Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Life Cycle Assessment pp 605–631Cite as

Cradle to Cradle and LCA

Abstract

Cradle to Cradle (C2C) offers a positive vision of a future, where products are radically redesigned to be beneficial to humans and the environment. The idea is not to reduce negative impacts (as in LCA), but to increase positive impacts . This chapter presents the C2C concept and its relationship with the circular economy , the C2C certification and examples of C2C certified or inspired products and systems. This is followed by a comparison of C2C with eco-efficiency and LCA . Because of their important differences, we conclude that care should be taken when combing C2C and LCA, e.g. using LCA to evaluate products inspired by C2C. We then provide an in-depth analysis of the conflicts between C2C and LCA and offer solutions. Finally, we reflect upon how LCA practitioners can learn from C2C in terms of providing a vision of a sustainable future, creating a sense of urgency for change and communicating results in an inspiring way.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Cradle to Cradle® and C2C® are trademarks of MBDC, LLC. Used with permission.

References

  • Bjørn, A., Hauschild, M.Z.: Absolute versus relative environmental sustainability. J. Ind. Ecol. 17, 321–332 (2013). doi:10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00520.x

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bjørn, A., Hauschild, M.Z.: Introducing carrying capacity based normalization in LCA: framework and development of references at midpoint level. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 20, 1005–1018 (2015)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Braungart, M., McDonough, W., Bollinger, A.: Cradle-to-cradle design: creating healthy emissions—a strategy for eco-effective product and system design. J. Clean Prod. 15, 1337–1348 (2007). doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.08.003

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsberg Group: Carlsber Group CSR Report 2014: Growing Responsibility Together (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • de Pauw, I.C., Kandachar, P., Karana, E.: Assessing sustainability in nature-inspired design. Int. J. Sustain. Eng. 8, 5–13 (2015). doi:10.1080/19397038.2014.977373

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • EC: Closing the loop—an EU action plan for the Circular Economy. COM (2015) 614 final. European Commission (2015a)

    Google Scholar 

  • EC: Implementation of the Circular Economy Action Plan. European Commission (2015b). http://ec.europa.eu/environment/circular-economy/index_en.htm

  • EEA: Earnings, jobs and innovation: The role of recycling in a green economy. EEA Report 8/2011. European Environment Agency. ISSN: 1725-9177. Copenhagen, Denmark (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • EMF: Towards the Circular Economy Vol. 1: An Economic and Business Rationale for an Accelerated Transition. Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Cowes (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • EMF: Delivering the Circular Economy: a Toolkit for Policymakers. Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Cowes (2015a)

    Google Scholar 

  • EMF: Towards a Circular Economy: Business Rationale for an Accelerated Transition. Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Cowes (2015b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstetter, P., Madjar, M., Ozawa, T.: Happiness and sustainable consumption—psychological and physical rebound effects at work in a tool for sustainable design. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 11, 105–115 (2006)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Huijbregts, M.A.J., Steinmann, Z.J.N., Elshout, P.M.F., et al.: ReCiPe2015: a life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level report I : characterisation factors (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO: ISO 14024:1999. Environmental Labels and Declarations—Type I Environmental Labelling—Principles and Procedures. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleijn, R., van der Voet, E.: Resource constraints in a hydrogen economy based on renewable energy sources: an exploration. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 14, 2784–2795 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.066

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, N.: This Changes Everything. Simon & Schuste, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • MBDC: The Making of the Next Industrial Revolution at Ford Motor Company. McDonough Braungart Design Chemistry, Charlottesville (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, W., Braungart, M.: Cradle to Cradle—Remaking the Way We Make Things, 1st edn. North Point Press, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, W., Braungart, M.: The Upcycle: Beyond Sustainability-Designing for Abundance. North Point Press, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • MIE: Usability of Life Cycle Assessment for Cradle to Cradle Purposes—Position Paper. Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment, Utrecht (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • NEL: Product Groups. Nordic Ecolabelling (2016). http://www.nordic-ecolabel.org/criteria/product-groups/?p=1

  • Niero, M., Olsen, S.I.: Circular economy: to be or not to be in a closed product loop? A Life Cycle Assessment of aluminium cans with inclusion of alloying elements. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 114, 18–31 (2016). doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.06.023

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Niero, M., Hauschild, M.Z., Hoffmeyer, S.B., Olsen, S.I.: Combining eco-efficiency and eco-effectiveness for continuous loop beverage packaging systems: learnings from the Carlsberg Circular Community. J. Ind. Ecol. (in review) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ny, H., Macdonald, J.P., Broman, G., et al.: Sustainability constraints as system boundaries—an approach to making life-cycle management strategic. J. Ind. Ecol. 10, 61–77 (2006)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Partzsch, L., Hughes, S.: Food versus fuel: governance potential for water rivalry. Food Ethics (2010). doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-5765-8_10

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • PII: Guidance for Applying the Final Manufacturing Stage Requirements in the Cradle to Cradle CertifiedTM Product Standard, Versions 3.0 and 3.1 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • PII: Cradle to Cradle Certified(TM) Product Standard Version 3.1. Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • PII: Overall Product Scoring. In: Get Cradle to Cradle CertifiedTM. Cradle to Cradle Prod. Innov. Inst. (2017a). http://www.c2ccertified.org/get-certified/levels

  • PII: Cradle to Cradle Certified Products Registry. In: Cradle to Cradle Prod. Innov. Inst. (2017b). http://www.c2ccertified.org/products/registry

  • PLI: Cradle to Cradle. In: Prod. Inst. (2013). http://www.product-life.org/en/cradle-to-cradle

  • Running, S.W.: A measurable planetary boundary for the biosphere. Science 337, 1458–1459 (2012). doi:10.1126/science.1227620

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sayre, N.F.: The genesis, history, and limits of carrying capacity. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 98, 120–134 (2008). doi:10.1080/00045600701734356

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., et al.: Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science (Washington D C) 347, 736 (2015). doi:10.1126/science.1259855

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Struijs, J., Beusen, A., Zwart, D., Huijbregts, M.: Characterization factors for inland water eutrophication at the damage level in life cycle impact assessment. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 16, 59–64 (2010). doi:10.1007/s11367-010-0232-z

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Thygesen, A.M., Wernberg, O., Skou, E., Sommer, S.G.: Effect of incineration temperature on phosphorus availability in bio-ash from manure. Environ. Technol. 32, 633–638 (2011). doi:10.1080/09593330.2010.509355

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Tobias, C.: Exclusive interview with Dr. Michael Braungart: Businesses should do more good, rather than less bad. In: eco-business.com—Asia Pacific’s Environ. Bus. community (2010). http://www.eco-business.com/news/2010/oct/25/businesses-should-do-more-good-rather-less-bad/

  • UL: The Sins of Greenwashing: Home and Family Edition. Underwriters Laboratories (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • WBCSD: Eco-efficiency—creating more value with less impact. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • WRI: Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and Human Well-Being. Synthesis. Island Press, World Resources Institute, Washington, DC (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division for Quantitative Sustainability Assessment, Department of Management Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark

    Anders Bjørn & Michael Z. Hauschild

  2. CIRAIG, Polytechnique Montréal, 3333 Chemin Queen-Mary, Montréal, QC, Canada

    Anders Bjørn

Authors
  1. Anders Bjørn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael Z. Hauschild
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anders Bjørn .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark

    Prof. Michael Z. Hauschild

  2. IRSTEA, UMR ITAP, ELSA Research group and ELSA-PACT, Environmental and Social Sustainability Assessment, Montpellier, France

    Dr. Ralph K. Rosenbaum

  3. Department of Management Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark

    Dr. Stig Irving Olsen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bjørn, A., Hauschild, M.Z. (2018). Cradle to Cradle and LCA. In: Hauschild, M., Rosenbaum, R., Olsen, S. (eds) Life Cycle Assessment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56475-3_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56475-3_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56474-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56475-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

search

Navigation