Abstract
A range of definitions, critiques and debates surround positive education. One critique includes the claim that it is neither a unique nor new endeavour. How is positive education different from other mental health promotion programs (e.g. MindMatters, CASEL, World Health Organisation Health Promoting Schools)? How is positive education different from social and emotional learning (Durlak JA, Weissberg RP, Dymnicki AB, Taylor RD, Schellinger KB, Child Dev 82:405–432, 2011)? Is positive education simply positive psychology applied in education or is it a union with pedagogy (Oades LG, Mossman L, The science of wellbeing and positive psychology. In: Slade M, Oades LG, Jarden A (eds) Wellbeing, recovery and mental health. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 7–23, 2017; Slemp GR, Slemp GR, Chin T-C, Kern ML, Siokou C, Loton D, Oades LG, Vella-Brodrick D, Waters L, Waters L, Positive education in Australia: practice, measurement, and future directions. In: Frydenberg E et al (eds) Social and emotional learning in Australia and the Asia Pacific. Springer Nature, Singapore. doi:10.1007/978-981-10-3394-0_6, 2017; Waters L, Sun J, Rusk R, Cotton A, Arch A, Positive education: visible wellbeing and positive functioning in students. In: Slade M, Oades LG, Jarden A (eds) Wellbeing, recovery and mental health. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2017)? In understanding the debates surrounding positive education, it is also useful to understand the broader debates within positive psychology which influences positive education (Kristjánsson K, Virtues and vices in positive psychology: a philosophical critique. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013). In Pawelski’s (J Posit Psychol 11:339–356, 2016a; J Posit Psychol 11:357–365, 2016b) papers on defining the ‘positive’ in positive psychology he draws a useful distinction between the topography (topic or outcome), the target population and the processes of positive psychology. For example, are the outcomes, the population and the processes or constructs used positive? This leads to the question of whether positive education could or should be understood in a similar way. Using this framework applied to positive education will likely lead us to think of wellbeing as the topology/outcome of positive education, students (and sometimes teachers) as the target population with an array of processes (e.g. strengths, gratitude etc.) used in the educational context. Claims as to how positive education is different to existing approaches will likely then lead to discussions of how it is specific to school contexts, takes a whole of school approach (Kern ML, Park G, Eichstaedt JC, Schwartz HA, Sap M, Smith LK, Ungar LH, Psychol Methods 21:507–525. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/met0000091, 2016) or that it is more positive or wellbeing focused than previous mental health approaches. Whilst these debates are conceptually important, from a utilitarian perspective a broader question is how do we improve the wellbeing of the population, in this case through enabling learning about wellbeing?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82, 405–432.
Gee, J. P. (1998). What is literacy? In V. Zamel & R. Spack (Eds.), Negotiating academic literacies: Teaching and learning across languages and cultures. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gordon, R., & Oades, L. G. (2017). Social marketing of wellbeing. In M. Slade, L. G. Oades, & A. Jarden (Eds.), Wellbeing, recovery and mental health (pp. 311–323). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hieronymi, A. (2013). Understanding systems science: A visual and integrative approach. Systems Research, 30, 580–595.
Hogan, M. J. (2008). Modest systems psychology: A neutral complement to positive psychological thinking. Systems Research, 25, 717–732.
Hone, L., Schofield, G., & Jarden, A. (2015). Conceptualizations of wellbeing: Insights from a prototype analysis on New Zealand workers. New Zealand Journal of Human Resource Management, 12(2), 97–118.
Kern, M., Waters, L., Adler, A., & White, M. A. (2015). Measuring whole school wellbeing in students and staff. In M. White & S. Murray (Eds.), Evidence-based approaches to positive education in schools: Implementing a strategic framework for wellbeing in schools (pp. 65–91). Dordrecht: Springer.
Kern, M. L., Park, G., Eichstaedt, J. C., Schwartz, H. A., Sap, M., Smith, L. K., & Ungar, L. H. (2016). Gaining insights from social media language: Methodologies and challenges. Psychological Methods, 21, 507–525. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/met0000091.
Kristjánsson, K. (2013). Virtues and vices in positive psychology: A philosophical critique. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lyubomirsky, S. (2007). The how of happiness: A practical guide to getting the life you want. Macclesfield: Sphere.
Meadows, D. H. (1999). Leverage points: Places to intervene in a system. Hartland: Sustainability Institute.
Oades, L. G., & Mossman, L. (2017). The science of wellbeing and positive psychology. In M. Slade, L. G. Oades, & A. Jarden (Eds.), Wellbeing, recovery and mental health (pp. 7–23). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oades, L. G., Slade, M., & Jarden, A. (2017). Wellbeing and recovery: A possible future. In M. Slade, L. G. Oades, & A. Jarden (Eds.), Wellbeing, recovery and mental health (pp. 324–332). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pawelski, J. O. (2016a). Defining the ‘positive’ in positive psychology: Part I. A descriptive analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 11, 339–356.
Pawelski, J. O. (2016b). Defining the ‘positive’ in positive psychology: Part II. A normative analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 11, 357–365.
Slemp, G. R., Chin, T.-C., Kern, M. L., Siokou, C., Loton, D., Oades, L. G., Vella-Brodrick, D., & Waters, L. (2017). Positive education in Australia: Practice, measurement, and future directions. In E. Frydenberg et al. (Eds.), Social and emotional learning in Australia and the Asia Pacific. Singapore: Springer Nature. doi:10.1007/978-981-10-3394-0_6.
Waters, L., Sun, J., Rusk, R., Cotton, A., & Arch, A. (2017). Positive education: Visible wellbeing and positive functioning in students. In M. Slade, L. G. Oades, & A. Jarden (Eds.), Wellbeing, recovery and mental health. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Anglican Church of Australia Collegiate School of Saint Peter trading as St Peter's College
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Oades, L.G. (2017). Wellbeing Literacy: The Missing Link in Positive Education. In: White, M., Slemp, G., Murray, A. (eds) Future Directions in Well-Being. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56889-8_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56889-8_29
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56888-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56889-8
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)