Hysteroscopy pp 677-682 | Cite as

Management of Proximal Tubal Occlusion

Chapter

Abstract

Proximal tubal occlusion (PTO) accounts for approximately 10–20% of tubal infertility cases. Diagnosis of this pathology is mainly done by HSG (Hystero Salpingo Graphy) or Sonohysterography as part of infertility investigation. Most patients with this pathology are referred for In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) program while simple surgical minimal invasive methods to treat this pathology are available. Several methods have been described in the past for the treatment of this pathology, among them trans tubal catheterization, hysteroscopy-laparoscopic guided tubal catheterization and recently hysteroscopically guided transvaginal ultrasound tubal catheterization. In all methods, spontaneous pregnancy rates can reach 40%.

Since the later method described in details in this chapter is a minimal invasive office procedure that can be carried out in the gynecologist office, it should be considered in some cases as an alternative to IVF treatments in cases of PTO.

Keywords

Proximal tubal occlusion Tubal infertility Hysteroscopic tubal catheterization Transvaginal ultrasound Office procedure 

Supplementary material

Video 59.1

Hysteroscopically guided TVUS TC (MPG 31128 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Musich J, Behrman S. Surgical management of tubal obstruction at the uterotubal junction. Fertil Steril. 1983;40:423–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Novy MJ, Thurmond AS, Patton P, et al. Diagnosis of corneal obstruction by transcervical fallopian tube cannulation. Fertil Steril. 1988;50:434–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Swart P, Mol BW, van der Veen F, et al. The accuracy of 508 hysterosalpingography in the diagnosis of tubal pathology: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 1995;3:486–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Honore GM, Holden AE, Schenken RS. Pathophysiology and management of proximal tubal blockage. Fertil Steril. 1999;71:785–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Das S. Proximal tubal disease: the place for tubal cannulation. Reprod Med Online. 2007;15:383–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lo Monte G, Capobianco G, Piva I, Caserta D, et al. Hysterosalpingo contrast sonography (HyCoSy): let’s make the point! Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;291:19–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Al-Jaroudi D, Herba MJ, Tulandi T. Reproductive performance after selective tubal catheterization. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005;12:150–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Allahbadia GN, Merchant R. Fallopian tube recanalization: lessons learnt and future challenges. Womens Health. 2010;6(4):531–49.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Saunders RD, Shwayder JM, Nakajima ST. Current methods of tubal patency assessment. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:2171–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Evers JL, Land JA, Mol BW. Evidence-based medicine for diagnostic questions. Semin Reprod Med. 2003;21:9–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dessole S, Meloni GB, Capobianco G, et al. A second hysterosalpingography reduces the use of selective technique for treatment of a proximal tubal obstruction. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:1037–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mol BW, Collins JA, Burrows EA, et al. Comparison of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in predicting fertility outcome. Hum Rerod. 1999;14:1237–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sulak PJ, Letterie GS, Coddington CC, et al. Histology of proximal tubal occlusion. Fertil Steril. 1987;48:437–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Soares SR, Barbosa dos Reis MM, Camargos AF. Diagnostic accuracy of sonohysterography, transvaginal sonography, and hysterosalpingography in patients with uterine cavity diseases. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:406–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Acholonu UC, Silberzweig J, Stein DE, Keltz M. Hysterosalpingography versus sonohysterography for intrauterine abnormalities. JSLS. 2011;15:471–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Maheux-Lacronix M, Boutin A, Moore L, Bergeron ME, Bujold E, Laberge P, Lemyre M, Dodin S. Hysterosalpingosonography for diagnosing tubal occlusion in sub fertile women: a systemic review with meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:953–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Platia MP, Krudy AG. Transvaginal fluoroscopic cannulation and lavage in the treatment of a proximally occluded oviduct. Fertil Steril. 1985;44:704–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sulak PJ, Lettrie GS, Hayslip CC, et al. Hysteroscopic cannulation and lavage in the treatment of proximal tubal occlusion. Fertil Steril. 1987;48:493–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cohen SB, Bouaziz J, Setton-Jakobson A, et al. Hysteroscopically guided transvaginal ultrasound tubal catheterization—a novel office procedure. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;204:113–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Allahbadia GN, Merchant R. Fallopian tube recanalization: lessons learnt and future challenges. Womens Health (Lond). 2010;6:531–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rozewicki S, Radomska A, Kurzawa R. Relation between anatomical courses of the intramural portions of the uterine tubes and pelvic endometriosis. Feril Steril. 2005;85:60–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Falcone T, Goldberg JM. Hysteroscopic tubal cannulation. Nezhat’s Viseo-assisted and robotic-assisted laparoscopy and hysteroscpy, vol. 75. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013. p. 110–3.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Minimal Invasive Gynecological Surgeries, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, Sackler School of MedicineTel Aviv UniversityTel-AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations