Advertisement

Hysteroscopy pp 141-148 | Cite as

Hysteroscopy or Curettage?

  • T. Justin Clark
Chapter

Abstract

Endometrial curettage has long been used to obtain tissue for histological examination in women after the menopause in order to make a diagnosis and exclude pre-malignant and malignant disease. In recent times, office-based, miniature endometrial biopsy devices have largely replaced formal curettage because they are more convenient and are considered to have comparable levels of accuracy. In contrast to blind endometrial sampling, hysteroscopy allows visualisation within the uterine cavity and can facilitate the taking of directed biopsies. Technological advances in endoscopic equipment have shifted hysteroscopy from an inpatient endeavour in anaesthetised women to a convenient, safe and highly feasible office setting. Thus, the threshold for undertaking hysteroscopy has been reduced such that hysteroscopy could potentially replace the need for blind endometrial sampling. Although hysteroscopy is more successful than blind endometrial biopsy, its accuracy, especially in diagnosing endometrial hyperplasia and cancer, has conventionally been considered to be equivalent. Recent data however, challenge this prevailing view. Focal pathologies such as polyps, myomas and endometrial hyperplasia/cancer can be missed without direct visualisation provided by hysteroscopy. Thus, the ability of blind sampling to exclude serious endometrial disease appears to be much lower than previously appreciated. Thus, further testing utilising hysteroscopy for focal intra-cavity pathology in women with a failed, insufficient or benign result of endometrial sampling seems warranted. The role of office hysteroscopy in the diagnostic workup of women presenting with postmenopausal bleeding needs to be re-evaluated. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness studies should take account of these new data, and practice guidelines should be updated accordingly.

Keywords

Hysteroscopy Endometrial curettage Dilatation and curettage Endometrial biopsy Endometrial hyperplasia Endometrial cancer Endometrial polyp Myoma Fibroid Accuracy Cost-effectiveness 

References

  1. 1.
    Clark TJ, Gupta JK. Handbook of outpatient hysteroscopy: a complete guide to diagnosis and therapy. London: Hodder Arnold; 2005. ISBN: 978-0-340-81651-6.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    van Dongen H, de Kroon CD, Jacobi CE, Trimbos JB, Jansen FW. Diagnostic hysteroscopy in abnormal uterine bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2007;114:664–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cooper NA, Clark TJ, Middleton L, Diwakar L, Smith P, Denny E, Roberts T, Stobert L, Jowett S, Daniels J, OPT Trial Collaborative Group. Outpatient versus inpatient uterine polyp treatment for abnormal uterine bleeding: randomised controlled non-inferiority study. BMJ. 2015;350:h1398. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1398.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dijkhuizen FP, Mol BW, Brolmann HA, Heintz AP. The accuracy of endometrial sampling in the diagnosis of patients with endometrial carcinoma and hyperplasia: a meta-analysis. Cancer. 2000;89:1765–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clark TJ, Mann CH, Shah N, Khan KS, Song F, Gupta JK. Accuracy of outpatient endometrial biopsy in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer: a systematic quantitative review. BJOG. 2002;109(3):313–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Clark TJ, Mann CH, Shah N, Khan KS, Song F, Gupta JK. Accuracy of outpatient endometrial biopsy in the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80(9):784–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grimes DA. Diagnostic dilation and curettage: a reappraisal. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982;142:1–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bachmann LM, ter Riet G, Clark TJ, Gupta JK, Khan KS. Probability analysis for diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia and cancer in postmenopausal bleeding: an approach for a rational diagnostic workup. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;82:564–9.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/ j.1600-0412.2003.00176.x.
  9. 9.
    Gredmark T, Kvint S, Havel G, Mattson LA. Histopathological findings in women with postmenopausal bleeding. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995;102:133–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Creasman W, Odicino F, Maisonneuve P, Quinn M, Beller U, Benedet J, et al. Carcinoma of the corpus uteri. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2006;95(Suppl. 1):S105–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016S0020-7292(06)60031-3.
  11. 11.
    Peeters J, Opmeer BC, Clark TJ, Verheijen RH, Timmermans A, Mol BWJ. The capacity of endometrial thickness measurement to diagnose endometrial carcinoma in asymptomatic postmenopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;40:621–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Clark TJ, Cooper NAM, Kremer C. Best practice in outpatient hysteroscopy. Best practice in outpatient hysteroscopy: green top guideline 59. RCOG/ BSGE Joint Green Top Guideline. RCOG 2011. http://www.rcog.org.uk/files/rcog-corp/GTG59Hysteroscopy.pdf.
  13. 13.
    Clark TJ. Accuracy of hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer and hyperplasia: a systematic quantitative review. J Am Med Assoc. 2002;288(13):1610–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Haller H, Matejcic N, Rukavina B, Krasevic M, Rupcic S, Mozetic D. Transvaginal sonography and hysteroscopy in women with postmenopausal bleeding. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1996;54:155–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gulumser C, Narvekar N, Pathak M, Palmer E, Parker S, Saridogan E. See-and-treat outpatient hysteroscopy: an analysis of 1109 examinations. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;20:423–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.11.024.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Clark TJ, Godwin J, Khan KS, Gupta JK. Ambulatory endoscopic treatment of symptomatic benign endometrial polyps. A feasibility study. Gynaecol Endosc. 2002;11:91–7. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1046/j.1365-2508.2002.00485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bettocchi S, Nappi L, Ceci O, Selvaggi L. What does ‘diagnostic hysteroscopy’ mean today? The role of the new techniques. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2003;15:303–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.gco.0000084241.09900.c8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Critchley HOD, Warner P, Lee AJ, Brechin S, Guise J, Graham B. Evaluation of abnormal uterine bleeding: comparison of three outpatient procedures within cohorts defined by age and menopausal status. Health Technol Assess. 2004;8(34).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hanegem v, Prins MM, Bongers MY, Opmeer BC, Sahota DS, Mol BW, Timmermans A. The accuracy of endometrial sampling in women with postmenopausal bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;197:147–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gimpelson RJ. Panoramic hysteroscopy with directed biopsies vs. dilatation and curettage for accurate diagnosis. J Reprod Med. 1984;29(8):575–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Angioni S, Loddo A, Milano F, Piras B, Minerba L, Melis GB. Detection of benign intracavitary lesions in postmenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding: a prospective comparative study on outpatient hysteroscopy and blind biopsy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15:87–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2007.10.014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Turnbull HL, Akrivos N, Simpson P, Duncan TJ, Nieto JJ, Burbos N. Investigating vaginal bleeding in postmenopausal women found to have an endometrial thickness of equal to or greater than 10 mm on ultrasonography. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;295:445–50. doi: 10.1007/s00404-016-4249-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    van Hanegem N, Breijer MC, Slockers SA, Zafarmand MH, Geomini P, Catshoek R, Pijnenborg J, van der Voet LF, Dijkhuizen F, van Hoecke G, Reesink-Peters N, Veersema S, van Hooff M, van Kesteren P, Huirne JA, Opmeer BC, Bongers MY, Mol B, Timmermans A. Diagnostic workup for postmenopausal bleeding: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2017;124:231–40. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14126.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Investigation of post-menopausal bleeding. Royal College of Physicians: Edinburgh; 2002.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Clark TJ, Barton PM, Coomarasamy A, Gupta JK, Khan KS. Investigating post-menopausal bleeding for endometrial cancer: cost-effectiveness of initial diagnostic strategies. BJOG. 2006;113:502–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bourdel N, Chauvet P, Tognazza E, Pereira B, Botchorishvili R, Canis M. Sampling in atypical endometrial hyperplasia: which method results in the lowest underestimation of endometrial cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016;23:692–701. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.03.017.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Clark TJ, Neelakantan D, Gupta JK. The management of endometrial hyperplasia: an evaluation of current practice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006;125:259–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Farquhar C, Ekeroma A, Furness S, Arroll B. A systematic review of transvaginal ultrasonography, sonohysterography and hysteroscopy for the investigation of abnormal uterine bleeding in premenopausal women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;(6):493–504.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cooper NAM, Barton PM, Breijer MC, Caffrey O, Opmeer BC, Timmermans A, Mol BWJ, Khan KS, Clark TJ. NIHR HTA Project: 09/63/01—cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies for the management of abnormal uterine bleeding (heavy menstrual bleeding and post-menopausal bleeding): model based economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2014;18:1–201. http://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/116782/FullReport-hta18240.pdf.
  30. 30.
    Medverd JR, Dubinsky TJ. Cost analysis model: US versus endometrial biopsy in evaluation of peri- and postmenopausal abnormal vaginal bleeding. Radiology. 2002;222:619–27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dijkhuizen FP, Mol BW, Brolmann HA, Heintz AP. Cost-effectiveness of the use of transvaginal sonography in the evaluation of postmenopausal bleeding. Maturitas. 2003;45:275–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5122(03)00152-X.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Anderson KE, Anderson E, Mink PJ, Hong CP, Kushi LH, Sellers TA, et al. Diabetes and endometrial cancer in the Iowa women’s health study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2001;10:611–16.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gull B, Karlsson B, Milsom I, Granberg S. Factors associated with endometrial thickness and uterine size in a random sample of postmenopausal women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:386–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mob.2001.115869.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    McPherson CP, Sellers TA, Potter JD, Bostick RM, Folsom AR. Reproductive factors and risk of endometrial cancer. The Iowa Women’s Health Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1996;143:1195–202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008707 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Weiderpass E, Persson I, Adami HO, Magnusson C, Lindgren A, Baron JA. Body size in different periods of life, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and risk of postmenopausal endometrial cancer (Sweden). Cancer Causes Control. 2000;11:185–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Cooper NAM, Smith P, Khan KS, Clark TJ. Vaginoscopic approach to outpatient hysteroscopy: a systematic review of the effect on pain. BJOG. 2010;117:532–9. Review. Erratum in: BJOG. 2010;117:1440.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cicinelli E, Comi N, Scorcia P, Petruzzi D, Epifani S. Hysteroscopy for diagnosis and treatment of endometrial adenocarcinoma precursors: a review of literature. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 1993;14:425–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ben Yehuda OM, Kim YB, Leuchter RS. Does hysteroscopy improve upon the sensitivity of dilatation and curettage in the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia or carcinoma? Gynecol Oncol. 1998;68:4–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Epstein E, Ramirez A, Skoog L, Valentin L. Dilatation and curettage fails to detect most focal lesions in the uterine cavity in women with postmenopausal bleeding. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80:1131–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Gebauer G, Hafner A, Siebzehnrubl E, Lang N. Role of hysteroscopy in detection and extraction of endometrial polyps: results of a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184:59–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Madari S, Al-Shabibi N, Papalampros P, Papadimitriou A, Magos A. A randomised trial comparing the H Pipelle with the standard Pipelle for endometrial sampling at ‘no-touch’ (vaginoscopic) hysteroscopy. BJOG. 2009;116:32–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01992.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Birmingham Women’s NHS Foundation Trust and University of BirminghamBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations