Advertisement

Balanced Scorecard: Today’s Challenges

Conference paper
  • 2k Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 569)

Abstract

In today’s global landscape organizations are pressured to develop new capabilities such as flexibility or expertise to respond to the ever-changing technology, competition, and customer preferences. Companies cannot be competitive or successful if their business and information systems and technology (IS/IT) strategies are not aligned. Nowadays, with the growing importance of intangible assets, performance measurement tools must be able to capture this new and important reality. Measuring organizational performance is a difficult and ongoing challenge for managers. Balanced Scorecard (BSC) is a powerful tool that gives a fast, but comprehensive view of the business including operational measures on customer satisfaction, organization’s innovation, activities improvement, as well as financial measurements. This study empirically examines how the BSC has been applied in practice and whether different BSC designs result in varying performance outcomes. In this paper the authors address the BSC and promote the discussion about the strengths and the limitations, underlining the latest developments and future research.

Keywords

Balanced Scorecard Strategy map Performance measurements Strategic alignment IS/IT investments 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The research work where this article is based on, has been supported by FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, in the context of financed projects under the Reference UID/SOC/04521/2013.

References

  1. 1.
    Ashurst, C., Doherty, N.F.: Towards the formulation of “a best practice” framework for benefits realization in IT projects. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Eval. 6, 1–10 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gomes, J., Romão, M.: How benefits management helps Balanced Scorecard to deal with business dynamic environments. Tourism Manage. Stud. 9(1), 129–138 (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Henderson, J.C., Venkatraman, N.: Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Syst. J. 38, 472–484 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Porter, M.E.: From competitive advantage to corporate strategy. Harvard Bus. Rev., 65(3) 43–59 (1987)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Galliers, R.D.: Strategic information systems planning: myths, reality and guidelines for successful implementation. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 1(1), 55–64 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Luftman, J.N. (ed.): Competing in the Information Age: Strategic Alignment in Practice. Oxford University Press, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tallon, P.P., Kraemer, K.L., Gurbaxani, V.: Executive’s perceptions of the business value of information technology: a process-oriented approach. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 16, 145–173 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Voelpel, S.C., Leibold, M., Eckhoff, R.A.: The tyranny of the Balanced Scorecard in the innovation economy. J. Intellect. Capital 7(1), 43–60 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bose, S., Thomas, K.: Applying the Balanced Scorecard for better performance of intellectual capital. J. Intellect. Capital 8(4), 653–665 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Neely, A., Mills, J., Platts, K., Bourne, M.: Designing performance measures: a structured approach. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 17(11), 1131–1152 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Atkinson, A., Waterhouse, J., Wells, R.: A stakeholder approach to strategic performance measurement. Sloan Manag. Rev. 38(3), 5 (1997). SpringGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Epstein, M., Manzoni, J.F.: Implementing corporate strategy: from tableaux de board to Balanced Scorecards. Eur. Manag. J. 2, 190–203 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: How strategy maps frame an organization’s objectives. Financ. Executive 20(2), 40 (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Barney, J.: Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Manag. 17(1), 99–120 (1991)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Prahalad, C.K., Hamel, G.: The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Bus. Rev. 68(3), 79–91 (1990)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Marr, B., Schiuma, G., Neely, A.: Intellectual capital-defining key performance indicators for organizational knowledge assets. Bus. Process Manag. J. 10(5), 551–569 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Maltz, A.C., Shenhar, A.J., Reilly, R.R.: Beyond the Balanced Scorecard: refining the search for organizational success measures. Long Range Plan. 36, 187–204 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Neely, A., Adams, C., Kennerley, M.: The Performance Prism. Prentice Hall, London (2002)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sharma, M.K., Bhagwat, R., Dangayach, G.S.: Practice of performance measurement: experience from Indian SMEs. Int. J. Globalization Small Bus. 1(2), 183–213 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Otley, D.: Performance management: a framework for management control systems research. Manag. Acc. Res. 10, 363–382 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Eccles, R.G., Pyburn, P.J.: Creating a comprehensive system to measure performance. Manag. Acc. 74(4), 41–44 (1992)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: Balanced Scorecard: measures that drive performance. Harvard Bus. Rev. January - February (1992)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Olve, N.G., Petri, C.J., Roy, J., Roy, S.: Making Scorecards Actionable: Balancing Strategy and Control. Wiley, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hoque, Z., James, W.: Linking Balanced Scorecard measures to size and market factors: impact on organizational performance. J. Manag. Acc. Res. 12(1), 1–17 (2000)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kald, M., Nilsson, F.: Performance measurement at Nordic companies. Eur. Manag. J. 18(1), 113–127 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Speckbacher, G., Bischof, J., Pfeiffer, T.: A descriptive analysis on the implementation of Balanced Scorecards in German-speaking countries. Manag. Acc. Res. 14(4), 361–387 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    De Haas, M.: Strategic dialogue: in search of goal coherence. Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Eindhoven University of Technology (2000)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Frigo, M., Krumwiede, K.: The Balanced Scorecard: a winning performance measurement system. Strateg. Finance, 81(7), 50–54 (2000)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pandey, I.M.: Balanced Scorecard: myth and reality. Vikalpa 30(1), 51–56 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: Having trouble with your strategy? Then map it. Harvard Bus. Rev. 78(5), 167–176 (2000)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Venkatraman, G., Gering, M.: The Balanced Scorecard. Ivey Bus. J. 64(3), 10–13 (2000)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Richardson, S.: The key elements of Balanced Scorecard success. Ivey Bus. J. 69(2), 7–9 (2004)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Casey, W., Peck, W.: A balanced view of Balanced Scorecard. Executive Leadership Group, White Paper. The Leadership Lighthouse Series (2004)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Burney, L., Widener, S.K.: Strategic performance measurement systems, job-relevant information, and managerial behavioral responses-role stress and performance. Behav. Res. Acc. 19, 43–69 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Basu, R., Little, C., Millard, C.: Case study: a fresh approach of the Balanced Scorecard in the Heathrow Terminal 5 project. Measuring Bus. Excellence 13(4), 22–33 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tayler, W.B.: The Balanced Scorecard as a strategy-evaluation tool: the effects of implementation involvement and a causal-chain focus. Acc. Rev. 85(3), 1095–1117 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Banchieri, L., Planas, C.F., Rebull, M.V.S.: What has been said, and what remains to be said, about the Balanced Scorecard? J. Econ. Bus. 29(1), 155–192 (2011). Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of EconomicsGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hoque, Z.: 20 years of studies on the Balanced Scorecard: trends, accomplishments, gaps and opportunities for future research. Br. Acc. Rev. 46(1), 33–59 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Nørreklit, H.: The Balanced Scorecard - a critical analysis of some of its assumptions. Manag. Acc. Res. 11, 65–88 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hudson, M., Smart, A., Bourne, M.: Theory and practice in SME performance measurement systems. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 21(8), 1096–1115 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Platts, K., Tan, K.: Designing linked performance measures: a connectance based approach. In: 12th International Working Seminar on Production Economics, Innsbruck, Austria (2002)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kennerley, M., Neely, A.: Measuring performance in a changing business environment. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 23(2), 213–229 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Nørreklit, H.: The Balanced Scorecard: what is the score? a rhetorical analysis of the Balanced Scorecard. Acc. Organ. Soc. 28(6), 591–619 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Anand, M., Sahay, B., Saha, S.: Balanced Scorecard in Indian companies. Vikalpa 30(2), 11–25 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Molleman, B.: The challenge of implementing the Balanced Scorecard. In: Proceedings of the 6th Twente Student Conference on IT, Enschede (2008)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Othman, R.: How Balanced Scorecard can fail: some caves. Borneo Bull., 2 June (2009)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Antonsen, Y.: The downside of the Balanced Scorecard: a case study from Norway. Scand. J. Manag. 30(1), 40–50 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Figge, F., Hahn, T., Schaltegger, S., Wagner, M.: The sustainability Balanced Scorecard - linking sustainability management to business strategy. Bus. Strat. Environ. 11(5), 269–284 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    McAdam, R., Walker, T.: An inquiry into Balanced Scorecards within best value implementation in UK local government. Public Adm. 81, 873–892 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Jiménez-Zarco, A.I., Martinez-Ruiz, M.P., Gonzalez_Benito, O.: Performance Measurement System (PMS) integration into new product innovation: a literature review and conceptual framework. Acad. Mark. Sci. Rev. 9, 1–16 (2006)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Decoene, V., Bruggeman, W.: Strategic alignment and middle-level managers’ motivation in a Balanced Scorecard setting. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 26(4), 429–448 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Huang, C., Hu, Q.: Achieving IT-business strategic alignment via enterprise-wide implementation of Balanced Scorecards. Inf. Syst. Manag. 24(2), 173–184 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Chang, L.-C.: The NHS performance assessment framework as a Balanced Scorecard approach: limitations and implications. Int. J. Public Sect. Manag. 20(2), 101–117 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Othman, R.: Enhancing the effectiveness of Balanced Scorecard with scenario planning. Int. J. Prod. Perform. Manag. 57(3), 259–266 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Griffith, R., Neely, A.: Performance pay and managerial experience in multitask teams: evidence from within a firm. J. Labor Econ. 27(1), 49–82 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Burney, L.L., Swanson, N.J.: The relationship between Balanced Scorecard characteristics and manager´s job satisfaction. J. Manag. Issues XXII 2, 166–181 (2010)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Yang, K.M., Cho, Y.W., Choi, S.H., Park, J.H., Kang, K.S.: A study on development of Balanced Scorecard using multiple attribute decision making. J. Softw. Eng. Appl. 3, 286–272 (2010)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Barnabè, F.: A system dynamics-based Balanced Scorecard to support strategic decision making: insights from a case study. Int. J. Prod. Perform. Manag. 60(5), 446–473 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Al-Ashaab, A., Flores, M., Doultsinou, A., Magyar, A.: A Balanced Scorecard for measuring the impact of industry–university collaboration. Prod. Plan. Control Manag. Oper. 22(5–6), 554–570 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Marcos, A.F., Rouyet, J.I., Bosch, A.: An IT Balanced Scorecard design under service management philosophy. In: Proceedings of 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2012)Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Amado, C.A.F., Santos, S.P., Marques, P.M.: Integrating the data envelopment analysis and the Balanced Scorecard approaches for enhanced performance assessment. Omega 40, 390–403 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Gomes, J., Romão, M., Caldeira, M.: The benefits management and Balanced Scorecard strategy map: how they match. Int. J. IT/Business Alignment Governance 4(1), 44–54 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Lin, Q.L., Liu, L., Liu, H.C., Wang, D.J.: Integrating hierarchical Balanced Scorecard with fuzzy linguistic for evaluating operating room performance in hospitals. Expert Syst. Appl. 40, 1917–1924 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Alolaha, T., Stewart, R.A., Panuwatwanicha, K., Mohamed, S.: Determining the causal relationships among Balanced Scorecard perspectives on school safety performance: case of Saudi Arabia. Accid. Anal. Prev. 68(2014), 57–74 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Waruhiu, H.: Rebalancing the Balanced Scorecard: a sequel to Kaplan and Norton. Eur. J. Bus. Manag. 6(29), 116–124 (2014)Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Ozmantar, Z.K., Gedikoglu, T.: Design principles for the development of the Balanced Scorecard. Int. J. Educ. Manag. 30(5), 622–634 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Alharbi, F., Atkins, A., Stanier, C., Al-Buti, H.A.: Strategic value of cloud computing in healthcare organisations using the Balanced Scorecard approach: a case study from a Saudi hospital. Procedia Comput. Sci. 98, 332–339 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ISEGLisboaPortugal

Personalised recommendations