Advertisement

Hysteroscopy pp 113-121 | Cite as

Postmenstrual Bleeding

  • Tirso Pérez-Medina
  • Laura Calles
  • Mar Ríos
Chapter

Abstract

Persistence of trophoblastic or placental tissue after abortion or delivery is a common issue that induces some problems such as abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB), infection of the residual tissue, or secondary infertility as well as complications derived from repeated D&C as uterine perforation or the development of uterine adhesions or Asherman syndrome.

References

  1. 1.
    Goldenberg M, Schiff E, Achiron R, Lipitz S, Mashiach S. Managing residual trophoblastic tissue hysteroscopy for directing curettage. J Reprod Med. 1997;42:26–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ben-Ami I, Schneider D, Maymon R, Vaknin Z, Herman A, Halperin R. Sonographic versus clinical evaluation as predictors of residual trophoblastic tissue. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:1107–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Achiron R, Goldenberg M, Lipitz S, Mashiach S. Transvaginal duplex Doppler ultrasonography in bleeding patients suspected of having residual trophoblastic tissue. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;81:507–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jiménez JS, Gonzalez C, Alvarez C, Muñoz L, Pérez C, Muñoz JL. Conservative management of retained trophoblastic tissue and placental polyp with diagnostic ambulatory hysteroscopy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;145:89–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cohen SB, Kalter-Ferber A, Weisz BS, et al. Hysteroscopy may be the method of choice for management of residual trophoblastic tissue. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2001;8:199–202.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pérez-Medina T, Sancho-Saúco J, Ríos M, Pereira A, Argila N, Cabezas E, Cayuela E. Hysteroscopy in pregnancy-related conditions: descriptive analysis in 273 patients. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21(3):417–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vakiani M, Vavilis D, Agorastos T, Stamatopoulos P, Assimaki A, Bontis J. Histopathological findings of the endometrium in patients with dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 1996;23(4):236–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fraser IS, Hickey M, Song JY. A comparison of mechanisms underlying disturbances of bleeding caused by spontaneous dysfunctional uterine bleeding or hormonal contraception. Hum Reprod. 1996;11(Suppl 2):165–78.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Livingstone M, Fraser IS. Mechanisms of abnormal uterine bleeding. Hum Reprod Update. 2002;8(1):60–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stewart CJ, Bharat C, Leake R. Asynchronous glands in secretory pattern endometrium: clinical associations and immunohistological changes. Histopathology. 2015;67(1):39–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vervoort AJ, Van der Voet LF, Witmer M, Thurkow AL, Radder CM, van Kesteren PJ, Quartero HW, Kuchenbecker WK, Bongers MY, Geomini PM, de Vleeschouwer LH, van Hooff MH, van Vliet HA, Veersema S, Renes WB, van Meurs HS, Bosmans J, Oude Rengerink K, Brölmann HA, Mol BW, Huirne JA. The HysNiche trial: hysteroscopic resection of uterine caesarean scar defect (niche) in patients with abnormal bleeding, a randomised controlled trial. BMC Womens Health. 2015;15:103.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tower AM, Frishman GN. Cesarean scar defects: an underrecognized cause of abnormal uterine bleeding and other gynecologic complications. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013;20(5):562–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ofili-Yebovi D, Ben-Nagi J, Sawyer E, et al. Deficient lower-segment cesarean section scars: prevalence and risk factors. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31:72–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Armstrong V, Hansen WF, Van Voorhis BJ, Syrop CH. Detection of cesarean scars by transvaginal ultrasound. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101:61–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Osser OV, Jokubkiene L, Valentin L. High prevalence of defects in cesarean section scars at transvaginal ultrasound examination. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34:90–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nieuwenhuis LL, de Vaate MA, Hehenkamp WJ, Heymans MW, van Baal MW, Brölmann HA, Huirne JA. Diagnostic and clinical value of 3D gel installation sonohysterography in addition to 2D gel installation sonohysterography in the assessment of intrauterine abnormalities. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;175:67–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fabres C, Aviles G, De La Jara C, et al. The cesarean delivery scar pouch: clinical implications and diagnostic correlation between transvaginal sonography and hysteroscopy. J Ultrasound Med. 2003;22:695–700.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    van der Voet LF, Vervoort AJ, Veersema S, BijdeVaate AJ, Brölmann HA, Huirne JA. Minimally invasive therapy for gynaecological symptoms related to a niche in the caesarean scar: a systematic review. BJOG. 2014;121(2):145–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gubbini G, Centini G, Nascetti D, et al. Surgical hysteroscopic treatment of cesarean-induced isthmocele in restoring fertility: prospective study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011;18:234–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Raimondo G, Grifone G, Raimondo D, Seracchioli R, Scambia G, Masciullo V. Hysteroscopic treatment of symptomatic cesarean-induced isthmocele: a prospective study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015;22(2):297–301.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shih CL, Chang YY, Ho M, et al. Hysteroscopic transcervical resection: a straightforward method corrects bleeding related to cesarean section scar defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204:278.e1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Feng Y, Li M, Liang X, Li X. Hysteroscopic treatment of postcesarean scar defect. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012;19:498–502.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nirgianakis K, Oehler R, Mueller M. The Rendez-vous technique for treatment of caesarean scar defects: a novel combined endoscopic approach. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(2):770–1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Marotta ML, Donnez J, Squifflet J, Jadoul P, Darii N, Donnez O. Laparoscopic repair of post-cesarean section uterine scar defects diagnosed in non-pregnant women. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013;20:386–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Luo L, Niu G, Wang Q, Xie HZ, Yao SZ. Vaginal repair of cesarean section scar diverticula. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012;19(4):454–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sorinola O, Kamal NG, Condie RG, Wats JF. Subfertility due to osseous metaplasia of the endometrium treated by hysteroscopic resection. Curr Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;10:42–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Adamson NE, Sommers SC. Endometrial ossification: report of two cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1954;67:187–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cicinelli E, Stanziano A, Parisi C, Narinaccio M, Causio F. Hysteroscopic diagnosis and treatment of endocervical ossification: a case report. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005;12:159–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cayuela E, Pérez-Medina T, Vilanova J, Alejo M, Cañadas P. Osseous metaplasia: the bone is not from a fetus. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(1293):e1–4.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Clark TJ, Stevenson H. Endometrial polyps and abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB-P): what is the relationship, how are they diagnosed and how are they treated? Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016; pii: S1521-6934(16)30082-7.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Perez-Medina T, Martínez O, Folgueira G, Bajo JM. Which endometrial polyps should be resected? J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1999;6:71–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Salim S, Won H, Nesbitt-Hawes E, Campbell N, Abbott J. Diagnosis and management of endometrial polyps: a critical review of the literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011;18(5):569–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Perez-Medina T, Bajo J, Huertas MA, Rubio A. Predicting atypia inside endometrial polyps. J Ultrasound Med. 2002;21:125–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kanthi JM, Remadevi C, Sumathy S, Sharma D, Sreedhar S, Jose A. Clinical study of endometrial polyp and role of diagnostic hysteroscopy and blind avulsion of polyp. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(6):QC01–4.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Di Spiezio Sardo A, Calagna G, Guida M, Perino A, Nappi C. Hysteroscopy and treatment of uterine polyps. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;29(7):908–19.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yang JH, Chen CD, Chen SU, Yang YS, Chen MJ. Factors influencing the recurrence potential of benign endometrial polyps after hysteroscopic polypectomy. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0144857.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Clark TJ, Middleton LJ, Cooper NA, Diwakar L, Denny E, Smith P, Gennard L, Stobert L, Roberts TE, Cheed V, Bingham T, Jowett S, Brettell E, Connor M, Jones SE, Daniels JP. A randomised controlled trial of Outpatient versus inpatient Polyp Treatment (OPT) for abnormal uterine bleeding. Health Technol Assess. 2015;19(61):1–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    AAGL Practice Report. AAGL practice report: practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of submucous leiomyomas. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012;19:152–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Emanuel MH, Verdel MJC, Stas H, et al. An audit of true prevalence of intrauterine pathology: the hysteroscopical findings controlled the patient selection in 1202 patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. Gynaecol Endosc. 1995;4:237–41.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lasmar RB, Barrozo PR, Dias R, Oliveira MA. Submucous myomas: a new presurgical classification to evaluate the viability of hysteroscopic surgical treatment—preliminary report. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005;12:308–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    van Dongen H, de Kroon CD, Jacobi CE, Trimbos JB, Jansen FW. Diagnostic hysteroscopy in abnormal uterine bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2007;114:664–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Dueholm M, Lundorf E, Sorensen JS, Ledertoug S, Olesen F, Laursen H. Reproducibility of evaluation of the uterus by transvaginal sonography, hysterosonographic examination, hysteroscopy and magnetic resonance imaging. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:195–200.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hart R, Molnar BG, Magos A. Long-term follow-up of hysteroscopic myomectomy assessed by survival analysis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;106:700–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Loffer FD. Improving results of hysteroscopic submucosal myomectomy for menorrhagia by concomitant endometrial ablation. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005;12:254–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Vercellini P, Zaina B, Yaylayan L, Pisacreta A, De Giorgi O, Crosignani PG. Hysteroscopic myomectomy: long-term effects on menstrual pattern and fertility. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94:341–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Vercellini P, Oldani S, DeGiorgi O, Cortesi II, Moschetta M, Crosignani PG. Endometrial ablation with a vaporizing electrode in women with regular uterine cavity or submucous leiomyomas. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1996;3:S52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Emanuel MH, Wamsteker K. The Intra Uterine Morcellator: a new hysteroscopic operating technique to remove intrauterine polyps and myomas. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005;12:62–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tirso Pérez-Medina
    • 1
    • 2
  • Laura Calles
    • 2
  • Mar Ríos
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyAutónoma University of MadridMadridSpain
  2. 2.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyPuerta de Hierro University HospitalMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations