Abstract
Rare diseases, either of genetic or epigenetic origin, either proliferative or degenerative, are hard to be studied credibly, because of sparse prevalence, thus, small sampling. In addition, biological or translational experimentation either with animal models, or in vitro studies share small sampling-often due to lack of financial support or due to mannered and costly techniques. Pilot or feasibility studies been performed, before expensive clinical trials are decided, focus on small samples. Small Samples Evaluator (SSEv) is a useful tool based on a modification of survival curves. The technique can be applied to repeated measures, as well as to case-control or cross-sectional designed studies. A web-based application of SSEv is created and presented herein. The application is freely accessible at: https://ssev.eu.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Button, K.S., J.P. Ioannidis, C. Mokrysz, B.A. Nosek, J. Flint, E.S. Robinson, and M.R. Munafo. 2013. Power Failure: Why Small Sample Size Undermines the Reliability of Neuroscience. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience 14 (5): 365–376. doi:10.1038/nrn3475.
Paraskevopoulou, M.D., I.S. Vlachos, E. Athanasiadis, and G. Spyrou. 2013. BiDaS: A Web-Based Monte Carlo BioData Simulator Based on Sequence/Feature Characteristics. Nucleic Acids Research 41 (Web Server Issue): W582–W586. doi:10.1093/nar/gkt420.
Durlak, J.A. 2009. How to Select, Calculate, and Interpret Effect Sizes. Journal of Pediatric Psychology 16: 1–12.
Hedges, L.V., and I. Olkin. 1985. Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. New York: Academic Press.
Lipsey, M.W., and D.B. Wilson. 2001. Practical Meta-Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
de Winter, J.C.F. 2013. Using the Student’s t-Test with Extremely Small Sample Sizes. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation 18 (10) ISSN-1531-7714.
Mu, Q., and R.J. Fehring. 2014. Efficacy of Achieving Pregnancy with Fertility-Focused Intercourse. MCN: American Journal of Maternal Child Nursing 39 (1): 35–40. doi:10.1097/NMC.0b013e3182a76b88.
Espinosa Bosch, M., R. Asensi Diez, S. Garcia Agudo, and A. Clopes Estela. 2016. Nintedanib in Combination with Docetaxel for Second-Line Treatment of Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer; GENESIS-SEFH Drug Evaluation Report. Farmacia Hospitalaria 40 (4): 316–327. doi:10.7399/fh.2016.40.4.10455.
Karim, M.E., J. Petkau, P. Gustafson, R.W. Platt, and H. Tremlett. 2016. Comparison of Statistical Approaches Dealing with Time-Dependent Confounding in Drug Effectiveness Studies. Statistical Methods in Medical Research. doi:10.1177/0962280216668554.
Geronikolou, S., S. Zimeras, C.H. Davos, I. Michalopoulos, and S. Tsitomeneas. 2014. Diverse Radiofrequency Sensitivity and Radiofrequency Effects of Mobile or Cordless Phone Near Fields Exposure in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS One 9 (11): e112139. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0112139.
Bacchetti, P., S.G. Deeks, and J.M. McCune. 2011. Breaking Free of Sample Size Dogma to Perform Innovative Translational Research. Science Translational Medicine 3 (87): 87ps24. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3001628.
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. I Michalopoulos for helping us constructing the website.
Conflict of Interest
We see no conflict of interest. This work and server construction had no financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Geronikolou, S., Zimeras, S. (2017). SSEv: A New Small Samples Evaluator Based on Modified Survival Curves. In: Vlamos, P. (eds) GeNeDis 2016 . Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 989. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57348-9_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57348-9_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57347-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57348-9
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)