Advertisement

Assessment of the Reinforcement Capacity of Composite Repair Systems for Pipelines with Interacting Defects

  • I. LambrescuEmail author
  • V. A. Chebanenko
  • D. V. Gusakov
  • A. V. Morgunova
Chapter
Part of the Engineering Materials book series (ENG.MAT.)

Abstract

This chapter is devoted to the investigation of a damaged pipeline segment with two volumetric surface defects (VSDs) located on the outer or inner surfaces. The segment was subjected to static inner pressure in the linear elastic domain, since when stresses go beyond this limit the defect is no longer accepted. The main attention is focused on the interaction between these two defects and on how this interaction influences the stress–strain state in the pipeline segment. Moreover, the problem with two volumetric surface defects was divided into two cases. First, when defects are not repaired at all. Second, when composite wrap was applied in the damaged zone. In order to solve these problems, series of computational experiments were performed with the help of finite element modeling using ANSYS and Siemens NX packages.

Keywords

Pipeline Two defects Corrosion Finite element In-service repair ANSYS NX 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was conducted with partial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (No. 15-08-00849a, 16-08-00740, 16-58-52013 MNT_a) and Russian State Mission 007-01114-16 PR (project 0256-2015-0074).

References

  1. 1.
    A.P. Teixeira, C.G. Soares, T.A. Netto, S.F. Estefen, Reliability of pipelines with corrosion defects. Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip. 85(4), 228 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Cerit, K. Genel, S. Eksi, Numerical investigation on stress concentration of corrosion pit. Eng. Fail. Anal. 16(7), 2467 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J.E. Abdalla Filho, R.D. Machado, R.J. Bertin, On the failure pressure of pipelines containing wall reduction and isolated pit corrosion defects. Comput. Struct. 132, 22 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M.K. Khalajestani, M.R. Bahaari, Investigation of pressurized elbows containing interacting corrosion defects. Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip. 123, 77 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S.R. Hall, M.D. Raizenne, D.L. Simpson, A proposed composite repair methodology for primary structure. Composites 20(5), 479 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    W.F. Cole, Technical justification of repairs to composite laminates. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 19(2), 107 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Chris, J. Bedoya, An updated perspective on using composite materials to reinforce offshore pipelines and risers. Proceedings of IOPF, vol. 1 (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. Nariman, H. Ronagh, A. Virk, Composite repair of pipelines, considering the effect of live pressure-analytical and numerical models with respect to ISO/TS 24817 and ASME PCC-2. Compos. B Eng. 58, 605 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    I. Lambrescu, M. Chebakov, V. Chebanenko, D. Gusakov, A. Morgunova, Investigation of the mutual influence of two machined volumetric surface defects of transmission pipeline, in Innovative Solutions in Repair of Gas and Oil Pipelines, ed. by E. Barkanov, M. Mihovski, V. Sergienko (Bulgarian Society for Non-destructive Testing Publishers, Sofia, 2016), p. 183Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    V.A. Chebanenko, D.V. Gusakov, I. Lambrescu, A.V. Morgunova, in Sensitivity Analysis of the Static Problem for a Pipe with Two Volumetric Surface Defects, ed. by I.A. Parinov, S.-H. Chang, M.A. Jani. Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Physics, Mechanics of New Materials and Their Applications (Nova Science Publishers, New York, 2017), p. 367 (in press)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    ASME B31.8-2010, in Gas Transmission and Distribution Piping Systems (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    ASME B31G-1991 & 2009, in Manual for Determining the Remaining Strength of Corroded Pipelines, A supplement to ASME B31 Code for Pressure Piping (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    API Standard 759:2007/ASME FFS-1:2007, Fitness for Service (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    BS 7910:2005, in Guide to Methods for Assessing the Acceptability of Flaws in Metallic Structures (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. Lambrescu
    • 3
    Email author
  • V. A. Chebanenko
    • 1
    • 2
  • D. V. Gusakov
    • 1
  • A. V. Morgunova
    • 1
  1. 1.I.I Vorovich Mathematics, Mechanics and Computer Sciences InstituteSouthern Federal UniversityRostov-on-DonRussia
  2. 2.Southern Scientific Center of Russian Academy of ScienceRostov-on-DonRussia
  3. 3.Petroleum-Gas University of PloieştiPloieştiRomania

Personalised recommendations