Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Simulated Environments in Architecture Education. Improving the Student Motivation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Advances in Information Systems and Technologies (WorldCIST 2017)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 571))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The increasing graphic quality and ease of use of the current generation of videogame technology compels educators to rethink how architecture students learn. This paper presents the results of an educational experience with architecture students that explored the suitability of virtual environments as an educational tool. Students explored the simulated environment of an architectural proposal and filled a survey asking whether the experience had made them reason about some fundamental qualities of space. The results revealed that the virtual environment was capable of making students reflect on the functional, formal or material qualities of architectural spaces, suggesting a new education avenue using gamification or serious games strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Horne, M., Thompson, E.M.: The role of virtual reality in built environment education. J. Educ. Built Environ. 3(1), 5–24 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Suwa, M., Tversky, B.: What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? a protocol analysis. De. Stud. 18(4), 385–403 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Orland, K.: Twitch plays everything: how livestreaming is changing game design. http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2015/10/twitch-plays-everything-how-livestreaming-is-changing-game-design/

  4. Fonseca, D., Redondo, E., Valls, F., Villagrasa, S.: Technological adaptation of the student to the educational density of the course. a case study: 3D architectural visualization. Comput. Hum. Behav. (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Villagrasa, S., Fonseca, D., Durán, J.: Teaching case: applying gamification techniques and virtual reality for learning building engineering 3D arts. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, pp. 171–177. ACM, October 2014

    Google Scholar 

  6. Institute of Play (2013). http://www.instituteofplay.org/work/projects/quest-schools/quest-to-learn/

  7. Manrique, V.: Epic win blog: the 35 gamification mechanics toolkit v2.0 (2013). http://www.epicwinblog.net/2013/10/the-35-gamification-mechanics-toolkit.html

  8. Kapp, K.M.: The Gamification of Learning and Instruction: Game-Based Methods and Strategies for Training and Education. Wiley, Hoboken (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zichermann, G., Cunningham, C.: Gamification by Design: Implementing Game Mechanics in Web and Mobile Apps. O’Reilly Media Inc, Newton (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bloom, B.S.: Thought processes in lectures and discussions. J. Gen. Educ. 7, 160–169 (1953)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cronk, M.: Using gamification to increase student engagement and participation in class discussion. In: Amiel, T., Wilson, B. (Eds.) Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia. Hypermedia and Telecommunications, pp. 311–315 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bennett, S., Maton, K., Kervin, L.: The, “digital natives” debate: a critical review of the evidence. Brit. J. Educ. Technol. 39(5), 775–786 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. TNS Infratest Germany: Data from the Global Connected Consumer Survey (CCS) Global Device Usage and Internet Stats. Accessed 28 Sept 2016, 10 June 2015. https://www.google.com/publicdata/explore?ds=dg8d1eetcqsb1_&hl=en&dl=en

  14. Entertainment Software Association. 2015 Essential Facts About the Computer and Video Game Industry (p. 20). Entertainment Software Association (2015). www.theesa.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/ESA-Essential-Facts-2015.pdf

  15. Yee, N., Ducheneaut, N., Nelson, L.: Online gaming motivations scale: development and validation. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY, USA, pp. 2803–2806. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., Nacke, L.: From game design elements to gamefulness: defining “gamification.” In: Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments, New York, USA, pp. 9–15. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Holbert, N.R., Wilensky, U.: Constructible authentic representations: designing video games that enable players to utilize knowledge developed in-game to reason about science. Technol. Knowl. Learn. 19(1–2), 53–79 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Iosup, A., Epema, D. An experience report on using gamification in technical higher education. In: Proceedings of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, New York, NY, USA, pp. 27–32. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lieberoth, A.: Shallow gamification: testing psychological effects of framing an activity as a game. Games Cult. 10(3), 229–248 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Davidson, D. (Ed.): Beyond Fun: Serious Games and Media. Pittsburgh (PA): ulu.com (2010). http://press.etc.cmu.edu/files/BeyondFun-DrewDavidson-etal-web.pdf

  21. Aldrich, C.: Simulations and the Future of Learning: An Innovative (and Perhaps Revolutionary) Approach to e-Learning, 1st edn. Pfeiffer, San Francisco (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fonseca, D., Martí, N., Redondo, E., Navarro, I., Sánchez, A.: Relationship between student profile, tool use, participation, and academic performance with the use of augmented Reality technology for visualized architecture models. Comput. Hum. Behav. 31, 434–445 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fonseca, D., Valls, F., Redondo, E., Villagrasa, S.: Informal interactions in 3D education: Citizenship participation and assessment of virtual urban proposals. Comput. Hum. Behav. 55, 504–518 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Likert, R.: A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology 22(140), 55 (1932)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kravets, D.: How the NFL—not the NSA—is impacting data gathering well beyond the gridiron. http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/09/the-nfl-is-reshaping-the-surveillance-society-xbox-one-experience-and-gambling/

  26. Burton-Chellew, M.N., Mouden, C.E., West, S.A.: Conditional cooperation and confusion in public-goods experiments. PNAS 113, 1291–1296 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kuliga, S.F., Thrash, T., Dalton, R.C., Hölscher, C.: Virtual reality as an empirical research tool — exploring user experience in a real building and a corresponding virtual model. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 54, 363–375 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Fonseca, D., Redondo, E., Villagrasa, S.: Mixed-methods research: a new approach to evaluating the motivation and satisfaction of university students using advanced visual technologies. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 14(3), 311–332 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Villagrasa, S., Fonseca, D., Durán, J.: Teaching case: applying gamification techniques and virtual reality for learning building engineering 3D arts. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, pp. 171–177. ACM, October 2014

    Google Scholar 

  30. Redondo, E., Fonseca, D., Valls, F., Olivares, A.: Enseñanza basada en dispositivos móviles. Nuevos retos en la docencia de la representación arquitectónica. Caso de estudio: Los Tianguis de Tonalá, Jalisco, México. EGA Revista de expresión gráfica arquitectónica 21(27), 64–73 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the programs BIA2016-77464-C2-1-R of the National Plan for Scientific Research, Development and Technological Innovation 2013-2016, Government of Spain, titled “Gamificación para la enseñanza del diseño urbano y la integración en ella de la participación ciudadana (ArchGAME4CITY)” and BIA2016-77464-C2-2-R of the National Plan for Scientific Research, Development and Technological Innovation 2013-2016, Government of Spain, titled “Diseño Gamificado de visualización 3D con sistemas de realidad virtual para el estudio de la mejora de competencias motivacionales, sociales y espaciales del usuario (EduGAME4CITY)”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. AR&M, Barcelona School of Architecture, BarcelonaTech, Catalonia Polithecnic University, Av/Diagonal 649, 08028, Barcelona, Spain

    Francesc Valls & Ernest Redondo

  2. EGA-II, Barcelona School of Building Construction, EPSEB, Catalonia Polithecnic University, Av/Dr. Marañon, 44-50, 08028, Barcelona, Spain

    Albert Sánchez

  3. GRETEL – Grup de Recerca En Technology Enhanced Learning, La Salle – Ramon Llull University, C/Sant Joan de La Salle 42, 08022, Barcelona, Spain

    David Fonseca, Sergi Villagrasa & Isidro Navarro

Authors
  1. Francesc Valls
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ernest Redondo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Albert Sánchez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. David Fonseca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sergi Villagrasa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Isidro Navarro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Fonseca .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. DEI/FCT, Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, Baixo Mondego, Portugal

    Álvaro Rocha

  2. Nova IMS, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal

    Ana Maria Correia

  3. College of Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA

    Hojjat Adeli

  4. DSI/EEUM, Universidade do Minho, Guimarães, Portugal

    Luís Paulo Reis

  5. DIMES, Università della Calabria, Arcavacata di Rende, Italy

    Sandra Costanzo

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Valls, F., Redondo, E., Sánchez, A., Fonseca, D., Villagrasa, S., Navarro, I. (2017). Simulated Environments in Architecture Education. Improving the Student Motivation. In: Rocha, Á., Correia, A., Adeli, H., Reis, L., Costanzo, S. (eds) Recent Advances in Information Systems and Technologies. WorldCIST 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 571. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56541-5_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56541-5_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56540-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56541-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation