Skip to main content

SSEv: A New Small Samples Evaluator Based on Modified Survival Curves

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover GeNeDis 2016

Part of the book series: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology ((AEMB,volume 989))

  • 1380 Accesses

Abstract

Rare diseases, either of genetic or epigenetic origin, either proliferative or degenerative, are hard to be studied credibly, because of sparse prevalence, thus, small sampling. In addition, biological or translational experimentation either with animal models, or in vitro studies share small sampling-often due to lack of financial support or due to mannered and costly techniques. Pilot or feasibility studies been performed, before expensive clinical trials are decided, focus on small samples. Small Samples Evaluator (SSEv) is a useful tool based on a modification of survival curves. The technique can be applied to repeated measures, as well as to case-control or cross-sectional designed studies. A web-based application of SSEv is created and presented herein. The application is freely accessible at: https://ssev.eu.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Button, K.S., J.P. Ioannidis, C. Mokrysz, B.A. Nosek, J. Flint, E.S. Robinson, and M.R. Munafo. 2013. Power Failure: Why Small Sample Size Undermines the Reliability of Neuroscience. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience 14 (5): 365–376. doi:10.1038/nrn3475.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Paraskevopoulou, M.D., I.S. Vlachos, E. Athanasiadis, and G. Spyrou. 2013. BiDaS: A Web-Based Monte Carlo BioData Simulator Based on Sequence/Feature Characteristics. Nucleic Acids Research 41 (Web Server Issue): W582–W586. doi:10.1093/nar/gkt420.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Durlak, J.A. 2009. How to Select, Calculate, and Interpret Effect Sizes. Journal of Pediatric Psychology 16: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hedges, L.V., and I. Olkin. 1985. Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lipsey, M.W., and D.B. Wilson. 2001. Practical Meta-Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  6. de Winter, J.C.F. 2013. Using the Student’s t-Test with Extremely Small Sample Sizes. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation 18 (10) ISSN-1531-7714.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mu, Q., and R.J. Fehring. 2014. Efficacy of Achieving Pregnancy with Fertility-Focused Intercourse. MCN: American Journal of Maternal Child Nursing 39 (1): 35–40. doi:10.1097/NMC.0b013e3182a76b88.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Espinosa Bosch, M., R. Asensi Diez, S. Garcia Agudo, and A. Clopes Estela. 2016. Nintedanib in Combination with Docetaxel for Second-Line Treatment of Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer; GENESIS-SEFH Drug Evaluation Report. Farmacia Hospitalaria 40 (4): 316–327. doi:10.7399/fh.2016.40.4.10455.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Karim, M.E., J. Petkau, P. Gustafson, R.W. Platt, and H. Tremlett. 2016. Comparison of Statistical Approaches Dealing with Time-Dependent Confounding in Drug Effectiveness Studies. Statistical Methods in Medical Research. doi:10.1177/0962280216668554.

  10. Geronikolou, S., S. Zimeras, C.H. Davos, I. Michalopoulos, and S. Tsitomeneas. 2014. Diverse Radiofrequency Sensitivity and Radiofrequency Effects of Mobile or Cordless Phone Near Fields Exposure in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS One 9 (11): e112139. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0112139.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Bacchetti, P., S.G. Deeks, and J.M. McCune. 2011. Breaking Free of Sample Size Dogma to Perform Innovative Translational Research. Science Translational Medicine 3 (87): 87ps24. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3001628.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. I Michalopoulos for helping us constructing the website.

Conflict of Interest

We see no conflict of interest. This work and server construction had no financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Styliani Geronikolou or Stelios Zimeras .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Geronikolou, S., Zimeras, S. (2017). SSEv: A New Small Samples Evaluator Based on Modified Survival Curves. In: Vlamos, P. (eds) GeNeDis 2016 . Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 989. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57348-9_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics