Management of Pancreatic Injury in the Geriatric Patient

  • Charles E. Lucas
  • Anna M. Ledgerwood


Surgeons always like to perform their magic on young adults who are in training in some athletic event for the upcoming Olympics. Unfortunately, our society continues to age so that more and more operations are performed in the elderly. The challenges of surgery in the geriatric population relate to the adverse events that aging has on both physical well-being and mental acumen. The extent of physical derangement is often referred to by the popular term “frailty” whereas the progressive mental deterioration often falls under the name of “Alzheimer’s disease.” Although aging, per se, is not the cause of fragility or reduced acumen, the trend is for both to become progressively worse each year. Clearly, the effect of fragility and decreased cognitive function impair successful surgical treatment. This is true not only for elective surgery but especially for emergency operations after injury.

Consequently, the treatment of pancreatic injury may differ in the frail elderly patient. Patients with grade I injury (small laceration) and grade II injury (larger laceration without major ductal injury) will more likely be treated by percutaneous drainage to avoid the insult of a major laparotomy. Patients with grade III injury (deep distal laceration with ductal injury) will more likely be treated with percutaneous drainage, deferring definitive treatment of a subsequent pseudocyst until the patient is more stable. Grade IV lacerations to the pancreatic head will likely be treated with exploration and wide extensive drainage without major organ resection. Patients with grade V injury (severe combined pancreatic head laceration with duodenal rupture) will more likely be treated with primary repair of the duodenal injury and wide extensive drainage of the associated pancreatic injury. Definitive treatment of complications of this ultra-conservative approach will be carried out when the patient is more stable.


  1. 1.
    Augustin T, Chalikonda S, Wey J, Burstein M, Merrig-Stiff G, Walsh N. Frailty predicts risk of life threatening complications and mortality after pancreatic resections. Surg 2016;160(4):987–996.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Callcut RA, Wakam G, Conroy AS, Kornbligh L, Howard BM, Campion EM, Nelson MF, Mell MW, Cohen MJ. Discovering the truth about life after discharge: long-term trauma-related mortality. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;80:210–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Maxwell CA, Mion LC, Mukherjee K, Dietrich MS, Minnick A, Addison M, Miller RS. Preinjury physical frailty and cognitive impairment among geriatric trauma patients determine postinjury functional recovery and survival. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;80:195–203.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cook AC, Bellal J, Kenji I, Nakonezny PA, Bruns BR, Kerby JD, Brasel KJ, Wolf SE, Cuschieri J, Paulk ME, Rhodes RL, Brakenridge SC, Phelan HA. Multicenter external validation of the Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score: A study by the Prognostic Assessment of Life and Limitations after Trauma in the Elderly (PALLIATE) consortium. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;80:204–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lucas CE. Injury severity scoring after gunshot wounds treated at an inner-city trauma center. (Submitted).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lucas CE, Ledgerwood AM. Injuries to the stomach, duodenum, pancreas, small bowel, colon and rectum. In: Wilmore C, Harken H, Soper M, editors. ACS Surgery Principles and Practice 2003. New York, NY: webMD Inc; 2003. p. 420–31.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lucas CE. Diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic and duodenal injury. Surg Clin North Am. 1977;57(1):49–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mayer JM, Tomczak R, Rau B, Gebhard F, Beger HG. Pancreatic injury in severe trauma: early diagnosis and therapy improves the outcome. Dig Surg. 2002;19:291–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Takishina T, Sugimoto K, Hirata M, Asari Y, Ohwada T, Kakita A. Serum amylase level on admission in the diagnosis of blunt injury to the pancreas: its significance and limitations. Ann Surg. 1997;226:70–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lucas CE. Abdominal organ injury: diagnosis, treatment, and education. Second annual WR Ghent lecture on trauma. Can J Surg. 1990;33(3):189–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cirillo RL, Koniaris LG. Detecting blunt pancreatic injuries. J Gastrointest Surg. 2002;6:587–98.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hayward SR, Lucas CE, Sugawa C, Ledgerwood AM. Emergency endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. (Brief clinical note). Arch Surg. 1989;124(6):745–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wind P, Tiret E, Cunningham C, Frileux P, Cugnenc PH, Parc R. Contribution of endoscopic retrograde pancreatography in management of complications following distal pancreatic trauma. Am Surg. 1999;65:777–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bokhari F, Phelan H, Holevar M, Brautigam R, Collier B, Como JJ, Clancy K, Cumming JK, Cullinane D, Smith L. Diagnosis and management of pancreatic trauma. East Practice Management Guidelines. 2009.
  15. 15.
    Lucas CE, Ledgerwood AM. The academic challenge of teaching psychomotor skills for hemostasis of solid organ injury. J Trauma. 2009;66(3):636–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tom WW, Howells GA, Bree RL, Schwab R, Lucas RJ. A nonoperative approach to the adult ruptured spleen sustained from blunt trauma. Am Surg. 1985;51:367–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Meguid AA, Bair HA, Howell GA, Bendick PJ, Kerr HH, Villalba MR. Prospective evaluation of criteria for the nonoperative management of blunt splenic trauma. Am Surg. 2003;69(3):238–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hamidian-Jahromi AH, D’Agostino HR, Zibari GB, Chu QD, Clark C, Shokouh-Amiri H. Surgical versus nonsurgical management of traumatic major pancreatic duct transection: institutional experience and review of the literature. Pancreas. 2013;42:76–87.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Leppanimi AK, Haapiainen RK. Pancreatic trauma with proximal duct injury. Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1954;83:191–5.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Amirata E, Livingston DH, Elcavage J. Octreotide acetate decreases pancreatic complications after pancreatic trauma. Am J Surg. 1994;168(4):345–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nwariaku FE, Terricina A, Myleski WJ, Minei JP, Carrico CJI. Octreotide beneficial following pancreatic injury? Am J Surg. 1995;170:582–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lucas CE, Ledgerwood AM. Ongoing unpublished personal data.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fabian TC, Kudsk KA, Croce MA, Payne LW, Mangiante EC, Voeller GR, Britt LG. Superiority of closed suction drainage for pancreatic trauma: a randomized, prospective study. Ann Surg. 1990;211:724–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Asensio JA, Petrone P, Roldan G, Kuncir E, Demetriades D. Pancreatiocoduodenectomy: a rare procedure for the management of complex pancreaticoduodenal injuries. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;197:937–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schroeppel TJ, Saleem K, Sharpe JP, Magnotti LJ, Weinberg JA, Riter E, Croce MA, Fabian TC. Penetrating duodenal trauma: a 19 year experience. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;80(3):461–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Patcher JL, Hofstetter SR, Liang HG, Hoballah J. Traumatic injuries to the pancreas: the role of distal pancreatectomy with splenic preservation. J Trauma. 1989;29:1352–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Patton JH Jr, Lyden SP, Croce MA, Pritchard FE, Minard G, Kudsk KA, Fabian TC. Pancreatic trauma: a simplified management guideline. J Trauma. 1997;43:234–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Michael and Marian Ilitch Department of SurgeryWayne State University School of MedicineDetroitUSA
  2. 2.Wayne State University School of MedicineDetroitUSA

Personalised recommendations