Advertisement

Hysteroscopy pp 563-578 | Cite as

Complications During Hysteroscopy

  • Bruno J. van Herendael
  • Antonio Malvasi
  • Simona Zaami
  • Andrea Tinelli
Chapter

Abstract

Operative hysteroscopy is a mini invasive technique to treat uterine cavity diseases. As surgical technique, even if mini invasive, unfortunately it is not without risks and complications. By technology progresses some of the complications occur less frequently when small barrel hysteroscopes are used, both in operative outpatient procedures and when small barrel resectoscopes are used. The procedure in general has a low risk of adverse effects with an incidence of 0.28% in 13,600 procedures. Indications for endoscopic surgery become wider therefore safety protocols become more important in the prevention of complications. This is particularly important as most complications do occur during the learning curve of the surgeons mastering the technique and in specific procedures, i.e. hysteroscopic myomectomy, where the risk of complications can be as high as 10%. The recommendation is also for hysteroscopic surgery to be graded according to the difficulty. In this chapter, we will discuss on the major and minor complications of hysteroscopic surgery, illustrating by figures and images and discussing on the solutions to reduce and treat complications.

Keywords

Hysteroscopy Complications Uterine perforation Uterine bleeding Intravasation Dextran Glycine Post-TURP syndrome Infections 

References

  1. 1.
    Jansen FW, Vredevoogd CB, van Ulzen K. Complications of hysteroscopy: a prospective multicentre study. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96:266–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aydeniz B, Walwiener D, Rimbach S. Co-administration of ethanol to the distension medium in surgical hysteroscopy a screening method to prevent fluid overload? A prospective randomized comparative study of ablative versus non-ablative hysteroscopy and various ethanol concentrations. Gynäkol Geburtshilfiche Rundsch. 1995;35:108–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Propst AM, Liberman RF, Harlow BL‘. Complications of hysteroscopic surgery: predicting patients at risk. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96:517–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Karakus S, Akkar OB, Yildiz C, Yenicesu GI, Cetin M, Cetin A. Comparison of effectiveness of Laminaria versus vaginal misoprostol for cervical preparation before operative hysteroscopy in women of reproductive age: a prospective randomized. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016;23(1):46–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Song T, Kim MK, Kim ML, Jung YW, Yoon BS, Seong SJ. Effectiveness of different routes of misoprostol administration before operative hysteroscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(2):519–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Casadei l PE, Manicuti CL, Cardinale S, Collamarini M, Piccione E. Role of vaginal estradiol pre-treatment combined with vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening before operative hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2016;59(3):220–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Al-Fozan H, Firwana B, AlKadri H, Hassan S, Tulandi T. Preoperative ripening of the cervix before operative hysteroscopy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;4:CD005998.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lindemann HJ. The use of CO2 in the uterine cavity for hysteroscopy. Int J Fertil. 1972;17:221.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pellicano M, Guida M, Zullo F‘. Carbon dioxide versus normal saline as uterine distension medium for diagnostic hysteroscopy in infertile patients: a prospective randomized multicentre study. Fertil Steril. 2003;79:418–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baggish MS, Daniell JF. Death caused by air embolism with ND:YAG laser surgery and artificial sapphire tips. AM J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161:877–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brooks PG. Venous air embolism during operative hysteroscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1997;4:309–4229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Groenman FA, Peters LW, Rademaker PBM, Bakkum EA. Embolism of air and gas in hysteroscopic procedures: pathophysiology and implication for daily practice. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15:241–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Leake JF, Murphy AA, Zacur HA‘. Non-cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: a complication of operative hysteroscopy. Obstet Gynecol. 1987;48:497.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    McLucas B‘. Hyskon complications in hysteroscopic surgery. Obstet Gynecol Survey. 1991;46:196–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Witz CA, Silverberb KM, Burns WN, Schenken RS, Olive DC‘. Complications associated with the absorption of hysteroscopic fluid media. Fertil Steril. 1993;60:745–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bauman R, Magos A, Kay JDS, Turnbull AC. Absorption of glycine irrigating solution during trans-cervical resection of the endometrium. Br Med J. 1990;300:304–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    AAGL Practice Report: Prac J Minim Invasive Gynecol tice guidelines for the management of hysteroscopic distending media. 2013; 20:137–148.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Munro MG‘. Complications of hysteroscopic and uterine resectoscopic surgery. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am. 2010;37:399–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dua RS, Bankes MJ, Dowd GS. Compartment syndrome following pelvic surgery in the lithotomy position. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2002;84:170–1.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Grames DA. Diagnostic dilatation and curettage a reappraisal. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982;142:1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    DeCherney A, Diamond MP, Lavy G, Polan ML. Endometrial ablation for intractable uterine bleeding. Obstet Gynecol. 1987;70:668–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Di Spezio Sardo A, Calagna G, Di Carlo C, Guida M, Perina A, Nappi C‘. Cold loops applied to bipolar resectoscope: a safe “one-step” myomectomy for treatment od submucosal myomas with intramural development. J Obstet Gynecol Res. 2015;41(12):1935–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Noventa M, Ancona E, Quaranta M, Vitagliano A, Cosmi E, D’Antona D, Gizzo S. Intrauterine morcellator device: the icon of hysteroscopic future or merely a marketing image? A systematic review regarding safety, efficacy, advantages and contraindications. Reprod Sci. 2015;22(10):1289–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Litta P, Leggieri C, Conte L, Dalla Toffola A, Multinu F, Angioni S. Monopolar vesus bipolar device: safety, feasibility, limits and perioperative complications in performing hysteroscopic myomectomy. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2014;41:335–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Munro MG, Christianson LA. Complications of hysteroscopic and uterine resectoscopic surgery. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;58(4):765–97.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tamman AE, Ahmed HH, Abdella AH, Taha SA. Comparative study between monopolar electrodes and bipolar electrodes in hysteroscopic surgery. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(11):QC11–3.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Loffer FD. Removing intrauterine lesions: myomectomy and polypectomy. In: Bieber EJ, Loffer FD, editors. The gynecologic resectoscope. Cambridge: Cambridge Blackwell Scientific; 1994. p. 186–94.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Goldrath MU. Uterine tamponade for the control of acute uterine bleeding. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983;147:869–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cooper JM, Bradley RM. Intraoperative and early postoperative complications of operative hysteroscopy. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am. 2000;27:347–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Antibiotic prophylaxis for gynecologic procedures (ACOG practice bulletin n° 14). Washington, DC: ACOG; 2009.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Taskin O., Sadi S., Onoglu A.” Role of endometrial suppression on the frequency of intra uterine adhesion after resectoscopic surgery”. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2000; 7:351–354.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hill D, Maher P, Wood C. Complications of operative hysteroscopy. Gynaecol Endosc. 1992;1:185–9.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Cook JR, Semal IE. Pregnancy following endometrial ablation: case history and literature review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2003;58-8:551–8.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hare A.A, Olah K.S “Pregnancy following endometrial ablation: a review article. J Obstet Gynaecol 2009; 25:108–114.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Polyzos MP, Mauri D, Tsioras S. Intraperitoneal dissemination of endoemtrial cancer cells after hysteroscopy. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010;20:231–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Creasman WT, Lukerman J.” Role of the fallopian tube dissemination of malignant cells in corpus cancer.” Cancer 1972; 29:456–457.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lasters B, van Herendael BJ. Anaesthesia and monitoring in an outpatient set up in ambulatory hysteroscopy diagnosis and treatment. In: Herendael BJ, Valle R, Bettocchi S, editors. , vol. 22. Oxford: Blandon Medical Publishing; 2004. p. 152–60.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Corson SL, Brooks PG, Serden SP, Batzer FR, Godal B. Effect of vasopressin administration during hysteroscopic surgery. J Reprod Med. 1994;39:419–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bruno J. van Herendael
    • 1
    • 2
  • Antonio Malvasi
    • 3
    • 4
  • Simona Zaami
    • 5
  • Andrea Tinelli
    • 7
    • 6
  1. 1.Endoscopic SurgeryUniversità degli Studi dell’InsubriaVareseItaly
  2. 2.Endoscopic Surgery Ziekenhuis NetwerkAntwerpenBelgium
  3. 3.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Santa Maria HospitalGVM Care & ResearchBariItaly
  4. 4.Laboratory of Human Physiology, Department of Applied MathematicsMoscow Institute of Physics and Technology (State University)Dolgoprudny, Moscow RegionRussia
  5. 5.Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedic SciencesSapienza University of RomeRomeItaly
  6. 6.Laboratory of Human Physiology, Department of Applied MathematicsMoscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Moscow State UniversityDolgoprudny, MoscowRussia
  7. 7.Division of Experimental Endoscopic Surgery, Imaging, Technology and Minimally Invasive Therapy, Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyVito Fazzi HospitalLecceItaly

Personalised recommendations