Skip to main content

Dealing with Variability: A Control-Based Configuration of Process Variants

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Advances in Information Systems and Technologies (WorldCIST 2017)

Abstract

Process models are often reused in different contexts, resulting in a large number of related process model variants. Such process variants pursue the same or similar business objective, but may differ in their logic (i.e., process logic) due to varying application context at either design time or run-time. We propose a control approach to support the selection and configuration of process variants. Our approach is based on supervisory control theory, which is a formal way to build supervisors for discrete-event systems. In our approach, the supervisors will control the selection and configuration of process variants, based on constraints of certain context. We divide our approach in two main parts: (1) a supervised questionnaire to support configuration and selection of a process variant, and (2) a formal procedure to linking the questionnaire to a process variant from a reference process model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Reichert, M.U., Weber, B.: Enabling Flexibility in Process-Aware Information Systems: Challenges, Methods, Technologies. Springer, Heildelberg (2012)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Hallerbach, A., Bauer, T., Reichert, M.: Configuration and management of process variants. In: Brocke, J., Rosemann, M. (eds.) Handbook on Business Process Management 1. International Handbooks on Information Systems, pp. 237–255. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Hallerbach, A., Bauer, T., Reichert, M.: Issues in modeling process variants with provop. In: Ardagna, D., Mecella, M., Yang, J. (eds.) BPM 2008. LNBIP, vol. 17, pp. 56–67. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-00328-8_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Lu, R., Sadiq, S., Governatori, G., Yang, X.: Defining adaptation constraints for business process variants. In: Abramowicz, W. (ed.) BIS 2009. LNBIP, vol. 21, pp. 145–156. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-01190-0_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Hallerbach, A., Bauer, T., Reichert, M.: Capturing variability in business process models: the provop approach. J. Soft. Maint. Evol. Res. Pract. 22(6–7), 519–546 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hallerbach, A., Bauer, T., Reichert, M.: Managing process variants in the process lifecycle. In: 10th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, pp. 154–161 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hallerbach, A., Bauer, T., Reichert, M.: Context-based configuration of process variants. In: 3rd International Workshop on Technologies for Context-Aware Business Process Management, pp. 31–40 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. La Rosa, M., Aalst, W.M.P., Dumas, M., Hofstede, A.H.M.: Questionnaire-based variability modeling for system configuration. Soft. Syst. Model 8(2), 251–274 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. der Aalst, W.M.P., Dreiling, A., Gottschalk, F., Rosemann, M., Jansen-Vullers, M.H.: Configurable process models as a basis for reference modeling. In: Bussler, C.J., Haller, A. (eds.) BPM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3812, pp. 512–518. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). doi:10.1007/11678564_47

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Aalst, W.M., Basten, T.: Inheritance of workflows: an approach to tackling problems related to change. Theoret. Comp. Sci. 270(1), 125–203 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. La Rosa, M., Dumas, M., Ter Hofstede, A.H., Mendling, J.: Configurable multi-perspective business process models. Info. Sys. 36(2), 313–340 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. La Rosa, M., Dumas, M., Hofstede, A.H.: Modelling business process variability for design-time configuration. In: Handbook of Research on Business Process Modeling, pp. 204–228 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ramadge, P.J.G., Wonham, W.M.: The control of discrete event systems. Proc. IEEE 77(1), 81–98 (1989)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Ramadge, P.J.G., Wonham, W.M.: Supervisory control of a class of discrete event processes. SIAM J. Control Optim. 25(1), 206–230 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Santos, E.A.P., Vieira, A.D., Schaidt, S., Loures, E.F.R.: Modeling constraint-based processes: a supervisory control theory application. ComSIS 11(4), 1229–1247 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ayora, C., Torres, V., Reichert, M., Weber, B., Pelechano, V.: Towards run-time flexibility for process families: open issues and research challenges. In: Rosa, M., Soffer, P. (eds.) BPM 2012. LNBIP, vol. 132, pp. 477–488. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-36285-9_49

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Schaidt, S., Freitas Rocha Loures, E., Vieira, A.D., Santos, E.A.P.: Supervision of constraint-based processes: a declarative perspective. In: Demey, Y.T., Panetto, H. (eds.) OTM 2013. LNCS, vol. 8186, pp. 134–143. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-41033-8_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Santos, E.A.P., Francisco, R., Vieira, A.D., F.R. Loures, E., Busetti, M.A.: Modeling business rules for supervisory control of process-aware information systems. In: Daniel, F., Barkaoui, K., Dustdar, S. (eds.) BPM 2011. LNBIP, vol. 100, pp. 447–458. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-28115-0_42

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Cassandras, C.G., Lafortune, S.: Introduction to Discrete Event Systems. Springer, New York (2008)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Schobbens, P.Y., Heymans, P., Trigaux, J.C.: Feature diagrams: a survey and a formal semantics. In: Requirements Engineering, pp. 136–145. IEEE Computer Society (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Batory, D.: Feature models, grammars, and propositional formulas. In: Obbink, H., Pohl, K. (eds.) SPLC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3714, pp. 7–20. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). doi:10.1007/11554844_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Santos, E.A., Francisco, R., Pesic, M., Aalst, W.M.: Supervisory control service for supporting flexible processes. Ind. Manag. Data Sys. 113(7), 1007–1024 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sauro Schaidt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Schaidt, S., Santos, E.A.P., Vieira, A.D., de Freitas Rocha Loures, E. (2017). Dealing with Variability: A Control-Based Configuration of Process Variants. In: Rocha, Á., Correia, A., Adeli, H., Reis, L., Costanzo, S. (eds) Recent Advances in Information Systems and Technologies. WorldCIST 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 569. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56535-4_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56535-4_42

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56534-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56535-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics