Advertisement

The Media Use of Diaspora in a Conflict Situation: A Case Study of Venezuelans in Finland

  • Virpi SalojärviEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Many Venezuelan emigrants have an emotional connection and/or they have family members and friends in the country of origin, and that is why they seek to find reliable information on the conflict situation in Venezuela. Therefore, they keep in touch with family members, read mainstream news and use different social media platforms. Thus, what kind of impact the conflict has on the media use and how events reported in the media are interpreted is investigated in this study of Venezuelan diaspora in Finland by using social media ethnography. There are internal and external factors behind the media use. External factors come from societies of the host and origin countries. Internal factors rise from family connections and identity construction concerning personal national identity or political activism.

References

  1. Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  2. Aranda, E. M., Hughes, S., & Sabogal, E. (2014). Making a life in multiethnic Miami: Immigration and the rise of a global city. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. Basch, L., Glick Schiller, N., & Szanston Blanc, C. (1994). Nations unbound: Transnational projects, postcolonial predicaments, and deterritorialized nation-states‬. Basel: Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
  4. Behrouzian, G., Nisbet, E. C., Dal, A., & Carkoglu, A. (2016). Resisting censorship. How citizens navigate closed media environments. International Journal of Communication, 10, 4345–4367.Google Scholar
  5. Bisbal, M. (2009). La comunicacion… Un debate sobre la democracia. In M. Bisbal (Ed.), Hegemonia y control comunicacional (pp. 7–22). Caracas: Editorial Alfa.Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, R. (2008). Global diasporas: An introduction. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
  7. Curran, J. (1993). Rethinking the media as a public sphere. In P. Dahlgren & C. Sparks (Eds.), Communication and citizenship (pp. 27–58). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Delgado-Flores, C. (2006). La gestió́n comunicacional en la administración Chávez: De la dominació́n mediá́tica al control estatal. Comunicació́n, 134, 10–14. Caracas: Centro Gumilla.Google Scholar
  9. DeLuca, K. (1999). Articulation theory: A discursive grounding for rhetorical practice. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 32(4), 334–348.Google Scholar
  10. Freedom House. Freedom of the press 2016. Available at https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-press/freedom-press-2016. Accessed 22 Sept 2016.
  11. Gilbert, E. & Karahalios, K. (2009). Predicting tie strength with social media. Paper presented to Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, April 4–9, Boston. http://social.cs.uiuc.edu/people/gilbert/pub/chi09-tie-gilbert.pdf.
  12. Guerrero, M. A. (2014). The ‘captured liberal’ model of media systems in Latin America. In M. A. Guerrero & M. Márquez-Ramírez (Eds.), Media systems and communication policies in Latin America (pp. 43–65). New York: The Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar
  13. Hall, S. (1986). On postmodernism and articulation: An interview with Stuart Hall. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 10, 45–60.Google Scholar
  14. Hallin, D., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems. Three models of media and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hallin, D. C., & Papathanassopoulos, S. (2002). Political clientelism and the media: Southern Europe and Latin America in comparative perspective. Media, Culture and Society, 24, 175–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hatakka, N. (2012). Journalismin perussuomalainen uudelleentulkinta sosiaalisessa mediassa. In V. Pernaa & E. Railo (Eds.), Jytky. Eduskuntavaalien 2011 mediajulkisuus (pp. 350–395). Turku: Kirja-Aurora.Google Scholar
  17. Honeycutt, C., & Herring, S. (2009). Beyond microblogging: Conversation and collaboration via Twitter. In Proceedings of 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1–10).Google Scholar
  18. Internet World Stats. Internet usage in the European Union. www.internetworldstats.com/stats9.htm. Accessed 24 Sept 2016.
  19. Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T., & Tseng, B. (2009). Why we Twitter: An analysis of a microblogging community. In H. Zhang, M. Spiliopoulou, B. Mobasher, C. L. Giles, A. McCallum, O. Nasraoui, J. Srivastava, & J. Yen (Eds.), Advances in web mining and web usage analysis (pp. 118–138). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kurmanaev, A., & Russo, C. (2014). Venezuelan bonds slide after S&P lowered credit rating. Bloomberg. www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-09-16/venezuela-s-rating-cut-by-s-p-to-ccc-on-deteriorating-economy.html. Accessed 3 July 2016.
  21. Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985/2001). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  22. Levitt, P. (2001). The transnational villagers. Berkley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  23. Loveless, M. (2008). Media dependency: Mass media as sources of information in the democratizing countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Democratization, 15(1), 162–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Madianou, M., & Miller, D. (2013). Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(2), 169–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mancini, P. (2012). Instrumentalization of the media vs. political parallelism. Chinese Journal of Communication, 5(3), 262–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Miller, D., Costa, E., Haynes, N., McDonald, T., Nicolescu, R., Sinanan, J., Spyer, J., Venkatraman, S., & Wang, X. (2016). How the world changed social media. London: UCL Press. Available at http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1474805/1/How-the-World-Changed-Social-Media.pdf.
  27. Morley, D. (2000). Home territories: Media, mobility and identity. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mouffe, C. (2000). Democratic paradox. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  29. Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics: Thinking the world politically. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  30. Murphy, P. D., & Kraidy, M. M. (2003). Media ethnography: Local, global, or translocal? In P. D. Murphy & M. M. Kraidy (Eds.), Global media studies: Ethnographic perspectives. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Neuman, W. (2014, July 14). Sale of paper in Venezuela raises fear on freedom. New York Times. www.nytimes.com/2014/07/15/world/americas/sale-of-paper-in-venezuela-raises-fears-on-freedom.html?_r=0. Accessed 8 Aug 2014.
  32. Oulasvirta, A., Lehtonen, E., Kurvinen, E., & Raento, M. (2010). Making the ordinary visible in microblogs. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 14(3), 237–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Overseas Security Advisory Council (OSAC). Venezuela 2015 Crime and Safety report. Available at http://www.osac.gov/pages/ContentReportDetails.aspx?cid=17137. Accessed 1 March 2016.
  34. Pink, S., Horst, H., Portill, J., Hjorths, L., Lewis, T., & Racchi, J. (2015). Ethnography in a digital world. In S. Pink, H. Horst, J. Portill, L. Hjorths, T. Lewis, & J. Racchi (Eds.), Digital Ethnography: Principles and Practice (pp. 1–18). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Pons, C. (2014). Crime hobbles Venezuela’s economy. Businessweek. Available at http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-01-30/venezuelas-high-crime-rate-hobbles-economy. Accessed 3 July 2016.
  36. Postill, J., & Pink, S. (2012). Social media ethnography: The digital research in a messy web. Media International Australia, 145, 123–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Quiñones, R. (2012). Situación para 2011. Medios y política en Venezuela. Comunicación, 158, 28–35. Caracas: Centro Gumilla.Google Scholar
  38. Quintanilla Muñoz, L. (2015, October 12). Venezuela vive un dramático proceso migratorio. Available at https://dolartoday.com/venezuela-viveun-dramatico-proceso-migratorio-en-15-anos-se-han-marchado-1-6-millones-de-venezolanos/. Accessed 20 Aug 2016.
  39. Reporters without Borders. Venezuela. Available at https://rsf.org/en/venezuela. Accessed 22 Sept 2016.
  40. Salojärvi, V. (2016). The media in the core of political conflict: Venezuela during the last years of Hugo Chávez’s Presidency. Doctoral Dissertation, Publications of the Faculty of Social Sciences 2016: 23. University of Helsinki, Helsinki.Google Scholar
  41. Samet, R. (2013). The photographer’s body: Populism polarization, and the uses of victimhood in Venezuela. American Ethnologist, 40(3), 525–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shumow, Moses. (2010). Transnationalism and media use among venezuelan immigrants in South Florida. International Journal of Communication, 4, 377–397.Google Scholar
  43. Siapera, E. (2010). Cultural diversity and global media: The mediation of difference. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). Migration. Available at http://www.unfpa.org/migration. Accessed 20 Aug 2016.
  45. Voltmer, K. (2013). The media in transitional democracies. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  46. Weisbrot, M., & Ruttenberg, T. (2010, October 14). Television in Venezuela: Who dominates the media? Venezuela Analysis. http://venezuelanalysis.com/analysis/5860. Accessed 9 Oct 2015.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations