Abstract
Metal thieves are influenced by three kinds of social controls: direct social control, indirect social control, and internal social control. Direct controls are the external risks associated with stealing metal (e.g., dogs, cameras, witnesses, and law enforcement). Indirect social controls influence behavior within relationships. For example, a positive influence is a condemning family member and a negative influence is a metal theft partnership. Internal controls are the beliefs of right and wrong held by the thief. Internal control is often overcome with neutralization techniques: temporally suspending norms, justifying behavior, or appealing to a higher authority. Increasing guardianship, dogs and cameras, observant witnesses, and police presence influence the activity of metal thieves but rarely entirely dissuade them from the theft.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Nye, F. I. (1958). Family relationships and delinquent behavior. New York: Wiley.
Sykes, G. M., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 664–670.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stickle, B.F. (2017). Social Controls of Metal Thieves. In: Metal Scrappers and Thieves. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57502-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57502-5_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57501-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57502-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)