Advertisement

WQI, DRASTIC and Contaminant Transport Modelling Using WiscLEACH 2.0

  • Prasenjit GhoshEmail author
  • Sudha Goel
Chapter

Abstract

In the present chapter, impacts of flyash generation on local river water, ground water and river sediments are discussed. Rupnarayan river water and groundwater samples were collected from the study area and analysed for trace elements and different ions. The concentrations of different elements and ions (both in river and groundwater) were then compared with their recommended acceptable limits prescribed by WHO, IS 10500-2012 and IS 2296-1982 to assess their suitability for drinking and domestic uses respectively. Water Quality Index (WQI) and DRASTIC were applied for qualitative analyses of river water and ground water, respectively. Soil samples were collected from the surrounding areas of the ash ponds in Kolaghat and one soil sample was collected from the campus of IIT Kharagpur as the background or uncontaminated soil sample. Mineralogical compositions and trace metals concentrations in the soil and sediment samples were determined and compared with that of background soil to assess the level of land and river bed contamination. Pond ash and fly ash are used as filling materials in local roads. Since pond ash contains heavy and toxic metals, it is likely that these metals will leach from pond ash when in contact with rain water. Contaminant transport modelling of two metals, Ba and Cr from pond ash stabilized base layers of roads into the soil vadose zone and groundwater zone was done using WiscLEACH 2.0 software. The maximum concentrations of these metals and their corresponding locations in the two zones after 1, 10 and 50 years of their first leaching were predicted using this model.

References

  1. ASTM D3987–12, Standard Practice for Shake Extraction of Solid Waste with Water.Google Scholar
  2. Aydilek, D.A. and Cetin, D.B., 2013. Geoenvironmental impacts of using high carbon fly ash in structural fill applications, Research report. Maryland Dept. of Transportation, 1–265, downloaded from http:\crwww.roads.maryland.gov/OPR_Research/MD-13-SP909B4P-Geoenvironmental-Impacts-Of-Using-HCFA-In-Structural-Fill-Applications.pdf.
  3. Canter, L.W., 1996. Environmental Impact Assessment (Second Edn.). McGraw-Hill International Editions.Google Scholar
  4. Cetin, B., Aydilek, A.H. and Li, L., 2012. Experimental and numerical analysis of metal leaching from fly ash-amended highway bases. Waste Management, 32(5), 965–978.Google Scholar
  5. Chowdhury, A., Jha, M.K., Chowdary, V.M. and Mal, B.C., 2009. Integrated remote sensing and GIS based approach for assessing groundwater potential in West Medinipur district, West Bengal, India. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 30(1), 231–250.Google Scholar
  6. IS 10500: 2012. Indian Standard Drinking Water – Specification (Second Revision).Google Scholar
  7. Leij, F.J., Priesack, E. and Schaap, M.G., 2000. Solute transport modeled with Green’s functions with application to persistent solute sources. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 41(1–2), 155–173.Google Scholar
  8. Lumsdon, D., Meeussen, J.C., Paterson, E., Garden, L. and Anderson, P., 2001. Use of solid phase characterisation and chemical modelling for assessing the behaviour of arsenic in contaminated soils. Applied Geochemistry, 16(6), 571–581.Google Scholar
  9. Pang, L., Close, M., Schneider, D. and Stanton, G., 2002. Effect of pore-water velocity on chemical nonequilibrium transport of Cd, Zn, and Pb in alluvial gravel columns. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 57(3–4), 241–258.Google Scholar
  10. Perfect, E., Sukop, M.C. and Haszler, G.R., 2002. Prediction of Dispersivity for Undisturbed Soil Columns from Water Retention Parameters. Soil Science Society American Journal, 66, 696–701.Google Scholar
  11. Shahid, S., 2000. A Study of Groundwater Pollution Vulnerability Using DRASTIC/GIS, West Bengal, India. Journal of Environmental Hydrology, 8, 1–9.Google Scholar
  12. Woumeni, R.S. and Vauclin, M., 2006. A field study of the coupled effects of aquifer stratification, fluid density, and groundwater fluctuations on dispersivity assessments. Advances in Water Resources, 29(7), 1037–1055.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Capital Publishing Company, New Delhi, India 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Environmental Science and EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology BombayMumbaiIndia
  2. 2.Civil Engineering DepartmentIndian Institute of Technology KharagpurKharagpurIndia

Personalised recommendations