Advertisement

Hysteroscopy pp 201-209 | Cite as

Hysteroscopy in Patients with Repeated Implantation Failure

  • Alka Kumar
Chapter

Abstract

Repeated implantation failure is a major clinical challenge and is the cause of considerable stress to patients and clinicians in assisted reproductive technology (ART). Hysteroscopy enables the clinician evaluate the uterine abnormalities such as endometrial polyps, submucous myomas, adhesions, septa, tubal ostia, and inflammatory endometrial pathologies like endometrial tuberculosis and chronic endometritis. Hysteroscopy also allows the diagnosis as well as the treatment of the intrauterine pathology in the same setting, thereby increasing the pregnancy rate in subfertility.

Keywords

Hysteroscopy Fertility Implantation failure Endometrium Chronic endometrium Polyps Endometrial tuberculosis Adhesion Septum Adenomyosis 

References

  1. 1.
    Bouwmans CA, Lintsen BM, Eijkemans MJ, Habbema JD, Braat DD, Hakkaart L. A detailed cost analysis of in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(2):331–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rogers PA, Milne BJ, Trounson AO. A model to show human uterine receptivity and embryo viability following ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf. 1986;3(2):93–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shamma FN, Lee G, Gutmann JN, Lavy G. The role of office hysteroscopy in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1992;58(6):1237–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    La Sala GB, Montanari R, Dessanti L, Cigarini C, Sartori F. The role of diagnostic hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy in assisted reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril. 1998;70(2):378–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Oliveira FG, Abdelmassih VG, Diamond MP, Dozortsev D, Nagy ZP, Abdelmassih R. Uterine cavity findings and hysteroscopic interventions in patients undergoing in vitro fertilizationembryo transfer who repeatedly cannot conceive. Fertil Steril. 2003;80(6):1371–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hinckley MD, Milki AA. 1000 officebased hysteroscopies prior to in vitro fertilization: feasibility and findings. JSLS. 2004;8(2):103–7.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Demirol A, Gurgan T. Effect of treatment of intrauterine pathologies with office hysteroscopy in patients with recurrent IVF failure. Reprod Biomed Online. 2004;8(5):590–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Doldi N, Persico P, Di Sebastiano F, Marsiglio E, De Santis L, Rabellotti E, Fusi F, Brigante C, Ferrari A. Pathologic findings in hysteroscopy before in vitro fertilizationembryo transfer (IVFET). Gynecol Endocrinol. 2005;21(4):235–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rama Raju GA, Shashi Kumari G, Krishna KM, Prakash GJ, Madan K. Assessment of uterine cavity by hysteroscopy in assisted reproduction programme and its influence on pregnancy outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2006;274(3):160–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bosteels J, Weyers S, Puttemans P, Panayotidis C, Van Herendael B, Gomel V, Mol BW, Mathieu C, D'Hooghe T. The effectiveness of hysteroscopy in improving pregnancy rates in subfertile women without other gynaecological symptoms: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;16(1):1–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fatemi HM, Kasius JC, Timmermans A, van Disseldorp J, Fauser BC, Devroey P, Broekmans FJ. Prevalence of unsuspected uterine cavity abnormalities diagnosed by office hysteroscopy prior to in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(8):1959–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    ElMazny A, AbouSalem N, ElSherbiny W, Saber W. Outpatient hysteroscopy: a routine investigation before assisted reproductive techniques? Fertil Steril. 2011;95(1):272–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Makrakis E, Pantos K. The outcomes of hysteroscopy in women with implantation failures after invitro fertilization: findings and effect on subsequent pregnancy rates. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2010;22(4):339–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Crosignani PG, Rubin BL. Optimal use of infertility diagnostic tests and treatments, The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Hum Reprod. 2000;15(3):723–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Smit JG, Kasius JC, Eijkemans MJ, Koks CA, Van Golde R, Oosterhuis JG, Nap AW, Scheffer GJ, Manger PA, Hoek A, Kaplan M, Schoot DB, van Heusden AM, Kuchenbecker WK, Perquin DA, Fleischer K, Kaaijk EM, Sluijmer A, Friederich J, Laven JS, van Hooff M, Louwe LA, Kwee J, Boomgaard JJ, de Koning CH, Janssen IC, Mol F, Mol BW, Torrance HL, Broekmans FJ. The inSIGHT study: costs and effects of routine hysteroscopy prior to a first IVF treatment cycle. A randomised controlled trial. BMC Womens Health. 2012;12:22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health (UK). Fertility: assessment and treatment for people with fertility problems. London, UK: RCOG Press; 2004. NICE Clinical Guidelines, No. 11. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK45935 Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gera PS, Allemand MC, Tatpati LL, Galanits TM, Morbeck D, Coddington CC. Role of saline infusion sonography in uterine evaluation before frozen embryo transfer cycle. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(3):562–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bosteels J, Kasius J, Weyers S, Broekmans FJ, Mol BW, D'Hooghe TM. Hysteroscopy for treating subfertility associated with suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(2).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bozdag G, Aksan G, Esinler I, Yarali H. What is the role of office hysteroscopy in women with failed IVF cycles? Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17(3):410–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cenksoy P, Ficicioglu C, Yıldırım G, Yesiladali M. Hysteroscopic findings in women with recurrent IVF failures and the effect of correction of hysteroscopic findings on subsequent pregnancy rates. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013;287(2):357–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Woelfer B, Salim R, Banerjee S, Elson J, Regan L, Jurkovic D. Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies detected by three-dimensional ultrasound screening. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98(6):1099–103.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Propst AM, Hill JA. Anatomic factors associated with recurrent pregnancy loss. Semin Reprod Med. 2000;18(4):341–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Creasy RK, Resnik R. Maternal-fetal medicine: principles and practice. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1994. p. 447.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Buttram VC, Gibbons WE. Mullerian anomalies: a proposed classification. (An analysis of 144 cases). Fertil Steril. 1979;32(1):40–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tripathy SN, Tripathy SN. Endometrial tuberculosis. J Indian Med Assoc. 1987;85(5):136–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schaefer G. Female genital tuberculosis. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1976;19(1):223–39.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Siegler AM, Kontppoulous V. Female genital tuberculosis and the role of hysterosalpingography. Semin Roentgenol. 1979;14:295.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kumar A, Kumar A. Endometrial tuberculosis. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2004;11(1):2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kumar A, Kumar A. Unusual appearing tubercular deposits at hysteroscopy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007;14(2):144.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kumar A, Kumar A. Intraluminal tubal adhesions. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(2):434–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kumar A, Kumar A. Hysteroscopic findings of starry sky appearance and impregnated cobwebs in endometrial tuberculosis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014;126(3):280–1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kumar A, Kumar A. Relook hysteroscopy after antitubercular therapy. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(3):701–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kumar A, Kumar A. Surface architecture in endometrial tuberculosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21(5):727–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kumar A, Kumar A. Endometrial tuberculosis in a unicornuate uterus with a rudimentary horn. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007;14(3):269.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Cicinelli E, Tinelli R, Colafiglio G, Saliani N, Pastore A. Tubercular endometritis: a rare condition reliably detectable with fluid hysteroscopy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15(6):752–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sherman ME, Mazur MT, Kurman RJ. Benign diseases of the endometrium. In: Kurman RJ, editor. Blaustein’s pathology of the female genital tract. New York: Springer; 2002. p. 180.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cravello L, et al. Identification and treatment of endometritis. Contracept Fertil Sex. 1997;25:585–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Greenwood SM, Moran JJ. Chronic endometritis: morphologic and clinical observations. Obstet Gynecol. 1981;58(2):176–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Cicinelli E, Resta L, Nicoletti R, Tartagni M, Marinaccio M, Bulletti C, Colafiglio G. Detection of chronic endometritis at fluid hysteroscopy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005;12(6):514–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hamou JE. Microhysteroscopic appearances. In: Hamou JE, Taylor PJ, editors. Hysteroscopy and microcolpohysteroscopy: a text and atlas. Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange; 1991. p. 134.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Dotto JE, et al. Classification of microhysteroscopic images and their correlation with histologic diagnoses. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2003;10:233–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kumar A, Kumar A. An unusual appearance chronic Endometritis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015;22(6):927–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kumar A, Kumar A. A successful break up. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(6):685.e1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kodman PH. Hysteroscopic polypectomy undergoing IVF treatment for women when is it necessary? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2016;28:184–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Weimar CH, Macklon NS, Post Uiterweer ED, Brosens JJ, Gellersen B. The motile and invasive capacity of human endometrial stromal cells: implications for normal and impaired reproductive function. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19(5):542–57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Grimbizis GF, Mikos T, Tarlatzis B. Uterus-sparing operative treatment for adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(2):472–87.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Seval MM, Şükür YE, Özmen B, Kan Ö, Sönmezer M, Berker B, Atabekoğlu C. Does adding endometrial scratching to diagnostic hysteroscopy improve pregnancy rates in women with recurrent in-vitro fertilization failure? Gynecol Endocrinol. 2016;32(12):957–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    ElKhayat W, Elsadek M, Saber W. Comparing the effect of office hysteroscopy with endometrial scratch versus office hysteroscopy on intrauterine insemination outcome: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015;194:96–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Lensen SF, Manders M, Nastri CO, Gibreel A, Martins WP, Templer GE, Farquhar C. Endometrial injury for pregnancy following sexual intercourse or intrauterine insemination. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;(6):CD01142.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Potdar N, Gelbaya T, Nardo LG. Endometrial injury to overcome recurrent embryo implantation failure: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012;25(6):561–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Women’s Health CentreJaipurIndia

Personalised recommendations