Advertisement

What’s New About Classification of Female Genital Anomalies?

Chapter

Abstract

Please check the hierarchy of the section headings and confirm if correct.

References

  1. 1.
    Grimbizis GF, Campo R. Congenital malformations of the female genital tract: the need for a new classification system. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:401–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    American Fertility Society. The AFS classification of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, mullerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril. 1988;49:944–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buttram VC, Gibbons WE. Mullerian anomalies: a proposed classification (an analysis of 144 cases). Fertil Steril. 1979;32:40–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Saravelos SH, Cocksedge KA, Li T-C. Prevalence and diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies in women with reproductive failure: a critical appraisal. Hum Reprod Update. 2008;14:415–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Acien P, Acien MI. The history of female genital tract malformation classifications and proposal of an updated system. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17:693–705.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Acien P, Acien M, Sanchez-Ferrer M. Complex malformations of the female genital tract. New types and revision of classification. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:2377–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Oppelt P, Renner SP, Brucker S, Strissel PL, Strick R, Oppelt PG, Doerr HG, Schott GE, Hucke J, Wallwiener D, Beckmann MW. The VCUAM (Vagina Cervix Uterus Adnex Associated Malformation) Classification: a new classification for genital malformations. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:1493–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rock JA, Carpenter SE, Wheeless CR, Jones HWJ. The clinical management of maldevelopment of the uterine cervix. J Pelv Surg. 1995;1:129–33.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rock JA, Roberts CP, Jones HW. Congenital anomalies of the uterine cervix: lessons from 30 cases managed clinically by a common protocol. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:1858–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Joki-Erkkilä MM, Heinonen PK. Presenting and long-term clinical implications and fecundity in females with obstructing vaginal malformations. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2003;16:307–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Troiano RN, McCarthy SM. Müllerian duct anomalies: imaging and clinical issues. Radiology. 2004;233:19–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Strawbrigde LC, Crough NS, Cutner AS, Creighton SM. Obstructive Mullerian anomalies and modern laparoscopic management. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2007;20:195–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gubbini G, Di Spiezio SA, Nascetti D, Marra E, Spinelli M, Greco E, Casadio P, Nappi C. New outpatient subclassification system for American Fertility Society classes V and VI uterine anomalies. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009;16:554–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    El Saman AM, Shahin AY, Nasr A, Tawfik NA, Saadeldeen HS, Othman ER, Habib DM, Abdel-Aleem MA. Hybrid septate uterus, coexistence of bicornuate and septate varieties: a genuine report. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2012;38:1308–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Grimbizis GF, Gordts G, Di Spiezio SA, Brucker S, De Angelis C, Gergolet M, Li T-C, Tanos V, Brölmann H, Gianaroli L, Campo R. The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital malformations. Hum Reprod. 2013a;28:2032–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Grimbizis GF, Gordts G, Di Spiezio SA, Brucker S, De Angelis C, Gergolet M, Li T-C, Tanos V, Brölmann H, Gianaroli L, Campo R. The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital malformations. Gynecol Surg. 2013b;10:199–212.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fink A, Kosecoff J, Chassin M, Brook RH. Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. Am J Public Health. 1984;74:979–83.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jones J, Hunter D. Consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ. 1995;311:376–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vonk Noordegraaf A, Huirne J, Brölmann H, van Mechelen W, Anema J. Multidisciplinary convalescence recommendations after gynaecological surgery: a modified Delphi method among experts. BJOG. 2011;118:1557–67.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Grimbizis GF, Tsalikis T, Mikos T, Papadopoulos N, Tarlatzis BC, Bontis JN. Successful end-to-end cervico-cervical anastomosis in a patient with congenital cervical fragmentation: case report. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:1204–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gergolet M, Campo R, Verdenik I, Kenda Suster N, Gordts S, Gianaroli L. No clinical relevance of the height of fundal indentation in subseptate or arcuate uterus: a prospective study. RBM Online. 2012;24:576–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tomazevic T, Ban-Frangez H, Ribic-Pucelj M, Premru-Srsen T, Verderik I. Small uterine septum is an important risk variable for preterm birth. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007;135:154–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fedele L, Bianchi S, Zanconato G, Berlanda N, Bergamini V. Laparoscopic removal of the cavitated noncommunicating rudimentary uterine horn: surgical aspects in 10 cases. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:432–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fedele L, Bianchi S, Zanconato G, Berlanda N, Bergamini V. Laparoscopic removal of the cavitated noncommunicating rudimentary uterine horn: surgical aspects in 10 cases. Fertil Steril. 2007;83:432–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Theodoridis TD, Saravelos H, Chatzigeorgiou KN, Zepiridis L, Grimbizis GF, Vavilis D, Loufopoulos A, Bontis JN. Laparoscopic management of unicornuate uterus with non-communicating rudimentary horn (three cases). RBM Online. 2006;12:126–8.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Aittomaki K, Eroila H, Kajanoja P. A population-based study of the incidence of Mullerian aplasia in Finland. Fertil Steril. 2001;76:624–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Oppelt PG, Lermann J, Strick R, Dittrich R, Strissel P, Rettig I, Schulze C, Renner SP, Beckmann MW, Brucker S, Katharina Rall K, Mueller A. Malformations in a cohort of 284 women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome (MRKH). Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2012;10:57–64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rall K, Barresi G, Wallwiener D, Brucker SY, Staebler A. Uterine rudiments in patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome consist of typical uterine tissue types with predominantly basalis-like endometrium. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:1392–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Di Spiezio Sardo A, Campo R, Gordts S, Spinelli M, Cosimato C, Tanos V, Brucker S, Li TC, Gergolet M, De Angelis C, Gianaroli L, Grimbizis G. The comprehensiveness of the ESHRE/ESGE classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies: a systematic review of cases not classified by the AFS system. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:1046–58.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Grimbizis GF, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Saravelos SH, Gordts S, Exacoustos C, Van Schoubroeck D, Bermejo C, Amso NN, Nargund G, Timmerman D, Athanasiadis A, Brucker S, De Angelis C, Gergolet M, Li T-C, Tanos V, Tarlatzis B, Farquharson R, Gianaroli L, Campo R. The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:2–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Grimbizis GF, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Saravelos SH, Gordts S, Exacoustos C, Van Schoubroeck D, Bermejo C, Amso NN, Nargund G, Timmerman D, Athanasiadis A, Brucker S, De Angelis C, Gergolet M, Li T-C, Tanos V, Tarlatzis B, Farquharson R, Gianaroli L, Campo R. The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies. Gynecol Surg. 2016;13:1–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyMedical School, Aristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece
  2. 2.European Academy of Gynaecological SurgeryLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations