59.
Yamaguchi N, Yamashima T, Yamashita J. A histological and flow cytometric study of dog brain endothelial cell injuries in delayed radiation necrosis. J Neurosurg. 1991;74:625–32.
Yamasaki F, Kurisu K, Satoh K, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient of human brain tumors at MR imaging. Radiology. 2005;235:985–91.
Yuh W, Engelken J, Muhonen M, et al. Experience with high-dose gadolinium MR imaging in the evaluation of brain metastases. Am J Neuroradiol. 1992;13:335–45.
Zakharova NE, Kornienko VN, Potapov AA, et al. Neuroimaging of structural and hemodynamic abnormalities in brain injury. Moscow; 2013. p. 156.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dolgushin, M., Kornienko, V., Pronin, I. (2018). Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). In: Brain Metastases. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57760-9_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57760-9_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57758-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57760-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)