Skip to main content

From ‘Awkward Partner’ to ‘Awkward Partnership’? Explaining Norway’s Paradoxical Relations with the European Union

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Nordic States and European Integration

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics ((PSEUP))

Abstract

Norway is the only Nordic state to have rejected membership of the European Union four times. Applying the conceptual lens of ‘awkwardness’, as developed by Murray et al. (2014), it seems fair to consider the country as an awkward partner in the process of European integration. As a member of the European Economic Area (EEA), however, Norway has been tightly associated with the European Union ever since 1994, actively participating in a large number of EU policies and programs and effectively forging a close partnership that has in itself become increasingly ‘awkward’. This holds true despite the fact that successive Norwegian governments have recently started to embrace a generally more reserved attitude with regard to the EU, particularly in relation to the implementation of several EU directives. As a member of both Nordic and European cooperation, Norway aims at dissipating potential concerns for being perceived as awkward—despite the complexities created by its non-membership of the EU. We argue that Norwegian ‘awkwardness’ has resulted in an awkward’ relationship between Norway and the EU that is predominantly rooted in the domestic political sphere (relations between Norwegian political elites and the electorate, and among the political parties), although this has also been shaped by the EU’s incapacity to deal with a series of economic and political crises over the past few years.

*The authors are grateful to the comments by Alex Brianson, Tarvo Kungla, Benjamin Leruth, Malin McCallion Stegmann, Philomena Murray and Frode Veggeland as well as the participants of the panel on “Awkward States” at the UACES annual conferences in Bilbao, September 6–9, 2015 and London, September 5–7, 2016 as well as the international politics panel at the Norwegian Political Science Congress, Kristiansand, January 6–8, 2016.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allern, E.H., and J. Saglie. 2012. Inside the Black Box: Parties as Multi-level Organisations in a Unitary State. West European Politics 35 (5): 947–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, Clive. 2005. Norway Outside the European Union. Norway and European Integration from 1994 to 2004. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, M.W., and S. Becker. 2014. The Unexpected Winner of the Crisis: the European Commission’s Strengthened Role in Economic Governance. Journal of European Integration 36(3): 213–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, Tom. 2003. Narratives of Norwegian Governance: Elaborating the Strong State Tradition. Public Administration 81 (1): 163–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, Tom, and Per Lægreid. 2004. Public Administration Research in Norway: Organization Theory, Institutionalism and Empirical Studies in a Democratic Context. Public Administration 82 (3): 679–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claes, Dag Harald. 2003. EØS-avtalen – mellom diplomati og democrati [The EEA-Agreement. Between Diplomacy and Democracy]. Internasjonal politikk 61 (3): 275–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagbladet. 2014. Massiv norsk EU-motstand. Det er fire ganger så mange EU-motstandere som EU-tilhengere i Norge, viser en ny meningsmåling fra Sentio Research. Available online at: http://www.dagbladet.no/2014/08/30/nyheter/meningsmalinger/politikk/eu/35038965/. Accessed 12 Dec 2015.

  • Darvas, Zolt. 2016. Single Market Access from Outside the EU: Three Key Prerequisites, Blog Post July 19. Available online at: http://bruegel.org/2016/07/single-market-access-from-outside-the-eu-three-key-prerequisites/. Accessed 14 Sept 2016.

  • EEA Review Committee. 2012. Norway’s Agreements with the European Union, Submitted to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on 17 January 2012, Oslo, (Europautredningen). Available online: https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/nou-2012-2/id669368/. Accessed 12 Sept 2015.

  • Egeberg, M. 2006. Multilevel Union Administration. The Transformation of Executive Politics in Europe, Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egeberg, M., and J. Trondal. 1999. Differentiated Integration in Europe: The Case of EEA Country, Norway. Journal of Common Market Studies 37 (1): 133–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egeberg, M., and J. Trondal. 2011. EU-level Agencies: New Executive Centre Formation or Vehicles of National Control? Journal of European Public Policy 18 (6): 868–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egeberg, M., and J. Trondal. 2014. Nasjonal administrative suverenitet – myte eller realitet?. Det Norske Paradoks. Om Norges Forhold til den Europeiske Union, eds. E.O. Eriksen and J.E. Fossum, 153–173. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, Erik O., and John Erik Fossum (eds.). 2015. The European Union’s Non-members. Independence Under Hegemony? London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, Erik O., and John Erik Fossum (red.). 2014. Det norske paradoks. Om Norges forhold til den Europeiske Union. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2012. A Review of the Functioning of the European Economic Area. Commission Staff Working Document, SWD (2012) 425 Final, Brussels, 7.12.2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fossum, John Erik. 2010. Norway’s European ‘gag rules’. European Review 18 (1): 73–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fossum, John Erik. 2015. Representation under Hegemony. On Norway’s relation to the EU. The European Union’s Non-Members: Independence under Hegemony, eds. Erik O. Eriksen and J.E. Fossum, 77–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finstad, Fredrik Bøckman. 2008. Norges tilknytning til EUs justis-og innenrikspolitikk [Norway’s association with the EU’s policy on justice and internal affairs]. Nytt Norsk Tidsskrift 4: 336–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genschel, Philipp and Jachtenfuchs, Markus. eds. 2014. Beyond the Regulatory Polity? The European Integration of Core State Powers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gstöhl, Sieglinde. 2002. Reluctant Europeans. Norway, Sweden and Switzerland in the Process of Integration. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henökl, T. 2014. Conceptualizing the European Diplomatic Space: A Framework for Analysis of the European External Action Service. Journal of European Integration 36 (5): 453–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillion, Christoph. 2011. Integrating an Outsider. An EU Perspective on Relations with Norway, Europautredningen, Rapport 16, Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmøyvik, Eirik. 2015. Norway’s Constitutional Acrobatics under the EEA Agreement. The European Union’s Non-members Independence under Hegemony? eds. Eirik O. Eriksen and J.E. Fossum, 137–152. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingebritsen, Christine. 1998. The Nordic States and European Unity. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingebritsen, Christine. 2001. When Do Culture and History Matter? A Response to Neumann and Tiilikainen. Cooperation and Conflict 36 (1): 99–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennifer, Welsh. 2004. At Home in the World: Canada’s Global Vision for the 21st Century. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lægreid, Per, and Johan P. Olsen. [1978] 1987. Byråkrati og Beslutninger, En studie av norske department. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lægreid, Per, and Johan P. Olsen. 1984. Top Civil Servants in Norway: Key Players—On Different Teams. In Bureaucrats and Policy Making, ed. E.N. Suleiman. New York: Holmes and Meier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiren, M.D. 2015. Scope of Negative Integration: A Comparative Analysis of Post, Public Transport and Port Services. Journal of Common Market Studies 53 (3): 609–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leruth, Benjamin, and Christopher Lord. 2015. Differentiated Integration in the European Union: A Concept, a Process, a System or a Theory? Journal of European Public Policy 22 (6): 754–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leuffen, Dirk, Rittberger, Berthold and Schimmelfennig Frank. 2013. Differentiated Integration: Explaining Variation in the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, Philomena. 2015. Drivers of Regional Integration: Some Comparative Considerations. In Drivers of Integration and Regionalism in Europe and Asia, ed. Louis Brennan and Philomena Murray. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, Philomena, Alex Warleigh-Lack, and Baogang He. 2014. Awkward States and Regional Organisations: The United Kingdom and Australia Compared. Comparative European Politics 12 (3): 279–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, Iver B. 2001. The Nordic States and European Unity, Coooperation and Conflict 36 (1): 87–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, Iver B. (2002). This Little Piggy Stayed at Home: Why Norway is Not a Member of the EU. European Integration and National Identity: The Challenge of the Nordic States, eds. Lene Hansen and Ole Wæver, 88–129. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norwegian Government. n.d. The Nordic Defence Cooperation (NORDEFCO), Accessed on December 9, 2015. Available online at: https://www.regjeringen.no/en/topics/defence/international-operations/nordisk-forsvarssamarbeid—nordefco/id2350954/. Accessed 12 Sep 2015.

  • Norwegian Radio and Television. 2013. Vikingene er maskuline ikoner (Vikings are Masculine Icons), Accessed on December 9, 2015. Available online at: http://www.nrk.no/ytring/vikingene-er-maskuline-ikoner-1.11168104. Accessed 12 Sept 2015.

  • Olsen, Johan P. 2014. Folkestyrets varige spenninger. Stortinget og den norske politiske selvforståelsen. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Development and Cooperation (OECD). 2011. Country Assessment for Norway. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Østerud, Øyvind, Fredrik Engelstad, and Per Selle. 2003. Makten og demokratiet. En sluttbok fra Makt- og Demokratiutredningen. Olso: Gyldendal Akademisk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panke, Diana. 2010. Small States in the European Union: Structural Disadvantages in EU Policymaking and Counter-strategies. Journal of European Public Policy 17 (6): 799–817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokkan, Stein. 1987. Stat, nasjon, klasse. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selle, Per, and Øyvind Østerud. 2006. The Eroding of Representative Democracy in Norway. Journal of European Public Policy 13 (4): 551–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stie, Anne Elizabeth. 2012. Democratic Decision-making in the EU: Technocracy in Disguise? London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strøm, K., Narud, H. M. and H. Valen. 2005. A More fragile Chain of Governance in Norway. West European Politics 28(4): 781–806.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sitter, Nick. 2005. When the Monnet Method is Not an Option: Norway, Schengen and Flexible Governance. Norwegian School of Management. The Centre for European and Asian Studies, Report 4, Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjursen, Helene. 2008. Integration Without Democracy? Three Conceptions of European Security Policy in Transformation. ARENA Working Papers, No. 7, Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjursen, Helene. 2015. Reinforcing Executive Dominance. Norway’s and the EU’s Foreign Policy. The European Union’s Non-Members: Independence under Hegemony, eds. Erik O. Eriksen and J.E. Fossum, 189–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanil, Gamze. 2012. Why is Norway Outside the European Union? Norwegian National Identity and the Question of European Integration (European University Studies). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. 2013. The Next Supermodel: Why the World Should Look at the Nordic Countries, Special Report on Scandinavia, 2 February 2013. Available online at: http://www.economist.com/printedition/2013-02-02. Accessed 12 Sept 2015.

  • Tiilikainen, Teija. 2001. Nordic Integration Policy Seen from Abroad. Cooperation and Conflict 36 (1): 87–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tranvik, Tommy, and Per Selle. 2007. State and Citizens in Norway. Organisational Society and State-municipal Relations. In Norway in Transition. Transforming an Stable Democracy, ed. Øyvind Østerud, 148–167. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vahl, Marius. 2009. 15 Anniversary of the EEA Agrement. EEA 1994–2009. Brussels: Drifosett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warleigh-Lack, Alex. 2006. Towards a Conceptual Framework for Regionalisation: Bridging ‘New Regionalism’ and ‘Integration Theory’. Review of International Political Economy 13 (5): 750–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Gänzle .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gänzle, S., Henökl, T. (2018). From ‘Awkward Partner’ to ‘Awkward Partnership’? Explaining Norway’s Paradoxical Relations with the European Union. In: Stegmann McCallion, M., Brianson, A. (eds) Nordic States and European Integration. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57562-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics