Mobile Applications Improve Quality of Life on Citizens with Disorientation: The ‘NeverLost App’ Paradigm

  • Sotirios Fotiou
  • Panayiotis Vlamos
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 989)


Mobile technology has been evolved as an important tool in healthcare. Mobile applications are being designed in order to assist patients in their everyday life and also to play a vital role on the improvement of their everyday activities and quality of life. Meanwhile students use advanced techniques in order to design and implement high quality applications that aim to introduce them to the advantages of the mobile technology. In this paper we present the steps for the creation of the application NeverLost that was inspired, designed, created and tested by students of the Secondary Education. NeverLost is an Android application that helps individuals (mainly children) with disabilities, as well as older patients with lack of orientation manage their day-to-day activities. A research of the general benefits that students using this app is presented, as well as their future proposals for the evolution of the app in other aspects of healthcare and quality of life of senior citizens or patients with neurodegenerative diseases.


Collaborative learning Mobile application Team-based learning Group work Assistive technology Mobility Disorientation Assistive systems Alarm systems Assisted living 


  1. 1.
    SmsGlobal. 2016. Smartphone Ownership, Usage and Penetration by Country. Accessed 2 Sep 2016
  2. 2.
    Powell, L.M., and H. Wimmer. 2016. Evaluating Students’ Perception of Group Work for Mobile Application Development Learning, Productivity, Enjoyment and Confidence in Quality. Information Systems Education Journal 14 (3): 85–95.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Al-Emran, M., H.M. Elsherif, and K. Shaalan. 2016. Investigating Attitudes Towards the Use of Mobile Learning in Higher Education. Computers in Human Behavior 56 (2016): 93–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Florian, L., and J. Hegarty. 2004. ICT and Special Educational Needs: A Tool for Inclusion. New York: McGraw-Hill International.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Williams, P., H.R. Jamali, and D. Nicholas. 2006. Using ICT with People with Special Education Needs: What the Literature Tell Us. ASLIB Proceedings 58: 330–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lombardi, M.M. 2007. Authentic Learning for the 21st Century: An Overview. Educause Learning Initiative.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Psomos, P., and M. Kordaki. 2013. Analysis of Educational Digital Storytelling Environments: The Use of the “Dimension Star” Model. In Information Systems, E-learning, and Knowledge Management Research, Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 278, 317–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beckman, M. 1990. Collaborative Learning: Preparation for the Workplace and Democracy. College Teaching 38 (4): 128–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chickering, A.W., and Z.F. Gamson, eds. 1991. Applying the Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goodsell, A., M. Maher, V. Tinto, et al. 1992. Collaborative Learning: A Sourcebook for Higher Education. University Park: National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning, and Assessment, Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cohen, S. 2006. Targeting Autism: What We Know, Don’t Know, and Can Do to Help Young Children with Autism and Other Related Disorders. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gresham, F.M., and D.L. MacMillan. 1998. Early Intervention Project: Can Its Claims be Substantiated and Its Effects Replicated? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 28 (1): 5–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schopler, E., A. Short, and G. Mesibov. 1989. Relation of Behavioral Treatment to “Normal Functioning”. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 57 (1): 162–164.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Westwood, P. 2006. Teaching and Learning Difficulties: Cross-curricular Perspectives [online]. Camberwell, VIC: ACER Press, ix, 164 p. ISBN: 9780864314932.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sharples, M., J. Taylor, and G. Vavoula. 2005. Towards A Theory of Mobile Learning. Proceedings of mLearn 1 (1): 1–10.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wan, J., C. Byrne, G.M.P. O’Hare, and M.J. O’Grady. 2011. Orange Alerts: Lessons from an Outdoor Case Study. 2011 5th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth) and Workshops, Dublin, 446–451.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hossain, S., K. Hallenborg, and Y. Demazeau. 2011. iRoute: Cognitive Support for Independent Living Using BDI Agent Deliberation. In Trends in Practical Applications of Agents and Multiagent Systems, 41–50. Berlin, Germany: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hoey, J., X. Yang, E. Quintana, and J. Favela. 2012. LaCasa: Location and Context-Aware Safety Assistant. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (Pervasive Health) and Workshops 2012, San Diego, CA, 171–174.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lin, Q., D. Zhang, X. Huang, H. Ni, and X. Zhou. 2012. Detecting Wandering Behavior Based on GPS Traces for Elders with Dementia. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Control Automation Robotics & Vision (ICARCV), Guangzhou, 2012, 672–677.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Robinson, L., K. Brittain, S. Lindsay, D. Jackson, and P. Olivier. 2009. Keeping in Touch Everyday (KITE) Project: Developing Assistive Technologies with People with Dementia and Their Carers to Promote Independence. International Psychogeriatrics 21 (3): 494–502.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sposaro, F., J. Danielson, and G. Tyson. 2010. iWander: An Android Application for Dementia Patients. Proceedings of the 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, Buenos Aires, 3875–3878.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Koldrack, P., R. Henkel, F. Krüger, S. Teipel, and T. Kirste. 2015. Supporting Situation Awareness of Dementia Patients in Outdoor Environments. Proceedings of the 2015 9th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth), Istanbul, 245–248.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Koldrack, P., R. Henkel, F. Kruger, S. Teipel, and T. Kirste. 2015. Supporting Situation Awareness of Dementia Patients in Outdoor Environments, PervasiveHealth 2015, May 20–23, Istanbul, Turkey.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yamagata, C., J.F. Coppola, M. Kowtko, and S. Joyce. 2013. Mobile App Development and Usability Research to Help Dementia and Alzheimer Patients. Paper Presented at the 9th Annual Conference on Long Island Systems, Applications and Technology, LISAT 2013.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ho, L., P.A. Bloom, J.G. Vega, S. Yemul, W. Zhao, L. Ward, and G.M. Pasinetti. 2016. Biomarkers of Resilience in Stress Reduction for Caregivers of Alzheimer’s Patients. Neuro Molecular Medicine 18 (2): 177–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pokress, S.C., and J.J.D. Veiga. 2013. MIT App Inventor: Enabling Personal Mobile Computing. PRoMoTo 2013 Proceedings.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of InformaticsIonian UniversityCorfuGreece
  2. 2.Department of Informatics, Bioinformatics and Human Electrophysiology LaboratoryIonian UniversityCorfuGreece

Personalised recommendations