Abstract
Mobile health applications are proliferating. Platform vendors have recently created programming toolkits to support developers. In many healthcare scenarios, mobile health applications are only the end-point of a larger supervised service involving many stakeholders. We want to know how these toolkits support the delivery of such services. Using a case study approach, we study three cases of such platforms and toolkits, i.e. Apple HealthKit, Google Fit and Samsung Digital Health. We collected and analyzed data from blogs, online developer forums, toolkit documentations, and from our own programming of an example health application. We use the boundary resource model to analyze our data. Our findings show that each of the toolkits imposes, through its boundary resources, the business model of its vendor on service providers. This can have important strategic implications for health service providers who want to base their services on each of the three toolkits.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Tran, J., Tran, R., White, J.R.: Smartphone-based glucose monitors and applications in the management of diabetes. Clin. Diabetes 30, 173–178 (2012)
Farshchian, B.A., Dahl, Y.: The role of ICT in addressing the challenges of age-related falls: a research agenda based on a systematic mapping of the literature. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 19, 649–666 (2015)
von Hippel, E., Katz, R.: Shifting innovation to users via toolkits. Manag. Sci. 48, 821–833 (2002)
Gay, V., Leijdekkers, P.: Bringing health and fitness data together for connected health care: Mobile apps as enablers of interoperability. J. Med. Internet Res. 17, e260 (2015)
Gavalas, D., Economou, D.: Development platforms for mobile applications- status and trends. IEEE Softw. 28, 77–86 (2011)
Anvaari, M., Jansen, S.: Evaluating architectural openness in mobile software platforms. In: 4th European Conference on Software Architecture, pp. 85–92 (2010)
Ghazawneh, A., Henfridsson, O.: Balancing platform control and external contribution in third-party development: the boundary resources model. Inf. Syst. J. 23, 173–192 (2013)
Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks (2014)
Astrup, P., Jansen, E.G., Aksic, N.: Empirical evaluation of commercial health toolkits. Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway (2015)
Acknowledgement
We thank Petter Astrup, Erik G Jansen, and Nemanja Aksic for the collection of data used in our analysis. This paper is partly supported by the Norwegian Research Council project ADAPT (Grant Agreement No. 317631) and the EU Horizon 2020 project MyCyFAPP (Grant Agreement No. 643806).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Farshchian, B.A., Vilarinho, T. (2017). Which Mobile Health Toolkit Should a Service Provider Choose? A Comparative Evaluation of Apple HealthKit, Google Fit, and Samsung Digital Health Platform. In: Braun, A., Wichert, R., Maña, A. (eds) Ambient Intelligence. AmI 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10217. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56997-0_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56997-0_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56996-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56997-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)
