Skip to main content

Green Production Attributes and Its Impact in Company’s Sustainability

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Perspectives on Applied Industrial Tools and Techniques

Abstract

The process of selection of a supplier plays a fundamental role in the supply chain. With the emergence of the so-called green attributes this process has become more complicated. Besides, it is unknown if the attributes have an impact on the performance of the company. This chapter presents a structural equation model using four latent variables: green policy attributes, green attributes preproduction, green attributes in production processes, and green attributes postproduction to determine the dependence among them. The relationships define six hypotheses. To validate the model, a sample of 253 interviews to managers of firms located in Mexico was taken. To reduce dimensionality the partial least squares (PLS) method was used. The results indicate that there is a direct and positive impact among the variables analyzed. However, the most significant is the relationship between the green policy and the green attributes preproduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahi P, Searcy C (2013) A comparative literature analysis of definitions for green and sustainable supply chain management. J Clean Prod 52(0):329–341. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.018

  • Akman G (2015) Evaluating suppliers to include green supplier development programs via fuzzy c-means and VIKOR methods. Compu Ind Eng 86:69–82. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2014.10.013

  • Ameknassi L, Aït-Kadi D, Rezg N (2016) Integration of logistics outsourcing decisions in a green supply chain design: a stochastic multi-objective multi-period multi-product programming model. Int J Prod Econ 182:165–184. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.08.031

  • Amindoust A, Ahmed S, Saghafinia A, Bahreininejad A (2012) Sustainable supplier selection: a ranking model based on fuzzy inference system. Appl Soft Comput 12(6):1668–1677. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2012.01.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azadnia AH, Saman MZM, Wong KY (2015) Sustainable supplier selection and order lot-sizing: an integrated multi-objective decision-making process. Int J Prod Res 53(2):383–408. doi:10.1080/00207543.2014.935827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blome C, Hollos D, Paulraj A (2014) Green procurement and green supplier development: antecedents and effects on supplier performance. Int J Prod Res 52(1):32–49. doi:10.1080/00207543.2013.825748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Büyüközkan G (2011) An integrated fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making approach for green supplier evaluation. Int J Prod Res 50(11):2892–2909. doi:10.1080/00207543.2011.564668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Büyüközkan G, Çifçi G (2012) A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers. Expert Syst Appl 39(3):3000–3011. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabral I, Grilo A, Cruz-Machado V (2012) A decision-making model for lean, agile, resilient and green supply chain management. Int J Prod Res 50(17):4830–4845. doi:10.1080/00207543.2012.657970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caniëls MCJ, Gehrsitz MH, Semeijn J (2013) Participation of suppliers in greening supply chains: an empirical analysis of German automotive suppliers. J Purchasing Supply Manage 19(3):134–143. doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2013.02.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çifçi G, Büyüközkan G (2011) A Fuzzy MCDM approach to evaluate green suppliers. Int J Comput Intell Syst 4(5):894–909. doi:10.1080/18756891.2011.9727840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Giuli A, Kostovetsky L (2014) Are red or blue companies more likely to go green? Politics and corporate social responsibility. J Financ Econ 111(1):158–180. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobos I, Vörösmarty G (2014) Green supplier selection and evaluation using DEA-type composite indicators. Int J Prod Econ 157:273–278. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.09.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dweiri F, Kumar S, Khan SA, Jain V (2016) Designing an integrated AHP based decision support system for supplier selection in automotive industry. Expert Syst Appl 62:273–283. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2016.06.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esposito V, Trinchera L, Amato S. (2010) PLS Path Modeling: From Foundation to Recent Developments and Open Issues form Model Assessment and Improvement. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahimnia B, Sarkis J, Davarzani H (2015) Green supply chain management: a review and bibliometric analysis. Int J Prod Econ 162:101–114. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritz MMC, Schöggl J-P, Baumgartner RJ (2017) Selected sustainability aspects for supply chain data exchange: Towards a supply chain-wide sustainability assessment. J Clean Prod 141:587–607. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George D, Mallery, P. (2003) SPSS for windows step by step: a simple guide and reference. 11.0 update

    Google Scholar 

  • Giaquinta M (2009) Mathematical analysis: An introduction to functions of several variables. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Govindan K, Rajendran S, Sarkis J, Murugesan P (2015) Multi criteria decision making approaches for green supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. J Clean Prod 98:66–83. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green Jr KW, Inman RA, Birou LM, Whitten D (2014) Total JIT (T-JIT) and its impact on supply chain competency and organizational performance. Int J Prod Econ 147, Part A:125–135. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.08.026

  • Green KW, Inman RA, Birou LM, Whitten D (2014) Total JIT (T-JIT) and its impact on supply chain competency and organizational performance. Int J Prod Econ 147, Part A:125–135. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.08.026

  • Gurel O, Acar AZ, Onden I, Gumus I (2015) Determinants of the green supplier selection. Procedia—Social Behav Sci 181:131–139. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL (1987) Multivariate data analysis. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair JFB, W C. Babin, B J., Anderson RE (2009) Multivariate data analysis. NJ: Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River@@@

    Google Scholar 

  • Handfield R, Walton SV, Sroufe R, Melnyk SA (2002) Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: A study in the application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process. Eur J Oper Res 141(1):70–87. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00261-2

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hashemi SH, Karimi A, Tavana M (2015) An integrated green supplier selection approach with analytic network process and improved Grey relational analysis. Int J Prod Econ 159:178–191. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.09.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang SH, Keskar H (2007) Comprehensive and configurable metrics for supplier selection. Int J Prod Econ 105(2):510–523. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.04.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys PK, Wong YK, Chan FTS (2003) Integrating environmental criteria into the supplier selection process. J Mater Process Technol 138(1–3):349–356. doi:10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00097-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hursen C, Chun S-H, Hwang HJ, Byun Y-H (2015) The Proceedings of 5th World Conference on Learning, Teaching and Educational LeadershipSupply Chain Process and Green Business Activities: Application to Small and Medium Enterprises. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 186:862–867. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.191

  • Igarashi M, de Boer L, Fet AM (2013) What is required for greener supplier selection? A literature review and conceptual model development. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 19(4):247–263. doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2013.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Igarashi M, de Boer L, Michelsen O (2015) Investigating the anatomy of supplier selection in green public procurement. Journal of Cleaner Production 108, Part A:442–450. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.010

  • Jacobs BW, Singhal VR, Subramanian R (2010) An empirical investigation of environmental performance and the market value of the firm. Journal of Operations Management 28(5):430–441. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2010.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain V, Kumar S, Kumar A, Chandra C (2016) An integrated buyer initiated decision-making process for green supplier selection. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 41:256–265. doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2016.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph F. Hair Jr WCB, Barry J. Babin & Rolph E. Anderson (2013) Multivariate Data Analysis (7th edition) Pretince Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser HM (2011) Mathematical programming for agricultural, environmental, and resource economics. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Kannan D, Govindan K, Rajendran S (2015) Fuzzy Axiomatic Design approach based green supplier selection: a case study from Singapore. J Clean Prod 96:194–208. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kannan D, Jabbour ABLdS, Jabbour CJC (2014) Selecting green suppliers based on GSCM practices: Using fuzzy TOPSIS applied to a Brazilian electronics company. Eur J Oper Res 233(2):432–447. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2013.07.023

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Keshavarz Ghorabaee M, Zavadskas EK, Amiri M, Esmaeili A (2016) Multi-criteria evaluation of green suppliers using an extended WASPAS method with interval type-2 fuzzy sets. J Clean Prod 137:213–229. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ketkar M, Vaidya OS (2012) Study of Emerging Issues in Supply Risk Management in India. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 37:57–66. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kock N (2014) Advanced Mediating Effects Tests, Multi-Group Analyses, and Measurement Model Assessments in PLS-Based SEM. Int J e-Collab 10(1):1–13. doi:10.4018/ijec.2014010101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler M, Müller F, Walk H (2015) Estimation of a regression function corresponding to latent variables. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 162:88–109. doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2014.12.006

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar P, Singh RK, Vaish A (2016) Suppliers’ green performance evaluation using fuzzy extended ELECTRE approach. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy:1–13. doi:10.1007/s10098-016-1268-y

  • Kuo RJ, Lin YJ (2011) Supplier selection using analytic network process and data envelopment analysis. Int J Prod Res 50(11):2852–2863. doi:10.1080/00207543.2011.559487

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lamming R, Hampson J (1996) The Environment as a Supply Chain Management Issue. Br J Manag 7:S45–S62. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.1996.tb00147.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lean HH, Saleh NM, Sohail MS, Saufi NAA, Daud S, Hassan H (2016) 7th International Economics & Business Management Conference (IEBMC 2015)Green Growth and Corporate Sustainability Performance. Procedia Economics and Finance 35:374–378. doi:10.1016/S2212-5671(16)00046-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee V-H, Ooi K-B, Chong AY-L, Lin B (2015) A structural analysis of greening the supplier, environmental performance and competitive advantage. Production Planning & Control 26(2):116–130. doi:10.1080/09537287.2013.859324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leys C, Ley C, Klein O, Bernard P, Licata L (2013) Detecting outliers: Do not use standard deviation around the mean, use absolute deviation around the median. J Exp Soc Psychol 49(4):764–766. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Likert R (1932) A Technique for the measumerement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology 22(140):1–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Luthra S, Garg D, Haleem A (2016) The impacts of critical success factors for implementing green supply chain management towards sustainability: an empirical investigation of Indian automobile industry. J Clean Prod 121:142–158. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch SM (2003) Missing data

    Google Scholar 

  • Maniatis P (2016) Investigating factors influencing consumer decision-making while choosing green products. J Clean Prod 132:215–228. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merschmann U, Thonemann UW (2011) Supply chain flexibility, uncertainty and firm performance: An empirical analysis of German manufacturing firms. Int J Prod Econ 130(1):43–53. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.10.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noci G (1997) Designing ‘green’ vendor rating systems for the assessment of a supplier’s environmental performance. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management 3(2):103–114. doi:10.1016/S0969-7012(96)00021-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omurca SI (2013) An intelligent supplier evaluation, selection and development system. Appl Soft Comput 13(1):690–697. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2012.08.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rehman MA, Seth D, Shrivastava RL (2016) Impact of green manufacturing practices on organisational performance in Indian context: An empirical study. J Clean Prod 137:427–448. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei J, Nispeling T, Sarkis J, Tavasszy L (2016) A supplier selection life cycle approach integrating traditional and environmental criteria using the best worst method. J Clean Prod 135:577–588. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal R, Rosnow RL (1991) Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis. McGraw Hill, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Rostamzadeh R, Govindan K, Esmaeili A, Sabaghi M (2015) Application of fuzzy VIKOR for evaluation of green supply chain management practices. Ecol Ind 49:188–203. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.09.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkis J, Dhavale DG (2015) Supplier selection for sustainable operations: A triple-bottom-line approach using a Bayesian framework. Int J Prod Econ 166:177–191. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.11.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkis J, Nehaman, G., and Priest, J. (1996) A Systemic evaluations model for environmentally friendly conscious business practices and strategy. International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment:281–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenherr T, Modi SB, Benton WC, Carter CR, Choi TY, Larson PD, Leenders MR, Mabert VA, Narasimhan R, Wagner SM (2012) Research opportunities in purchasing and supply management. Int J Prod Res 50(16):4556–4579. doi:10.1080/00207543.2011.613870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scur G, Barbosa ME (2017) Green supply chain management practices: Multiple case studies in the Brazilian home appliance industry. J Clean Prod 141:1293–1302. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaik M, Abdul-Kader W (2011) Green supplier selection generic framework: a multi-attribute utility theory approach. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering 4(1):37–56. doi:10.1080/19397038.2010.542836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen L, Olfat L, Govindan K, Khodaverdi R, Diabat A (2013) A fuzzy multi criteria approach for evaluating green supplier’s performance in green supply chain with linguistic preferences. Resour Conserv Recycl 74:170–179. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.09.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh A (2014) Supplier evaluation and demand allocation among suppliers in a supply chain. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 20(3):167–176. doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2014.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira AA, Jabbour CJC, de Sousa Jabbour ABL, Latan H, de Oliveira JHC (2016) Green training and green supply chain management: evidence from Brazilian firms. J Clean Prod 116:170–176. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng M-L (2011) Green supply chain management with linguistic preferences and incomplete information. Appl Soft Comput 11(8):4894–4903. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2011.06.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng M-L, Chiu ASF (2013) Evaluating firm’s green supply chain management in linguistic preferences. J Clean Prod 40:22–31. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.08.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villanueva-Ponce R, Garcia-Alcaraz J, Cortes-Robles G, Romero-Gonzalez J, Jiménez-Macías E, Blanco-Fernández J (2015) Impact of suppliers’ green attributes in corporate image and financial profit: case maquiladora industry. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 80(5–8):1277–1296. doi:10.1007/s00170-015-7082-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner SM, Kemmerling R (2014) Supply chain management executives in corporate upper echelons. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 20(3):156–166. doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2014.01.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter S, Lasch R (2016) Environmental and social criteria in supplier evaluation – Lessons from the fashion and apparel industry. J Clean Prod 139:175–190. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wold S, Trygg J, Berglund A, Antti H (2001) Some recent developments in PLS modeling. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst 58(2):131–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh W-C, Chuang M-C (2011) Using multi-objective genetic algorithm for partner selection in green supply chain problems. Expert Syst Appl 38(4):4244–4253. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.09.091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Nault BR, Tu Y (2015) A dynamic pricing strategy for a 3PL provider with heterogeneous customers. Int J Prod Econ 169:31–43. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.07.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Q, Dou Y, Sarkis J (2010) A portfolio-based analysis for green supplier management using the analytical network process. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 15(4):306–319. doi:10.1108/13598541011054670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Q, Tian Y, Sarkis J (2012) Diffusion of selected green supply chain management practices: an assessment of Chinese enterprises. Production Planning & Control 23(10–11):837–850. doi:10.1080/09537287.2011.642188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu W, He Y (2017) Green product design in supply chains under competition. Eur J Oper Res. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2016.08.053

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José Roberto Mendoza-Fong .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mendoza-Fong, J.R., García-Alcaraz, J.L., Ochoa-Domínguez, H.d.J., Cortes-Robles, G. (2018). Green Production Attributes and Its Impact in Company’s Sustainability. In: García-Alcaraz, J., Alor-Hernández, G., Maldonado-Macías, A., Sánchez-Ramírez, C. (eds) New Perspectives on Applied Industrial Tools and Techniques. Management and Industrial Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56871-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56871-3_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56870-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56871-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics