Abstract
As the building industry moves towards embracing new sustainable practice, outcomes are less assured than in the past. “Gaps” are reported in predicted and actual outcomes, indicating that “green” buildings are not performing as expected (e.g. Fedoruk et al. 2015; Newsham et al. 2012; Bartlett et al. 2014). Are owners and occupants of such buildings getting what they paid for? Bordass et al. (2004) suggest that “credibility gaps” are not necessarily due to mistakes but rather assumptions made at the design stage are not well enough informed by monitoring buildings in-use. Akerstream et al. (2012) point out that most green building rating systems such as Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), Green Globes, and Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM) have focused on predicted performance at the design stage. Delivered performance is rarely voluntarily verified by building owners. Thus, measurement and monitoring of in-use performance of “green” buildings is crucial to advance confidence and innovation in sustainable design.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Akerstream, T., Knirsch, A., & Pauls, M. (2012). Manitoba hydro place: Energy efficiency 2.0. Dallas, TX. ASHRAE Transactions, 119(1), Special section p 1.
ASHRAE. (2010). Performance measurement protocols for commercial buildings. Atlanta, GA: ASHRAE.
Baird, G. (2010). Sustainable buildings in practice: What the users think. New York: Routledge.
Baird, G., & Dykes, C. (2010). Acoustic conditions in sustainable buildings—Results of a worldwide survey of users’ perceptions. Journal of Building Acoustics, 17, 291–304.
Bartlett, K., Brown, C., Chu, A. M., Ebrahimi, G., Gorgolewski, M., Hodgson, M., Mallory-Hill, S., Ouf, M., Scannell, L., & Turcato, A. (2014). Do our green buildings perform as intended? In Paper presented at World Sustainable Building Conference (SBE2014), Barcelona, Spain. Paper retrieved from: http://iisbecanada.ca/umedia/cms_files/Conference_Paper_1.pdf. Accessed 18 Nov 2016.
Fedoruk, L. E., Cole, R. J., Robinson, J. B., & Cayuela, A. (2015). Learning from failure: Understanding the anticipated–achieved building energy performance gap. Building Research & Information, 43(6), 750–763.
Bordass W., Cohen R., & Field, J. (2004). Energy performance of non-domestic buildings: Closing the credibility gap. In Paper presented at Building Performance Congress, Frankfurt. Paper retrieved from: http://www.usablebuildings.co.uk/Pages/Unprotected/EnPerfNDBuildings.pdf. Accessed 18 Nov 2016.
Leaman, A., & Bordass, B. (2007). Are users more tolerant of “green” buildings? Building Research & Information., 35(6), 662–673.
Leaman, A., Stevenson, F., & Bordass, B. (2010). Building evaluation: Practice and principles. Building Research & Information, 38(5), 564–577.
Mallory-Hill, S., Preiser, W. F. E., & Watson, C. (Eds.). (2012). Enhancing building performance. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Newsham, G., Birt, B., Arsenault, C., Thompson, L., Veitch, J., Mancini, S., Galasiu, A., Gover, B., Macdonald, I., & Burns, G. (2012). Do green buildings out-perform conventional buildings? Indoor environment and energy performance in North American offices, Research Report RR-329: National Research Council Canada.
Newsham, G., Mancini, S., & Birt, B. (2009). Do LEED-certified buildings save energy? Yes, but…. Energy and Buildings, 41, 897–905.
REALPac. (2012).Water benchmarking pilot report: Performance in the Canadian Office Sector. Retrieved from: http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.realpac.ca/resource/resmgr/ industry_sustainability_-_water_benchmarking/rp_water_report_05_hr_final.pdf. Accessed 18 Nov 2016.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mallory-Hill, S., Gorgolewski, M. (2018). Mind the Gap: Studying Actual Versus Predicted Performance of Green Buildings in Canada. In: Preiser, W., Hardy, A., Schramm, U. (eds) Building Performance Evaluation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56862-1_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56862-1_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56861-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56862-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)