Advertisement

Unicornuate Uterus: Is There a Place for Hysteroscopic Management?

  • Sunita Tandulwadkar
  • Manasi Naralkar
Chapter

Abstract

Congenital uterine anomalies afflict 1–10% of the total population, 2–8% of infertile women, and 5–30% of women with a history of miscarriages. Unicornuate uterus, arising due to complete or near-complete arrested development of one of the Müllerian ducts, accounts for 4.4% of all uterine anomalies. It could be associated with renal anomalies, or absence of ipsilateral ovary. Pregnancy occurring in the unicornuate uterus is associated with an increased risk of first-trimester miscarriage, second-trimester loss, cervical incompetence, and a number of obstetric complications such as intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), preterm delivery, malpresentation, and intrauterine death. The poor obstetric outcomes may be a result of restricted expansion of an abnormal endometrial cavity and abnormal placental implantation. In literature, Xia and colleagues, in two separate case series, have reported improved obstetric outcome in unicornuate uterus after hysteroscopic transcervical uterine incision (TCUI). Considering the obvious fact that the poor obstetric outcome in unicornuate uteri is associated with low uterine volume and a tubular uterine cavity, and the evidence suggesting that women with uncorrected unicornuate uteri have recurrent miscarriages at serially increasing gestational ages, the treatment should be directed towards metroplasty which increases the uterine volume and converts the tubular cavity into a triangular cavity. With this principle in mind, we conducted hysteroscopic fundal and unilateral metroplasty in nine women with unicornuate uterus having mid-trimester abortions, in which we resected both vertically and laterally, keeping in mind the myometrial thickness to avoid perforation and weakening of the cavity. Of the nine cases, six patients conceived. Three of those who conceived continued pregnancy till 32 weeks, two patients till 36 weeks, one patient has an ongoing pregnancy of 23 weeks. Two patients have not conceived yet, and one patient was lost to follow-up. Postoperatively, the women were started on Estradiol valerate for 6 weeks, supplemented with Progesterone in the last 2 weeks. A second look hysteroscopy was performed on day 4–8 of menses after 6 weeks, which revealed an obvious increase in the volume of the cavity. Though this innovative surgery of unicornuate uterus has given promising results in our cases, its universal recommendation , needs larger studies. Hysteroscopy does have a role in the management of unicornuate uteri; however, the best results are only in the hands of the expert.

Keywords

Congenital uterine anomalies Unicornuate uterus Hysteroscopy Miscarriages Anomaly of Müllerian ducts Obstetric outcomes 

References

  1. 1.
    Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Tan A, Thornton JG, Coomarasamy A, Raine-Fenning NJ. Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38:371–82. doi: 10.1002/uog.10056.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Grimbizis GF, Campo R, Gordts S, Brucker S, Gergolet M, Tanos V, Li T-C, De Angelis C, Di Spiezio Sardo A, on behalf of the Scientific Committee of the Congenital Uterine Malformations (CONUTA) common ESHRE/ESGE working group. Clinical approach for the classification of congenital uterine malformations. Gynecol Surg. 2012;9:119–29. doi: 10.1007/s10397-011-0724-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chandler TM, Machan LS, Cooperberg PL, Harris AC, Chang SD. Mullerian duct anomalies: from diagnosis to intervention. Br J Radiol. 2009;82(984):1034–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Xia EL, Li TC, Choi SNS, Zhou QY. Reproductive outcome of transcervical uterine incision in unicornuate uterus. Chin Med J (Engl). 2017;130:256–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Taylor E, Gomel V. The uterus and fertility. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.09.069. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Venetis CA, et al. Clinical implications of congenital uterine anomalies: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;29(6):665–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Reichman D, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in unicornuate uteri: a review. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(5):1886–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lekovic J, Anderson S, Niemasik E, Chasen ST. Malperfusion as a possible mechanism of preterm labor in patients with uterine anomalies. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:S380. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Markham SM, Waterhouse TB. Structural anomalies of the reproductive tract. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1992;4:867–73. doi: 10.1097/00001703-199212000-00015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Xia EL, Peng XB, Ma N, Li YF, Xiao Y, Guo Y. Three cases of unicornuate uterus treated by transcervical incision of uterus metroplasty successfully pregnancy and literature review (in Chinese). Chin J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;45:689–91. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2013.09.013. Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Roddick JW Jr, Buckingham JC, Danforth DN. The muscular cervix – a cause of incompetency in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1961;17:562–5. doi: 10.1097/00006254-196110000-00005.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics & GynaecologyRuby Hall ClinicPuneIndia
  2. 2.Ruby Hall IVF & Endoscopy CentrePuneIndia
  3. 3.Solo Clinic, Centre of Excellence in Infertility & EndoscopyPuneIndia

Personalised recommendations