Abstract
Contemporary research-intensive universities need not only to maintain but also to enhance the quality of their teaching and learning. Diverse strategies are used to raise the quality of teaching and learning, and these typically respond to both institutional and disciplinary cultures. However, there is sometimes a failure to effectively integrate quality enhancement initiatives at the individual (micro) level, the intermediate (meso) level, and the institutional (macro) level within institutions. In particular, the essential role of social processes at the meso level is sometimes overlooked. There may be more that research-intensive universities can do to foster a vibrant teaching and learning culture that facilitates professional conversations in relation to teaching and learning enhancement at and across different levels and within and between disciplinary boundaries. This chapter reports on a modified ‘community of practice’ (CoP) approach adopted at the University of Hong Kong (HKU) to drive change and diffuse innovation at the meso level. HKU’s CoP approach incorporates several unique features that have helped the university to address the specific opportunities and challenges it faces at the collective level, where fostering dialogue plays such a key role.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bamber, V., Saunders, M., Trowler, P., & Knight, P. (2009). Enhancing learning, teaching, assessment and curriculum in higher education. Maidenhead: SRHE and Open University Press.
Biggs, J. (1996). Assessing learning quality: Reconciling institutional, staff and educational demands. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 21, 5–16.
Blackwell, R., & Blackmore, P. (Eds.). (2003). Towards strategic staff development in higher education. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Bromage, A. (2006). The management of planned change: An interdisciplinary perspective. In L. Hunt, A. Bromage, & B. Tomkinson (Eds.), The realities of change in higher education. Interventions to promote teaching and learning (pp. 1–14). London: Routledge.
Buckley, S. (2012). Higher education and knowledge sharing: From ivory tower to twenty-first century. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 49, 333–344.
Bucklow, C., & Clark, P. (2003). A new approach to professionalising teaching and accrediting training: The institute for learning and teaching in higher education. In R. Blackwell & P. Blackmore (Eds.), Towards strategic staff development in higher education (pp. 67–79). London: SRHE.
Carless, D. (2006). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 219–233.
Carless, D. (2015). Excellence in university assessment: Learning from award-winning practice. London: Routledge.
Gibbs, G. (2013). Reflections on the changing nature of educational development. International Journal for Academic Development, 18, 4–14.
Golden, J. E. (2016). Supporting online faculty through communities of practice: Finding the faculty voice. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53, 84–93.
Gordon, G., & Land, R. (2013). Meanings of enhancement. In R. Land & G. Gordon (Eds.), Enhancing quality in higher education: international perspectives. London: Routledge.
Green, W., & Ruutz, A. (2008). Fit for purpose: Designing a faculty-based community of (teaching) practice. In Engaging Communities, Proceedings of the 31st HERDSA Annual Conference, Rotorua, 1–4 July 2008, pp. 163–172.
Hounsell, D. (2011). Graduates for the 21st century: Integrating the enhancement themes. Institutional activities. Glasgow: QAA Scotland. http://www.enhancementthemes.ac.uk/enhancement-themes/completed-enhancement-themes/graduates-for-the-21st-century
Hounsell, D., & Rigby, S. (2013). Leading change in assessment and feedback. Case examples and a guide to action (Stimulus paper). London: Leadership Foundation for Higher Education. https://www.lfhe.ac.uk/en/research-resources/publications/index.cfm/ST%20-%2011
Hounsell, D., & Zou, T. X. P. (in press). Surfacing and sharing advances in assessment: A communities of practice approach. In D. Carless, S. Bridges, C. Chan, & R. Glofcheski (Eds.), Scaling up assessment for learning in higher education. Dordrecht: Springer.
Hunt, L., Bromage, A., & Tomkinson, B. (Eds.). (2006). The realities of change in higher education: Interventions to promote teaching and learning. London: Routledge.
Keay, J., May, H., & O’Mahony, J. (2014). Improving learning and teaching in transnational education: Can communities of practice help? Journal of Education for Teaching, 40, 251–266.
Knight, P., & Trowler, P. R. (2000). Department-level cultures and the improvement of learning and teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 25, 69–83.
Land, R., & Gordon, G. (Eds.). (2013). Enhancing quality in higher education: International perspectives. London: Routledge.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leask, B. (2015). Internationalising the curriculum. Oxford: Routledge.
Mårtensson, K., Roxå, T., & Stensaker, B. (2014). From quality assurance to quality practices: An investigation of strong microcultures in teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education, 39, 534–545.
Pharo, E., Davison, A., McGregor, H., Warr, K., & Brown, P. (2014). Using communities of practice to enhance interdisciplinary teaching: Lessons from four Australian institutions. Higher Education Research and Development, 33, 341–354.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, L. (1990). Basics of grounded theory methods. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Teekens, H. (2007). Internationalisation at home: An introduction. In H. Teekens (Ed.), Internationalisation at home: Ideas and ideals, EAIE occasional paper 20 (pp. 1–11). Amsterdam: European Association for International Education (EAIE).
Times Higher Education. (2016). The world’s most international universities 2016. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/features/200-most-international-universities-world-2016. Accessed 15 Jan 2016.
Trowler, P., & Cooper, A. (2002). Teaching and learning regimes: Implicit theories and recurrent practices in the enhancement of teaching and learning through educational development programmes. Higher Education Research and Development, 21, 221–240.
Trowler, P., Fanghanel, J., & Wareham, T. (2005). Freeing the chi of change: The Higher Education Academy and enhancing teaching and learning in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 30, 427–444.
Trowler, P., Saunders, M., & Bamber, V. (2009). Enhancement theories. In V. Bamber, M. Saunders, P. Trowler, & P. Knight (Eds.), Enhancing learning, teaching, assessment and curriculum in higher education (pp. 7–15). Maidenhead: SRHE and Open University Press.
University of Hong Kong. (2015). Quality manual. http://tl.hku.hk/quality-manual/. Accessed 1 Jan 2016.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Wenger, E., Trayner, B., & de Laat, M. (2011). Promoting and assessing value creation in communities and networks: A conceptual framework. Rapport 18, Ruud de Moor Centrum, Open University of the Netherlands.
Wenger-Trayner, E., & Wenger-Trayner, B. (2015). Systems conveners in complex landscapes. In E. Wenger-Trayner, M. Fenton-O’Creevy, S. Hutchinson, C. Kubiak, & B. Wenger-Trayner (Eds.), Learning in landscapes of practice: Boundaries, identity, and knowledgeability in practice-based learning (pp. 99–108). London: Routledge.
Wenger-Trayner, E., Fenton-O’Creevy, M., Hutchinson, S., Kubiak, C., & Wenger-Trayner, B. (Eds.). (2015). Learning in landscapes of practice: Boundaries, identity, and knowledgeability in practice-based learning. London: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: Details of the Join-the-Conversation Events
Appendix: Details of the Join-the-Conversation Events
Theme | Topic/Strand | Time | No. of participants (including faculty members, support staff members, and students) |
|---|---|---|---|
Assessment and feedback | 1. Assessment in the Common Core Curriculum | May 2015 | 40 |
2. Wise assessment: Towards a community of practice (in conjunction with the International Conference of Assessment for Learning in Higher Education) | May 2015 | 90a | |
3. Assessing experiential learning | Jun 2015 | 90a | |
4. Enhancing feedback | Jun 2015 | 39 | |
Internationalisation of Teaching and Learning | 5. Learning benefits of internationalisation | Jan 2016 | 32 |
6. Curriculum Internationalisation in the Common Core | Mar 2016 | 28 | |
7. Enriching international learning experiences in your course: What can digital and virtual learning do for you? | Apr 2016 | 48 | |
8. Assessment and feedback in experiential learning | Jun 2016 | 47 | |
9. Community of practice – Aspects of internationalisation (one-day event) | Jun 2016 | 71 | |
Total number of participants | 485 | ||
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bilbow, G.T., Hounsell, D., Zou, T. (2017). Fostering Dialogue About Practices. In: Stensaker, B., Bilbow, G., Breslow, L., van der Vaart, R. (eds) Strengthening Teaching and Learning in Research Universities. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56499-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56499-9_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56498-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56499-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)