Introduction: Narratives, Narrating, Narrators

  • Paula Olmos
Part of the Argumentation Library book series (ARGA, volume 31)


Issues regarding the relationship between narration and argumentation, as alternative or contiguous enunciative modes or discursive genres, are currently attracting the interest of many within the interdisciplinary community of argumentation scholars. The present collection of essays has achieved to gather an international group of scholars, mainly, but not exclusively, from the field of Argumentation Theory, and put together an anthology of 11 original chapters on Narration as Argument from different perspectives. It tries to be, in this sense, a panoramic state-of-the art book in which the variety of approaches share nevertheless certain common principles and goals.


Thought Experiment Argumentation Theory Pragmatic Argument Visual Argument Fictionalize Narrative 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Adam, J.-M. 2005. La Linguistique textuelle. Introduction à l’analyse textuelle des discours. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
  2. Bench-Capon, T., and F.J. Bex. 2015. Cases and stories, dimensions and scripts legal knowledge and information systems. JURIX 2015: The twenty eight annual conference. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 279.Google Scholar
  3. Bex, F.J., T. Bench-Capon, and B. Verheij. 2011. What makes a story plausible? The need for precedents. JURIX 2011. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 235.Google Scholar
  4. Bex, F.J., P.J. van Koppen, H. Prakken, and B. Verheij. 2010. A hybrid formal theory of arguments, stories and criminal evidence. Artificial Intelligence and Law 18 (2): 123–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cicero. 1976. De invention, ed. and tr. by H.M. Hubbell. Cambridge, MS: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Coetzee, J.M., and A. Kurtz. 2015. The good story: Exchanges on truth, fiction and psychotherapy. London: Harvill Secker.Google Scholar
  7. Danblon, E., E. de Jonge, E. Kissina, and L. Nicolas. 2008. Argumentation et narration. Bruxelles: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
  8. de Bustos, E. 2000. La metáfora: ensayos interdisciplinares. Madrid: F.C.E.Google Scholar
  9. ———. 2012. Metáfora y terrorismo étnico. Isegoría 46: 105–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. ———. 2014. Metáfora y argumentación. Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar
  11. ———.. 2015. Metáforas, maniobras estratégicas y argumentación. In De la demostración a la argumentación. Ensayos en honor de L. Vega, eds. H. Marraud and P. Olmos, 217–233, Madrid: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.Google Scholar
  12. Govier, T., and L. Ayers. 2012. Logic, parables, and argument. Informal Logic 32 (2): 161–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Green, M. 2010. How and what we can learn from fiction. In A companion to the philosophy of literature, eds. G.L. Hagberg, and W. Jost, 350–366. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. Johnson, R.H. 2000. Manifest rationality: A pragmatic theory of argument. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.Google Scholar
  15. Kvernbekk, T. 2003. On the argumentative quality of explanatory narrative. In Anyone who has a view: Theoretical contributions to the study of argumentation, ed. F.H. van Eemeren, J.A. Blair, C.A. Willard, and F.A. Snoeck Henkemans, 269–282. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lain Entralgo, P. 1950. La historia clínica, historia y teoría del relato patográfico. Barcelona: Salvat Editores.Google Scholar
  17. Olmos, P. 2014a. Classical fables as arguments: Narration and analogy. In Systematic approaches to argument by analogy, ed. H. J. Ribeiro, 189–208. Springer.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 2014b. Story credibility in narrative arguments. In Reflections on theoretical issues in argumentation theory, eds. F.H. van Eemeren, and B. Garssen, 155–167. Springer.Google Scholar
  19. ———. 2016. Narrativity, narrative arguments and practical argumentation. In Argumentation and reasoned action: Proceedings of the first European conference on argumentation, Lisbon 2015. Vol II, eds. D. Mohammed, and M. Lewinski, 743–754. Milton Keynes: College Publications.Google Scholar
  20. Plumer, G. 2011. Novels as arguments. In Proceedings of the 7th conference of the international society for the study of argumentation, ed. F.H. van Eemeren et al. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.Google Scholar
  21. ———. 2015a. On novels as arguments. Informal Logic 35: 488–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. ———. 2015b. A defense of taking some novels as arguments. In Proceedings of the eighth international conference of the international society for the study of argumentation, eds. B.J. Garssen, D. Godden, G. Mitchell, and A.F. Snoeck Henkemans, 1169–1177. Amsterdam: Sic Sat (CD ROM).Google Scholar
  23. ———. 2016. Argumentatively evil storytelling. In Argumentation and reasoned action: Proceedings of the first European conference on argumentation, Lisbon, 9-12 June 2015, eds. D. Mohammed, and M. Lewinski, Vol I, 615–630. London: College Publications. Google Scholar
  24. Toulmin, S., R.D. Rieke, and A. Janik. 1978 (2nd ed. 1984). An introduction to reasoning. New York/London: Macmillan Publishing.Google Scholar
  25. Walton, D. 2012. Story similarity in arguments from analogy. Informal Logic 32 (2): 190–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Linguistics, Modern Languages, Logic and Philosophy of Science, Theory of Literature and Comparative LiteratureUniversidad Autónoma de MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations