Skip to main content

Solidarity in the EU: A Critique of Solidarity and of the EU

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Solidarity in the European Union

Abstract

In this chapter, Bengt Beutler sheds light on solidarity as a variable concept that is embedded in the context of a changing integration project. He starts from the diagnosis that solidarity in the European Union (EU) currently seems to be a lost cause—notwithstanding multiple references to it in the Lisbon Treaties. However, by tracing the unique character of solidarity as well as that of the EU, one can find amazing similarities and mutual interdependence, Beutler argues. Solidarity marks the universal groundwork for, as well as the objective of, the survival of humanity, and the EU—for the first time in history—provides the institutional framework necessary for such solidarity, going beyond the traditional notion of a sovereign state and its exclusive mandate to uphold the common good. To make solidarity real in an increasingly fragmented world, Beutler claims, it is necessary to move away from its present abstraction and instead appeal to the intuition of the people when operating within the institutional framework provided by the EU, achieving this through concrete actions—as envisaged explicitly in the 1951 Treaty constituting the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baecker, D. (2014). Beobachter unter sich – Eine Kulturtheorie [Observers amongst themselves – A theory of culture]. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, E. (1952/2012). Avicenna und die aristotelische Linke, Berlin; Avicenna and the Aristotelian Left [translated into Arabic by M. Turki]. Tunis: The Tunisian Academy of Sciences Letters and Art, Beit al-Hikma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chargaff, E. (1994). Armes Amerika – Arme Welt. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1859). The origin of species. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Montaigne, M. (1603). Essais, S. Milange, Bordeaux (1580). The essays (by John Florio), E. Blount, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domurath, I. (2012). The three dimensions of solidarity in the EU legal order: Limits of the judicial and legal approach. Journal of European Integration, 35(4), 459–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1893/1997). De la division du travail social: Étude sur l’organisation des sociétés supérieures. Paris: Félix Alcan; The division of labour in society, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, M. (2012). Reinventing social solidarity across Europe. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, E. O. (2014). Die Normativität der Europäischen Union. Freiburg: Karl Aber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes, S., & Rubio, E. (2012). Solidarity within the Eurozone: How much, what for, for how long? Notre Europe. Accessed May, 2012, from http://www.notreeurope.eu/uploads/tx_publication/SolidarityEMU_S.Fernandes-E.Rubio_NE_Feb2012.pdf

  • Frankopan, P. (2015). The silk roads – A new history of the world. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frühbauer, J. (2007). Solidarität in Islam, Buddhismus und Konfuzianismus. Bausteine für eine interreligiöse Sozialethik, Jahrbuch für christliche Sozialwissenschaften (pp. 105–120). Münster: Institut für chirstliche Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geier, M. (2012). Aufklärung. Das europäische Projekt (Enlightenment. The European project). Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenblatt, S. (2011). The swerve – How the world became modern. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guérot, U. (2016). Warum Europa eine Republik werden muss. Bonn: J.H.W. Dietz Nachf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (2013, March). Democracy, solidarity and the European crisis, lecture held at the University of Leuven. https://www.kuleuven.be/euroforum/docs/pdf/click.php?id=14

  • Hawkins, M. (2004). Why begin with Aristotle? Durkheim on solidarity and social morphology. Durkheimian Studies/Études Durkheimiennes, (New Series), 10(2), 21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilpold, P. (2015). Understanding solidarity within EU law: An analysis of the ‘islands of solidarity’ with particular regard to Monetary Union. Yearbook of European Law 2015, 34(1), 257–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (1651). Leviathan. London: Adrew Crooke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G. M. (2006). What are institutions? Journal of Economic Issues, XL(1), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, J. H. (Ed.). (1887). Great hymns of the church compiled by the late right reverend John Freeman Young. New York: James Pott & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joas, H. (2013). The sacredness of the person, a new genealogy of human rights. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leggewie, C. (2016). Anti-Europäer, − Breivik, Dugin, al-Suri & Co [Anti-Europeans – Breivik, Dugin, al-Suri & Co]. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mak, G. (2012). Wat als Europa klapt. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Atlas; Was, wenn Europa scheitert (by G. Seferens). München: Panteon Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moretti, F. (2013). Distant reading. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niżnik, N. (2012). The concept of solidarity in the European integration discourse. In M. Ellison (Ed.), Reinventing social solidarity across Europe. Bristol: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2012). The new religious intolerance. Overcoming the politics of fear in an anxious age. Harvard: Belknap Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Picketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Harvard: Belknap Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (1945). The open society and its enemies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raspotnik, A., Jacobs, M., & Ventura, L. (2012, August 8). The issue of solidarity in the European Union. TEPSA BRIEF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1984). Solidarity or objectivity? In J. Rajchman & C. West (Eds.), Post-analytic philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salinger, J. D. (1955/1963). Raise high the roof beams, carpenters. New York; first published in The New Yorker, 19 November 1955, p. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sangiovanni, A. (2012). Solidarity in the European Union: Problems and prospects. In J. Dickson & P. Eleftheriadis (Eds.), The philosophical foundations of European Union law (pp. 384–411). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sangiovanni, A. (2013). Solidarity in the European Union. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 33(2), 213–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumann, R. (1950). EUROPA – The Schuman Declaration – 9 May 1950, third paragraph, first sentence. https://europa.eu/european-union/about-eu/

  • Settis, S. (2014/2016). Se Venezia muore. Turin: Einaudi, 2014. If Venice dies. New York: New Vessel Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. London: Methuen.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stehr, N. (2007). Moral markets: How knowledge and affluence change consumers and products. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stjerno, S. (2009). Solidarity in Europe: The history of an idea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trifunovic, M. (2013). The principle of solidarity: A restatement of John Rawls’ law of peoples, Dissertation. Humboldt-University Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bengt Beutler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Beutler, B. (2017). Solidarity in the EU: A Critique of Solidarity and of the EU. In: Grimmel, A., Giang, S. (eds) Solidarity in the European Union. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57036-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics