Skip to main content

The Role of Formative Assessment in a Blended Learning Course

Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS,volume 653)

Abstract

Assessing the effectiveness of a course design in higher education is an almost unfeasible task. The practical inability to conduct randomised controlled trials in a natural setting limits teachers who want to interpret their design choices to non causal evaluation. With at least a moderate amount of common sense these evaluations could be useful in gathering insight into what works and what does not work in education. In our blended learning course we wanted to assess the role of formative assessment while also taking lecture attendance into account. There are certainly many confounds for which we cannot control. We found no effect of lecture attendance but formative assessments did predict a substantial amount of course outcome. This was probably due to not including the formative performance in the final grading and our emphasis in the course that to err is to be student. The validity of the formative assessment paves the way for diagnostic use and remedial teaching.

Keywords

  • Formative assessment
  • Blended learning
  • Lecture attendance
  • Weblectures

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-57744-9_6
  • Chapter length: 9 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-319-57744-9
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

References

  1. Black, P., Wiliam, D.: Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educ. Assess. Eval. Account. 21(1), 5–31 (2009)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  2. Bos, N., Groeneveld, C., Bruggen van, J Brand-Gruwel, S.: The use of recorded lectures in education and the impact on lecture attendance and exam performance. Br. J. Educ. Technol. (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dweck, C.S.: Self-theories: Their Role in Motivation Personality and Development. Psychology Press, Philadelphia (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Freeman, S., Eddy, S.L., Mcdonough, E., Mcdonough, M., Smith, M.K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., Wenderoth, M.: Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Core Team: R: a language and environment for statistical computing (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211, 453–458 (1981)

    MathSciNet  CrossRef  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sharon Klinkenberg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Klinkenberg, S. (2017). The Role of Formative Assessment in a Blended Learning Course. In: Joosten-ten Brinke, D., Laanpere, M. (eds) Technology Enhanced Assessment. TEA 2016. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 653. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57744-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57744-9_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57743-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57744-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)