Skip to main content

Hysterectomy or Not Hysterectomy That Is the Question!

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for Beginners
  • 644 Accesses

Abstract

Hysterectomy, subtotal if possible, should be decided according to the clinical needs first (big uterus, cervical, endo or myometrial lesion) and according to the patient’s wishes. There is no systematic attitude and every individual case has to be discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Emge LA, Durfee RB. Pelvic organ prolapse: four thousand years of treatment. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1996;9:997–1032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pan K, Cao L, Ryan NA, Wang Y, Xu H. Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Jan;27(1):93–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Myers EM, Siff L, Osmundsen B, Geller E, Matthews CA. Differences in recurrent prolapse at 1 year after total vs supracervical hysterectomy and robotic sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Apr;26(4):585–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Crane AK, Geller EJ, Sullivan S, Robinson BL, Myers EM, Horton C, Matthews CA. Short-term mesh exposure after robotic sacrocolpopexy with and without concomitant hysterectomy. South Med J. 2014 Oct;107(10):603–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vallabh-Patel V, Saiz C, Salamon C, Francis A, Pagnillo J, Culligan P. Prevalence of occult malignancy within morcellated specimens removed during laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016 Jul–Aug;22(4):190–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Massou E, Chéret A, Marcus-Braun N, von Theobald P. Laparoscopic sacro(hystero)colpopexy: twenty years after. Women’s Health & Gynecology. 2016 Apr 7. http://scientonline.org/open-access/laparoscopic-sacrohysterocolpopexy-twenty-years-after.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

von Theobald, P. (2017). Hysterectomy or Not Hysterectomy That Is the Question!. In: Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for Beginners. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57636-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57636-7_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57635-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57636-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics