Advertisement

A Governance Model for Managing Lightweight IT

  • Bendik BygstadEmail author
  • Jon Iden
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 569)

Abstract

The widespread introduction of lightweight IT—smartphones, tablets, the Internet of Things, and the growth of third-party app developers—has become a challenge for many organizations. Local units and end-users increasingly are acquiring and implementing lightweight IT outside the realm of the IT function. The trend is driven by competent users’ need for innovative IT services, enabled by the consumerization of digital technologies. Lightweight IT entails exciting business opportunities; however, guidance for managers on how to deal with this development has been very limited. In this paper, we investigate which IT governance models organizations can apply to manage lightweight IT. The managerial challenge is to balance the innovative potential of lightweight IT with the requirements of good governance. Building on the particular challenges of lightweight IT and the extant literature on end-user computing, we present a framework with four alternative governance models. We evaluate the framework through four e-health case studies.

Keywords

Governance Lightweight IT 

References

  1. 1.
    Bygstad, B.: Generative innovation: a comparison of lightweight and heavyweight IT. J. Inf. Technol. (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lacity, M.C., Willcocks, L.P.: Robotic process automation at Telefonica O2. MIS Q. Executive 15, 21–35 (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liu, R., Liu, H., Kwak, D., Xiang, Y., Borcea, C., Nath, B., Iftode, L.: Balanced traffic routing: Design, implementation, and evaluation. Ad Hoc Netw. 37, 14–28 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kaur, S.: The revolution of tablet computers and apps. IEEE Consumer Electr. Mag. (2013). doi: 10.1109/MCE.2012.2223371
  5. 5.
    Stieglitz, S., Lattemann, C., Brockmann, T.: Mobile applications for knowledge workers and field workers. Mob. Inf. Syst. (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lattanzio, F., Abbatecola, A.M., Bevilacqua, R.: Advanced technology care innovation for older people in Italy: necessity and opportunity to promote health and wellbeing. J. Am. Med. Direct. Assoc. 15, 457–466 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Willcocks, L.P., Lacity, M.C., Craig, A.: The IT Function and Robotic Process Automation. London School of Economics. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/
  8. 8.
    Horlach, B., Drews, P., Schirmer, I.: Bimodal IT: Business-IT alignment in the age of digital transformation. In: Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik (MKWI) (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gyöery, A., Cleven, A., Uebernickel, F., Brenner, W.: Exploring the shadows: IT governance approaches to user-driven innovation. In: ECIS (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gartner: Bimodal IT: how to be digitally agile without making a mess (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Weill, P., Ross, J.W.: IT Governance. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B., Venkatraman, N.: Special issue: information technology and organizational governance: the IT governance cube. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 30, 7–12 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tiwana, A.: Platform Ecosystems. Aligning Architecture, Governance and Strategy. Morgan Kaufmann, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Eaton, B., Elaluf-Calderwood, S., Sørensen, C., Yoo, Y.: Dynamic structures of control and generativity in digital ecosystem service innovation: the cases of the Apple and Google mobile app stores. Working paper, London School of Economics (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Alavi, M., Nelson, R.R., Weiss, I.R.: Strategies for end user computing: an integrative framework. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 4(3), 28–49 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lyytinen, K., Yoo, Y., Boland, R.: Digital product innovation within four classes of innovation networks. Inf. Syst. J. 26, 47–75 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gregory, R.W., Keil, M., Muntermann, J., Mähring, M.: Paradoxes and the nature of ambidexterity in IT transformation programs. Inf. Syst. Res. 26, 57–80 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ghazawneh, A., Henfridsson, O.: Balancing platform control and external contribution in third party development: the boundary resources model. Inf. Syst. J. 23, 173–192 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of InformaticsUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
  2. 2.Norwegian School of EconomicsBergenNorway

Personalised recommendations