Abstract
This tribute begins with a recollection of my friendship with Joe and Judith, which led to rewarding contacts with Charlie Sawyer, Cherie Hoyt, Jancis Long and Mark and Ieva Notturno. Intellectually, Joe encouraged me to cast caution to the winds and unpack the implications of Popper’s ideas on objective knowledge and non-justificationism without being distracted by the arguments about whether objective knowledge exists. He contributed directly to economics in partnership with Klappholz and indirectly through his pupil Larry Boland, who in turn mentored Stanley Wong. The story moves on to some little appreciated aspects and implications of Popper’s thoughts; the synergy between Popper and the Austrian school of economics; the role of the moral framework of society; his early engagement with the problem of paradigms (his criticism of conventionalism); his warning about the danger of Big Science; his influence on Gordon Tullock. There is a reminder of the treasure trove of material on the website of Joe’s friend and collaborator Ian Jarvie. In view of their close partnership, this is a tribute to Joe as well as to Ian. There is some criticism which Joe will see as the most enjoyable part of the paper. And last but not least, no tribute to Joe would be complete without a mention of his life partner and collaborator Judith.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agassi, J. 1968. The novelty of Popper’s philosophy of science. International Philosophical Quarterly 8: 1968.
Agassi, J., and A. Meidan. 2016. Beg to differ. The logic of disputes and argumentation. Springer.
Bartley, W.W. 1964. Rationality versus the theory of rationality. In The critical approach to science and to philosophy, ed. M. Bunge, 3–31. New York: The Free Press.
———. 1984. The retreat to commitment. 2nd ed. La Salle: Open Court.
Butos, William N. 1987. Rhetoric and rationality: A review essay of McCloskey’s The rhetoric of economics. Eastern Economic Journal 13 (3): 295–304.
Butos, William N., and Thomas J. McQuade. 2015. Causes and consequences of the climate science boom. The Independent Review 20 (2):165-196. http://www.independent.org/publications/tir/article.asp?a=1080.
Carlin, A. 2015. Environmentalism gone mad: Environmentalism gone mad: How a Sierra Club activist and senior EPA analyst discovered a radical green energy fantasy. Mount Vernon: Stairway Press.
Champion, R. 2013a. Hayek, Bartley and Popper: Justificationism and the abuse of reason. In Hayek: A collaborative biography. Part I Influences from Mises to Bartley, ed. R. Leeson, 213–225. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
———. 2013b. Guide to The Open Society and its enemies. Amazon. https://www.amazon.com/Guide-Society-Enemies-Popular-Popper-ebook/dp/B00C6RHIGO/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1483093545&sr=8-2&keywords=rafe+champion.
———. 2013c. Commentary on Hayek. Amazon. https://www.amazon.com/Commentary-Hayek-Critical-Rationalist-Papers-ebook/dp/B00E0L8AR0/ref=sr_1_6?ie=UTF8&qid=1482889945&sr=8-6&keywords=rafe+champion.
———. 2015. Reason and imagination. Amazon. https://www.amazon.com/Reason-Imagination-thoughts-William-Bartley/dp/1507512112/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&qid=1483093591&sr=8-4&keywords=rafe+champion.
———. 2016a. What happened to climate science? Joining the dots. http://catallaxyfiles.com/2016/10/11/what-happened-to-climate-science-the-dots/.
———. 2016b. Gordon Tullock on induced curiosity and the decline of scientific integrity. http://catallaxyfiles.com/2016/10/18/climate-science-7-gordon-tullock-on-induced-curiosity-and-the-decline-of-scientific-integrity/.
Cook, J., D. Nuccitelli, A. Green Sarah, Richardson Mark, Winkler Barbel, Painting Rob, Way Robert, Jacobs Peter, and Skuce Andrew. 2013. Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic warming in the scientific literature. Environmental Research Letters 8: 024024. http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024/meta.
Eisenhower, D.D. 1961. Address to the nation. http://www.eisenhower.archives.gov/research/online_documents/farewell_address/Reading_Copy.pdf.
Hands, D.W. 2001. Reflection without rules: Economic methodology and contemporary science theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
James, Roger. 1980. Return to reason: Popper’s thought in social life. Wells Somerset: Open Books.
Jarvie, Ian C. Website. http://www.yorku.ca/jarvie.
———. 1989–1990. Philosophy and its problems. http://www.yorku.ca/jarvie/online_publications/WWBIII.pdf.
———. 1999. Rationality and situational logic in Popper’s scientific work. http://www.yorku.ca/jarvie/online_publications/VIENNAWD.pdf.
———. 2000. The republic of science: The emergence of Popper’s social view of science 1935–1945. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Klappholz, K., and J. Agassi. 1959. Methodological prescriptions in economics. Economica 26: 60–74.
Lester, Jan C. 2000. Escape from Leviathan. London: Macmillan.
Long, J. 1998. Lakatos in Hungary. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 28 (2): 244–311.
McCloskey, D.N. 2006. The discreet virtues of the bourgeoisie: How Europe after 1600 half escaped the ancient condemnation of economic life. History Today 56(9). http://www.historytoday.com/deirdre-mccloskey/discreet-virtues-bourgeoisie.
———. 2010. Bourgeois dignity: Why economics can’t explain the modern world. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Michaels, Patrick J., and Paul C. Knappenberger. 2016. Lukewarming: The new climate science that changes everything. Washington, DC: Cato Institute.
Mirowski, P. 2006. Introduction to new edition Stanley Wong. The foundations of Paul Samuelson’s revealed preference theory. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.401.3046&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
Morano, Marc. 2013. The BIG LIE: Sceptics funded by Big Oil -no, the Alarmists are. http://www.climatedepot.com/2013/07/24/the-big-lie-sceptics-funded-by-big-oil-no-the-alarmists-are/ 30 Dec 2016.
Morris, P. 2016. Obituary—Peter Munz. http://nzbooks.org.nz/2006/obituaries/obituary-peter-munz/.
———. 1963. Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
———. 1972. Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
———. 2008. After The Open Society, ed. J. Shearmur and P.N. Turner. London: Routledge.
Richards, Kenneth. 2016. The sun-climate connection. http://notrickszone.com/2016/11/21/the-sun-climate-connection-over-100-scientific-papers-from-2016-link-solar-forcing-to-climate-change/#sthash.RsP42PRx.dpbs.
Samuelson, P.A. 1964. Theory and realism: A reply. The American Economic Review 54 (5): 736–739.
Shollenberger, Brandon. 2016. The climate wars: How the consensus is enforced. Amazon. https://www.amazon.com.au/Climate-Wars-How-Consensus-Enforced-ebook/dp/B01CEZLAM0.
Simkin, C. 1993. Popper’s views on natural and social science. New York: Brill.
———. 2001. John and Ursula Hicks – A personal recollection. In John Hicks: His contributions to economic theory and practice, ed. K. Puttaswamaiah, 5–14. London: Transaction Publishers. http://www.the-rathouse.com/Colin_Simkin_on_John_Hicks.pdf.
Smith, Barry. 1990. Aristotle, Menger, Mises: An essay in the metaphysics of economics. In Carl Menger and his legacy in economics. Annual supplement to volume 22 History of political economy, ed. Caldwell Bruce, 263–288. London: Duke University Press.
———. 1996. In defense of extreme (fallibilistic) apriorism. Journal of Libertarian Studies 12: 179–192.
Smith, Huston. 1982. Beyond the post-modern mind. New York: Crossroad.
Spencer, R. 2014. http://www.drroyspencer.com/wp-content/uploads/CMIP5-90-models-global-Tsfc-vs-obs-thru-2013.png.
Vaughn, Karen. 1994. Austrian economics in America: The migration of a tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weimer, W.B. 1979. Notes on the methodology of scientific research. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wikipedia. 2016. The Heartland Institute. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Heartland_Institute. 30 December 2016.
Wong, S. 1978. 2nd ed 2006 Foundations of Paul Samuelson’s revealed preference theory: A study by the method of rational reconstruction. London: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Champion, R. (2017). Joe Agassi, Intellectual Irritant. In: Bar-Am, N., Gattei, S. (eds) Encouraging Openness. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol 325. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57669-5_39
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57669-5_39
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57668-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57669-5
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)