Advertisement

How to Overcome a Resistant Cervix for Hysteroscopy

  • Alessandro Favilli
  • Mario Grasso
  • Sandro Gerli
  • Ivan Mazzon
Chapter

Abstract

Both in diagnostic and operative setting, the cervical canal is the way that surgeon has to take in order to access the uterine cavity. In the beginning, due to its anatomical characteristics, crossing the cervix represented the first problem that the pioneers of hysteroscopy had to face to reach the uterine cavity. In the last few decades hysteroscopy has developed in terms of technology and execution technique. Nevertheless, resistant cervix and pain, often related to it, still remain the most common causes of failure to complete the procedure in diagnostic and operative hysteroscopy. Several pathologies may affect the cervical canal, creating the condition for a resistant cervix. Nevertheless, behind a consistent number of resistant cervixes there is the lack of an adequate study of the cervical canal during diagnostic hysteroscopy, the poor knowledge of the pathologies that can be encountered and procedures incorrectly performed. The knowledge of characteristics and pathology of cervical canal as well as the hysteroscopic techniques conceived to solve such hindrances could help the surgeon to easily overcome a resistant cervix.

Keywords

Hysteroscopy Cervical stenosis Cervical canal Uterine cavity Resistant cervix 

References

  1. 1.
    Gonzales G. Storia dell'Isteroscopia. Milano, Italy: Passoni Editore; 2008.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gambadauro P, Magos A. Pain control in hysteroscopy. Finesse, not local anaesthesia. BMJ. 2010;c2097:340.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ahmad G, O'Flynn H, Attarbashi S, Duffy JM, Watson A. Pain relief for outpatient hysteroscopy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(11):CD007710.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bettocchi S, Bramante S, Bifulco G, Spinelli M, Ceci O, Fascilla FD, et al. Challenging the cervix: strategies to overcome the anatomic impediments to hysteroscopy: analysis of 31,052 office hysteroscopies. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(5):e16–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lin YH, Hwang JL, Huang LW, Seow KM, Chen HJ, Tzeng CR. Efficacy of hysteroscopic cervical resection for cervical stenosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013;20(6):836–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ferenczy A. Anatomy and histology of the cervix. In: Blaustein A, editor. Blaustein’s pathology of the female genital tract. New York: Springer; 1994. p. 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mazzon I, Favilli A, Horvath S, Grasso M, Di Renzo GC, Laurenti E, et al. Pain during diagnostic hysteroscopy: what is the role of the cervical canal? A pilot study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;183:169–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hamou J. Uterine adhesions. In: Hamou J, John JS, editors. Hysteroscopy and microhysteroscopy: text and atlas. New York: Appleton & Lange; 1991. p. 139–50.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mazzon I, Favilli A, Grasso M, Horvath S, Di Renzo GC, Gerli S. Is cold loop hysteroscopic myomectomy a safe and effective technique for the treatment of submucous myomas with intramural development? A series of 1434 surgical procedures. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015;22(5):792–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sharma M, Taylor A, di Spiezio Sardo A, Buck L, Mastrogamvrakis G, Kosmas I, et al. Outpatient hysteroscopy: traditional versus the ‘no-touch’ technique. BJOG. 2005;112(7):963–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grimbizis GF, Gordts S, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Brucker S, De Angelis C, Gergolet M, et al. The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(8):2032–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Larue L, Keromnes G, Massari A, Roche C, Bouret D, Cassuto NG, et al. Anatomical causes of difficult embryo transfer during in vitro fertilization. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 2017;46(1):77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mazzon I, Favilli A, Grasso M, Horvath S, Bini V, Di Renzo GC, et al. Pain in diagnostic hysteroscopy: a multivariate analysis after a randomized, controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(5):1398–403.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhu X, Xu D, Allornuvor G, Gao F, Xue M. Hysteroscopic management of congenital external cervical os stenosis using a “no-touch” technique in an adolescent. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2015;28(2):e23–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Suh-Burgmann EJ, Whall-Strojwas D, Chang Y, Hundley D, Goodman A. Risk factors for cervical stenosis after loop electrocautery excision procedure. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96(5 Pt 1):657–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Barbieri RL. Stenosis of the external cervical os: an association with endometriosis in women with chronic pelvic pain. Fertil Steril. 1998;70(3):571–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Barbieri RL, Callery M, Perez SE. Directionality of menstrual flow: cervical os diameter as a determinant of retrograde menstruation. Fertil Steril. 1992;57(4):727–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mihmanli V, Cetinkaya N, Kilickaya A, Kilinc A, Kose D. Giant cervical myoma associated with urinary incontinence and hydroureteronephrosis. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2015;42(5):690–1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stamatellos I, Stamatopoulos P, Bontis J. The role of hysteroscopy in the current management of the cervical polyps. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2007;276(4):299–303.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gubbini G, Casadio P, Marra E. Resectoscopic correction of the “isthmocele” in women with postmenstrual abnormal uterine bleeding and secondary infertility. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15(2):172–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Salari BW, Bhagavath B, Galloway ML, Findley AD, Yaklic JL, Lindheim SR. Hysteroscopic morcellator to overcome cervical stenosis. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(6):e12–e3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    De Iaco P, Marabini A, Stefanetti M, Del Vecchio C, Bovicelli L. Acceptability and pain of outpatient hysteroscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2000;7(1):71–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Favilli A, Mazzon I, Gerli S. Pain in office hysteroscopy: it is not just a matter of size. Comment on: “Paulo AA, Solheiro MH, Paulo CO. Is pain better tolerated with mini-hysteroscopy than with conventional device? A systematic review and meta-analysis: hysteroscopy scope size and pain. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 May 7”. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016;293(3):687–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mahajan N, Gupta I. Use of Versapoint to refashion the cervical canal to overcome unusually difficult embryo transfers and improve in-vitro fertilization-embryo transfer outcome: a case series. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2011;4(1):12–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jansen FW, Vredevoogd CB, van Ulzen K, Hermans J, Trimbos JB, Trimbos-Kemper TC. Complications of hysteroscopy: a prospective, multicenter study. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96(2):266–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pakrashi T. New hysteroscopic techniques for submucosal uterine fibroids. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2014;26(4):308–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bradley LD. Complications in hysteroscopy: prevention, treatment and legal risk. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2002;14(4):409–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mazzon I, Sbiroli C. Miomectomia. In: Mazzon Ivan SC, editor. Manuale di Chirurgia Resettoscopica in Ginecologia. Torino, Italy: UTET; 1997. p. 191–217.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Grimes DA. Diagnostic dilation and curettage: a reappraisal. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982;142(1):1–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Polyzos NP, Zavos A, Valachis A, Dragamestianos C, Blockeel C, Stoop D, et al. Misoprostol prior to hysteroscopy in premenopausal and post-menopausal women. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2012;18(4):393–404.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Al-Fozan H, Firwana B, Al Kadri H, Hassan S, Tulandi T. Preoperative ripening of the cervix before operative hysteroscopy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(4):CD005998.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Selk A, Kroft J. Misoprostol in operative hysteroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(4):941–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zhuo Z, Yu H, Jiang X. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of cervical ripening with misoprostol administration before hysteroscopy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016;132(3):272–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alessandro Favilli
    • 1
  • Mario Grasso
    • 2
  • Sandro Gerli
    • 3
  • Ivan Mazzon
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, Translational Medicine and Surgery Research Doctoral ProgramUniversity of PerugiaPerugiaItaly
  2. 2.“Arbor Vitae” CentreClinica Nuova Villa ClaudiaRomeItaly
  3. 3.Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, Section of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre of Reproductive MedicineUniversity of PerugiaPerugiaItaly

Personalised recommendations