Considering Bureaucracy and Democracy in a Contemporary Islamic Governed State

Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Series in Islamic Theology, Law, and History book series (ITLH)

Abstract

This chapter looks at the other primary elements of an Islamic state such as bureaucracy and democratic participation. The argument offered suggests that many elements of non-Islamic thought within these areas are compatible with the same discourse on these topics that can be found within the primary Islamic sources. The focus of this chapter is on creating an Islamic governed state that is functional and just. This chapter engages in a robust discussion about contemporary public administration practices and the lack thereof in many Muslim countries today. At the core of a just state are just formal and informal institutions. Robert Dahl’s model of polyarchy is discussed in detail as an ideal goal for an Islamic governed state in that it offers a robust definition of democracy that is not necessarily inextricable from liberalism.

References

  1. Al Arabiya English. 2015. Lebanon’s ‘you stink’ protests return to Beirut, Sept 21 http://english.alarabiya.net/en/News/middle-east/2015/09/21/Lebanese-protesters-face-off-with-security-forces-in-Beirut.html. Accessed 22 Feb 2016.
  2. al-Hibri, Azizah. 1992. Islamic constitutionalism and the concept of democracy. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 24 (1): 1–27.Google Scholar
  3. Acemoǧlu, D., S. Johnson, and J.A. Robinson. 2005. Institutions as the fundamental cause of long-run growth. In Handbook of economic growth, ed. P. Aghion, and S. Darlauf, 385–472. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  4. Ahmad, E. 2006. The selected writings of Eqbal Ahmad. C. Bengelsdorf, M. Cerullo & Y. Chandri (eds.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Allawi, Ali A. 2009. The crisis of Islamic civilization. New Haven, CT: Yale UniversityPress.Google Scholar
  6. Almond, Gabriel, and Sidney Verba. 1963. The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Aristotle. 2001. The basic works of Aristotle. ed. J. Mckeon. New York: The Modern Library.Google Scholar
  8. Barber, Benjamin. 1984. Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bellin, Eva. 2004. The robustness of authoritarianism in the Middle East: Exceptionalism in comparative perspective. Comparative Politics 36 (2): 139–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berman, Sheri. 2003. Islamism, revolution, and civil society. Perspectives on Politics 1 (2): 257–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bollen, Kenneth A. 1990. Political democracy: Conceptual and measurement traps. Studies in Comparative International Development 25: 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chang, Ha-Joon. 2011. Institutions and economic development: Theory, policy and history. Journal of Institutional Economics 7 (4): 473–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Common, Richard. 2008. Administrative change in the gulf: Modernization in Bahrain and Oman. International Review of Administrative Sciences 74: 177–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Corrales, Javier, and Frank Westhoff. 2006. Information technology adoption and political regimes. International Studies Quarterly 50 (4): 911–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dahl, Robert. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Dahl, Robert. 1989. Democracy and its critics. New Haven, CT: Yale Press.Google Scholar
  17. Downs, Anthony. 1965. A theory of bureaucracy. The American Economic Review 55 (1): 439–446.Google Scholar
  18. Dunleavy, Patrick, and Christopher Hood. 1994. From old public administration to new public management. Public Money & Management 14 (3): 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dunleavy, Patrick, and Helen Margetts. 2013. The second wave of digital-era governance: Aquasi-paradigm for government on the Web. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 371 (1987): 1–17.Google Scholar
  20. Dunleavy, Patrick, Helen Margetts, Simon Bastow, and Jane Tinker. 2006. Digital era governance: IT corporations, the state and e-government. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Patrick, Dunleavy, Helen Margetts, Simon Bastow, and Jane Tinker. 2005. New public management is dead. Long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16 (3): 467–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Esposito, John. 1987. Islam and politics, 2nd ed. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Feldman, Noah. 2008. The fall and rise of the Islamic stat e. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Press.Google Scholar
  24. Fink, Carsten, and Charles Kenny. 2006. W(h)ither the digital divide? Info 5 (6): 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ghannouchi, Rachid. 2007. The participation of Islamists in a non-Islamic government. In Islam in transition: Muslim perspectives, eds. J. Donohue, and J. Esposito, 271–278. New York: Oxford Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hai, Jeong Chung, and Nor Fadzlina Nawi. 2007. Principles of public administration: An introduction. Kuala Lumpur: Karisma Publications.Google Scholar
  27. Hanifizadeh, Mohammed Reza, Abbas Saghaei, and Payam Hanifizadeh. 2009. An index for cross-country analysis of ICT infrastructure and access. Telecommunications Policy 33 (7): 385–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hourani, Albert. 1991. A history of the Arab peoples. New York: Warner Books.Google Scholar
  29. Howard, Philip N., and Nimah Mazaheri. 2009. Telecommunications reform, internet use, and mobile phone adaptation in the developing world. World Development 37 (7): 1159–1169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ibn Khaldun. 2005. The muqaddimah: An introduction to history. ed. N.J. Dawood. Franz Rosenthal (trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Izetbegović, Alija. 1990. The Islamic declaration: A programme for the Islamization of Muslims and Muslim peoples. Sarajevo.Google Scholar
  32. Jefferson, Thomas. 1843. Thomas Jefferson, letter to Benjamin Waterhouse, June 26, 1822. In The Christian reformer; or, Unitarian magazine and review,(Vol 10), ed. Robert Aspland. London: UK.Google Scholar
  33. Jefferson, Thomas. 1823. Thomas Jefferson to John Adams, April 11, 1823, The Thomas Jefferson papers series 1. General correspondence. 1651–1827. http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.mss/mtj.mtjbib024623. Accessed 25 Aug 2015.
  34. Jreisat, Jamil E. 1999. Administrative reform and the Arab world economic growth. Policy Studies Review 16 (2): 19–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kaboolian, Linda. 1998. The new public management. Public Administration Review 58 (3): 189–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kaminski, Joseph J. 2013. Bureaucracy and modernity: A comparative qualitative analysis of bureaucratic development in the US and OIC states. Politics, Bureaucracy, and Justice 3 (2): 1–10.Google Scholar
  37. Kapucu, Naim, and Hami Palabıyık. 2008. Public administration: From tradition to the modern age. Ankara, Turkey: International Strategic Research Organization.Google Scholar
  38. Khaled, Abou El Fadl. 2004. Islam and the challenge of democracy. In Islam and the challenge of democracy, ed. K. Abou El Fadl, J. Cohen, and D. Chasman, 3–48. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Khan, M.A. Muqtedar. 2006b. “The politics, theory, and philosophy of Islamic democracy”. In Islamic Democratic Discourse, ed. M.A. Muqtedar Khan, pp. 149–171. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  40. Khomeini, Ayatollah Ruhollah. 1970. Islamic government: Governance of the jurist. Hamid Algar (ed.). Tehran, Iran: Institute for the Publication of Imam Khomeini’s Works.Google Scholar
  41. Liebesny, Herbert. 1975. The law of the near and Middle East readings, cases, and materials. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  42. Maududi, Abul Ala. 1960. Islamic law and constitution.ed. Khurshid Ahmad. Lahore, Pakistan: Islamic Publications.Google Scholar
  43. Midlarsky, Manus. 1998. Democracy and Islam: Implications for civilizational conflict and the democratic Peace. International Studies Quarterly 42 (3): 485–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Milner, H. 2006. The digital divide: The role of political institutions in technology diffusion. Comparative Political Studies 39 (2): 176–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Moe, Terry. 1984. The new economics of organization. American Journal of Political Science 28 (4): 739–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Montazeri, Ayatollah Hussein-Ali. 2000. Democracy and constitution, 1–41. Ayatollah Montazeri Official Website. http://www.amontazeri.com/farsi/fl.asp. Accessed 1 May 2015.
  47. Mueller, Hannes. 2009. Patronage or meritocracy: Political institutions and bureaucratic efficiency. Spanish National Research Council. Unpublished.Google Scholar
  48. Nasr, Sayeed Hossein. 2010. Islam in the modern world. New York: Harper One.Google Scholar
  49. Niskanen, William. 1975. Bureaucrats and politicians. Journal of Law and Economics 18: 617–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. North, Douglass. 2005. Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Öberg, Magnus and Erik Melander. 2010. On the effect of quality of governance as compared to, e.g., democracy, on civil war Ooutbreak. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington DC, Aug 31–Sep 3.Google Scholar
  52. Paldam, Martin. 2009. The macro perspective on generalized trust. In Handbook of social capital: The troika of sociology, political science and economics, ed. G. Svendsen, and G. Svendsen, 354–375. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  53. Paldam, Martin, and Erich Gundlach. 2008. Two views on institutions and development: The grand transition vs the primacy of institutions. Kyklos 61 (1): 65–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pryor, Fredric. 2007. Are Muslim countries less democratic? Middle East Quarterly XIV: 53–58.Google Scholar
  55. Puddington, Arch. 2011. Freedom in the World 2011: The authoritarian challenge to democracy. Published by Freedom House. http://www.freedomhouse.org/images/File/fiw/FIW_2011_Booklet.pdf. Accessed 8 July 2014.
  56. Putnam, Robert. 2001. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  57. Qur’ān. 2001. The meaning of the glorious Qur’an. Mohammed Pickthall (trans.). New York: Alavi Foundation.Google Scholar
  58. Rauch, James, and Peter Evans. 2000. Bureaucratic structure and bureaucratic performance in less developed countries. Journal of Public Economics 75: 49–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rothstein, Bo. 2011. The quality of government: Corruption, social trust, and inequality in international perspective. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schnose, Viktoryia. 2015. Who is in charge here? Legislators, bureaucrats, and the policy making process. Party Politics 1–22. doi:10.177/1354068815597896.Google Scholar
  61. Schumpeter, Joseph. 1942. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  62. Sisk, Timothy. 1994. Islam and democracy: Religion, politics, and power in the Middle East. Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace.Google Scholar
  63. Stepan, Alfred, and Graeme Robertson. 2004. Arab, not Muslim exceptionalism. Journal of Democracy 15 (4): 140–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Svolik, Milan. 2009. Power sharing and leadership dynamics in authoritarian regimes. American Journal of Political Science 53: 477–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tocqueville, Alexis. 2003. Democracy in America. Isaac Kramnick (trans.). New York: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
  66. Veenendaal, Wouter. 2015. Politics and democracy in microstates. New York: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
  67. Wallsten, S. 2005. Regulation and internet use in developing countries. Economic Development and Cultural Change 53: 501–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Weber, Max. 1964. The theory of social and economic organization. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International University of SarajevoSarajevoBosnia and Herzegovina

Personalised recommendations