System Dynamics Modeling for the Complexity of Knowledge Creation Within Adaptive Large Programs Management

  • Rasha Abou SamrahEmail author
  • Khaled Shaalan
  • Amal Al Ali
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 569)


This research is an attempt to illustrate the variables that are mentioned in the literature to deal with the unexpected future risks that are increasingly threatening the success of the large program. The research is a qualitative conceptualization using secondary data collection from the literature review and by criticizing it reaching a structural validation of the system dynamic simple model of how to increase the level of the stock of the unknown unknowns or the complexity chaotic knowledge for better risk management and creativity in achieving a competitive edge. The unknow-unknowns are still representing a black box and are under the control of the god act. This is a try only to concurrent and foreword adaptation with the unknown future. The manager can use this model to conceptualize the internal and external variables that can be linked to the business being objectives. By using this model the manager can minimized the side effects of the productivity and efficiency standardization.


Knowledge creation System dynamics Large programs 


  1. Bernstein, J., Feinberg, G.: Heinz R. Pagels. Phys. Today 42(5), 98–100 (1989).
  2. Lissack, M.R., Roos, J.: The Next Common Sense: The e-Manager’s Guide to Mastering Complexity. Nicholas Brealey Publishing, London (2002)Google Scholar
  3. Aucoin, B.M.: Right – Brain Project Management: A Complementary Approach, p. 132. Management Concepts, Vienna (2007)Google Scholar
  4. Ibid., pp. 115–123Google Scholar
  5. Fryer, P.: A brief description of complex adaptive systems and complexity theory. Accessed July 2014
  6. DeCarlo, D.: Engaging Your Right Brain for Increased Agility, July 2007. Accessed July 2014
  7. Pagels, H.: The Dreams of Reason: The Computer and the Rise of the Sciences of Complexity. Simon & Schuster (1988). Hardcover: ISBN 0-671-62708-2, 1989, Bantam paperback: ISBN 0-553-34710-1Google Scholar
  8. Shenhar, A.: Building a Strategic System Approach to NASA’s Project and Program Management. Phase 1 Final Report: Identifying NASA-Specific Strategic Project Type, December 2004Google Scholar
  9. Loch, C., DeMeyer, A., Pich, M.: Managing the Unknown: A New Approach to managing High Uncertainty and Risk In Projects. Wiley, New York (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Leitch, M.: The Basics, March, 2003. Accessed July 2014
  11. Thalmann, S., Seeber, I., Peinl, R., Pawlowski, J., Hetmank, L., Kruse, P., Bick, M.: Ontology-based Standardization on knowledge exchange in social knowledge management environments. In: Conference 2010, Month 1–2, 2010, City, State, Country. Copyright 2010 ACM 1-58113-000-0/00/0010 (2010)Google Scholar
  12. Grisogono, A-M.: Co-adaptation. In: Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, vol. 6039 (2006). Article No. 603903Google Scholar
  13. Cats-Baril, W., Thompson, R.: Information Technology and Management. Irwin Group Inc. (1997)Google Scholar
  14. Cyert, R.M., March, J.G.: A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey (1963)Google Scholar
  15. Hossain, L., Reay Atkinson, S., D’Eredita, M., Wigand, R.T.: Towards a Mech-Organic Perspective for Knowledge Sharing Networks in Organizations. Accepted for publication: 23rd CIRP Design Conference (2013), Berlin, Germany (2012)Google Scholar
  16. Arrow, K.: The Limits of Organization. Norton and Company, New York (1974)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Milton, N.: Filtering an organisation’s critical knowledge - creating a proactive learning strategy for maximum effectiveness. KM Rev., 28–33, June-July 2006Google Scholar
  18. Dreyfus, H.L., Dreyfus, S.E.: Mind Over Machine. The Free Press, New York (1987)Google Scholar
  19. Barlas, Y.: System Dynamics: Systemic feedback Modeling for Policy Analysis. Industrial Engineering Department, Bogvaziçi University, Istanbul, Turkey (2001)Google Scholar
  20. Grey, S.: Unknown Unknowns. Published under Enterprise risk management and ISO 31000, Project risk management and IEC 62198, Risk assessment, July 2014. Accessed July 2014
  21. Blackwell, P.: Power-point Presentation for Large Programs Course. British University in Dubai. Ph.D. Project Management Program (2014)Google Scholar
  22. Linstone, H.A., Turoff, M.: Delphi: a brief look backward and forward. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change (2010). doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2010.09.011 Google Scholar
  23. Snowden, D., Boone, M.: Harvard Business Review, November 2007Google Scholar
  24. Gardner, D., Tetlock, P.: Overcoming our aversion to acknowledging our ignorance. CATO Unbound, July 2011.
  25. DeMeyer, A.: Knowns, Unknowns and Project Management… (2009).
  26. Reay, S., Goodez, A., Lesher, S., Caldwell, N., Steel, J., Shoupe, D.: What are the real risks of knowing and not knowing – leading knowledge in Cyber. In: 19th ICCRTS: C2 Agility: Lessons Learned from Research and Operations. University of Sydney, NSW 2006, T +61 2 9351 5216, F +61 29351 8642. Paper ID 119. Track 1: Concepts, Theory, and PolicyGoogle Scholar
  27. Rothman, J.: Manage Your Project Portfolio. Pragmatic Programmer, March 2011Google Scholar
  28. Hasan, H., Kazlauskas, A.: Making Sense of IS with the Cynefin Framework. In: Association for Information Systems. AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), July 2009Google Scholar
  29. Anonymous, Project Management Body of Knowledge. The Project Management Institute (PMI), July 2004Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rasha Abou Samrah
    • 1
    Email author
  • Khaled Shaalan
    • 2
  • Amal Al Ali
    • 3
  1. 1.Higher Colleges of TechnologySharjahUAE
  2. 2.British UniverisityDubaiUAE
  3. 3.University of SharjahSharjahUAE

Personalised recommendations