Advertisement

Application of Design for Environment Principles Combined with LCA Methodology on Automotive Product Process Development: The Case Study of a Crossmember

  • S. Maltese
  • M. Delogu
  • L. Zanchi
  • A. Bonoli
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 68)

Abstract

The existing Community regulation pushes the carmakers to design eco-sustainability of the vehicle over its life cycle to limit the consequences of the current state and the expected growth of the sector. In this sense, one of the primary aim is reducing raw materials consumption and emissions through the adoption of innovative materials and technologies. This implies the need for the carmakers to integrate Design for Environment (DfE) principles at the early Research and Development (R&D) stage. The article presents a concreate example of integration of DfE and LCA methodology application in the R&D process of a vehicle component produced by Magneti Marelli. The study allowed drawing a balance between the advantages of a lightweight solution with respect to the standard one both from performance and environmental point of view.

Keywords

Automotive sector Sustainable manufacturing Design for environment Lightweighting Life cycle assessment 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank Magneti Marelli S.P.A. for the cooperation. In particular, the authors are very grateful to Mrs. Rubina Riccomagno for her fruitful contribution.

References

  1. 1.
    IEA (International Energy Agency): Key world energy statistics 2016 – total final consumption by fuel (2016). www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/KeyWorld2016.pdf
  2. 2.
    EPA (Environmental Protection Agency): Global greenhouse gas emissions data - global emissions by economic sector (2014). www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/sources-greenhouse-gas-emissions
  3. 3.
    Eurostat: Environmental data centre on waste, key waste streams, end of life vehicles (ELVs) (2015). http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/waste/key-waste-streams/elvs
  4. 4.
    Berzi, L., Delogu, M., Pierini, M., Romoli, F.: Evaluation of the end-of-life performance of a hybrid scooter with the application of recyclability and recoverability assessment methods. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 108, 140–155 (2016). doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.01.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Delogu, M., Del Pero, F., Berzi, L., Pierini, M., Bonaffini, D.: End-of-life in the railway sector: analysis of recyclability and recoverability for different vehicle case studies. Waste Management (2016, in Press). doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.09.034
  6. 6.
    Mayyas, A., Qattawi, A., Omar, M., Shan, D.: Design for sustainability in automotive industry: a comprehensive review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16, 1845–1862 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Arena, M., Azzone, G., Conte, A.: A streamlined LCA framework to support early decision making in vehicle development. J. Cleaner Prod. 41, 105–113 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bevilacqua, M., Ciarapica, F.E., Giacchetta, G.: Development of a sustainable product lifecycle in manufacturing firms: a case study. Int. J. Prod. Res. 45(18–19), 4073–4098 (2007)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Le Duigou, A., Baley, C.: Coupled micromechanical analysis and life cycle assessment as an integrated tool for natural fibre composites development. J. Cleaner Prod. 88, 61–69 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Corona, A., Madsen, B., Hauschil, M.Z., Birkved, M.: Natural fibre selection for composit eco-design. CIRP Ann. Manufact. Technol. 65, 13–16 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zanchi, L., Delogu, M., Ierides, M., Vasiliadis, H.: Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing as supporting tools for EVs lightweight design. Smart Innov. Syst. Technol. 52, 335–348 (2016). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-32098-4_29. Cited 3 timesCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Delogu, M., Del Pero, F., Romoli, F., Pierini, M.: Life cycle assessment of a plastic air intake manifold. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 20(10), 1429–1443 (2015). doi: 10.1007/s11367-015-0946-z. Cited 6 timesCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Del Pero, F., Delogu, M., Pierini, M., Bonaffini, D.: Life Cycle Assessment of a heavy metro train. J. Clean. Prod. 87(1), 787–799 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Raugei, M., Morrey, D., Hutchinson, A., Winfield, P.: A coherent life cycle assessment of a range of lightweighting strategies for compact vehicles. J. Clean. Prod. (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.100 Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kim, H.C., Wallington, T.J.: Life cycle assessment of vehicle lightweighting: a physics-based model of mass-induced fuel consumption. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 14358–14366 (2013). doi: 10.1021/es402954w CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kelly, J.C., Sullivan, J.L., Burnham, A., Elgowainy, A.: Impacts of vehicle weight reduction via material substitution on life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 12535–12542 (2015). doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b03192 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Baumann, H., Boons, F., Bragd, A.: Mapping the green product development field: engineering, policy and business perspectives. J. Cleaner Prod. 10, 409–425 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Millet, D., Bistagnino, L., Lanzavecchia, C., Camous, R., Poldma, T.: Does the potential of the use of LCA match the design team needs? J. Cleaner Prod. 15, 335–346 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Klocke, F., Kampker, A., Döbbeler, B., Maue, A., Schmieder, M.: Simplified life cycle assessment of a hybrid car body part. Procedia CIRP 15, 484–489 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Delogu, M., Zanchi, L., Maltese, S., Bonoli, A., Pierini, M.: Environmental and economic life cycle assessment of a lightweight solution for an automotive component: a comparison between talc-filled and hollow glass microspheres-reinforced polymer composites. J. Cleaner Prod. 139, 548–560 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Brown, K., Juras, P.: The 1997 Chevrolet Corvette suspension CMs. SAE Technical Papers, February (1997). www.worldstainless.org/process_and_production/production-process. Accessed May 2012
  22. 22.
    Randon, V., Lee, N.: Design of a lightweight aluminium cast crossmember. Paper presented at SAE 2002 World Congress and Exhibition, 4 March 2002Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Koffler, C.: On the calculation of fuel savings through lightweight design in automotive life cycle assessments. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 15(1), 128–135 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Berzi, L., Delogu, M., Giorgetti, A., Pierini, M.: On-field investigation and process modelling of end-of-life vehicles treatment in the context of Italian craft-type authorized treatment facilities. Waste Manag. 33(4), 892–906 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Center for sustainable systems: Update material production modules in the GREET 2 model. University of Michigan (2011). css.snre.umich.edu/project/update-material-production-modules-greet-2–model

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil, Chemical, Environmental and Materials EngineeringUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly
  2. 2.Magneti Marelli S.P.A. – Powertrain DivisionBolognaItaly
  3. 3.Department of Industrial EngineeringUniversity of FlorenceFlorenceItaly

Personalised recommendations