Skip to main content

Bioengineered Measures for Prevention of Proceeding Soil Degradation as a Result of Climate Change in South East Brazil

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Climate Change Management ((CCM))

Abstract

As a consequence of increasing impact of climate change, particularly uncovered soils in Brazil are significantly vulnerable to soil erosion. Soil erosion, especially at sloped pastures leads to a loss of productive base for agriculture which negatively influences economy. Furthermore, these bare and compacted soils promote floods after heavy rainfall events. The application of efficient bioengineered measures adapted to local conditions can prevent expansion of soil degradation at exposed agriculture sites (pasture land). The objective is to regain a resilient soil covered by protective vegetation by less extended measures. A pasture at a slope of about 3.3 ha in Itaocara (Rio de Janeiro) is used for pilot test. The pasture land is highly affected by soil degradation, due to unsuitable soil management and overgrazing. Based on the results of geodetic survey by University of Leipzig suitable bioengineered measures were conducted using local available and inexpensive materials. Measures include installation of palisades made from eucalyptus and bamboo, development of bush layer/hedge terraces (pre-cultivated bushes placed on a terrace along contours) and transplantation of grass sods. All developed techniques are monitored for control of efficiency and sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Boardman J, Poesen J, Evans R (2003) Socio-economic factors in soil erosion and conservation. Environ Sci Policy 6(1):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhandari G (2014) A review on soil erosion conservation measures in Nepal. Peak J Phys Environ Sci Res 2(3):41–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaschke PM, Trustrum NA, Hicks DL (2000) Impacts of mass movement erosion on land productivity: a review. Prog Phys Geogr 24(1):21–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burri K, Grfa F, Böll A (2009) Revegetation measures improve soil aggregate stability: a case study of a landslide area in Central Switzerland. For Snow Landsc Res 82(1):45–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Dass A, Sudhishri S, Lenka NK, Patnaik US (2010) Runoff capture through vegetative barriers and planting methodologies to reduce erosion, and improve soil moisture, fertility and crop productivity in southern Orissa, India. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 89:45–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Araújo JC, Döll P, Güntner A, Krol M, Abreu CBR, Hauschild M, Mendiondo EM (2004) Water scarcity under scenarios for global climate change and regional development in semiarid Northeastern Brazil. Water Int 29(2):209–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dereczynski C, Silva WL, Marengo J (2013) Detection and projections of climate change in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Am J Clim Chang 2(1):25–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donat M (1995) Bioengineering techniques for streambank restoration: a review of central European practices. Watershed Restoration Project Report No 2, Province of British Columbia, Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks, and Ministry of Forests

    Google Scholar 

  • DRZ Geotecnologia e Consultoria (2012) Plano Municipal de Saneamento Básico. Plano regional de saneamento com base municipalizada nas modalidades água, esgoto e drenagem urbana. Produto 4 – Diagnóstico setorial. – Itaocara, Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  • Evette A, Labonne S, Rey F, Liebault F, Jancke O, Girel J (2009) History of bioengineering techniques for erosion control in rivers in Western Europe. Environ Manag 43(6):972–984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell J (2001) Application of bio-engineering in slope stabilization: experience from Nepal. In: Tianchi L, Chalise SR, Upreti BN (eds) Landslide hazard mitigation in the Hindu Kush-Himalayas, pp 147–161

    Google Scholar 

  • IBGE. http://mapas.ibge.gov.br/bases-e-referenciais/arquivos-raster. Accessed 10 May 2016

  • INMET. http://www.inmet.gov.br/portal/index.php?r=estacoes/estacoesAutomaticas. Accessed 19 Jan 2016

  • IUSS Working Group WRB (2015) World reference base for soil resources 2014, updated 2015. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. World Soil Resources Reports No 106. Food & Agriculture Organization, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Lammeranner W, Rauch HP, Laaha G (2005) Implementation and monitoring of soil bioengineering measures at a landslide in the Middle Mountains of Nepal. Plant Soil 278:159–170

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martinelli LA, Naylor R, Vitousek PM, Moutinho P (2010) Agriculture in Brazil: impacts, costs, and opportunities for a sustainable future. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 2:431–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DR (2007) Soil erosion and agricultural sustainability. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(33):13268–13272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Petrone A, Preti F (2008) Suitability of soil bioengineering techniques in Central America: a case study in Nicaragua. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss Eur Geosci Union 5(1):379–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrone A, Preti F (2009) Soil bioengineering for risk mitigation and environmental restoration in a humid tropical area. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 14:239–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel D, Burgess M (2013) Soil erosion threatens food production. Agriculture 3:443–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel D, Harvey C, Resosudarmo P, Sinclair K, Kurz D, MacNair M, Crist S, Shpritz L, Fitton L, Saffouri R, Blair R (2004) Environmental and economic cost of soil erosion and conservation benefits. Science 267:1117–1123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel D, Kounang N (1998) Ecology of soil erosion in ecosystems. Ecosystems 1:416–426

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Preti F, Giadrossich F (2009) Root reinforcement and slope bioengineering stabilization by Spanish Broom (Spartium junceum L.). Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 13:1713–1726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiechtl HM (1985) FAO Watershed Management Field Manual/F2888—vegetative and soil treatment measures. Food & Agriculture Organization, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Selsam P, Schwartze C (2016) Remote sensing image analysis without expert knowledge—a web-based classification tool on top of Taverna workflow management system. World Multidisciplinary Earth Sciences Symposium, WMESS 2016, Prague (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparovek G, Correchel V, Barretto AG (2007) The risk of erosion in Brazilian cultivated pastures. Sci Agricola 64(1):77–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes A, Grant BD, Fourcaud T, Giadrossich F, Gillies C, Hubble T, Kim JH, Loades KW, Mao Z, McIvor IR, Mickovski SB, Mitchell S, Osman N, Phillips C, Poesen J, Polster D, Preti F, Raymond P, Rey F, Schwarz M, Walker LR (2013) Ecological mitigation of hillslope instability: ten key issues facing researchers and practitioners. Agriculture 3:443–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomaz EL, Luiz JC (2010) Soil loss, soil degradation and rehabilitation in a degraded land area in Guarapuava (Brazil). Land Degrad Dev 23:72–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Oost K, Quine TA, Govers G, De Gryze S, Six J, Harden JW, Giraldez JV (2007) The impact of agricultural soil erosion on the global carbon cycle. Science 318(5850):626–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Oudenhoven APE, Veerkamp CJ, Alkemade R, Leemanns R (2015) Effects on different managements regimes on soil ersosion and surface runoff in semi-arid to sub-humid rangelands. J Arid Environ 121:100–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuazo VHD, Pleguezuelo CRR (2007) Soil-erosion and runoff prevention by plant covers. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 28:65–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Described pilot investigations were undertaken by Vita 34 (business Unit BioPlanta) in close collaboration with University of Leipzig. The project was co-financed by Federal Ministry for Education and Science of Germany (BMBF, support code: 033L162G). We like to thank BMBF and the Rio de Janeiro State Secretariat of Agriculture and Livestock (SEAPEC) which hosted the Rio Rural project for assistance. Further thanks belong to teams of EMATER-Rio, PESAGRO-Rio and EMBRAPA Solos for their support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to André Gerth .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hebner, A. et al. (2018). Bioengineered Measures for Prevention of Proceeding Soil Degradation as a Result of Climate Change in South East Brazil. In: Leal Filho, W., Esteves de Freitas, L. (eds) Climate Change Adaptation in Latin America. Climate Change Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56946-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics