Skip to main content

Part of the book series: International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine ((LIME,volume 73))

  • 156 Accesses

Abstract

Vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) has emerged over the last two decades as a promising therapeutic option for persons who have suffered the loss of limbs or who have suffered major facial disfigurement. While this book will demonstrate familiarity with the technical aspects of VCA, and with a range of ethical issues, its focus will be on the role and structure of consent for this new therapeutic option. In particular, it will argue that the nature and duration of the treatment involved in upper extremity and face transplants makes necessary some modification to the theory and practice of consent. The concept of covenant will be put forward as a resource for this modification. Covenant consent is needed for VCA because it more adequately describes what is being asked of recipients and what is necessary for treatment to succeed. It is also needed because it appropriately honors the recipients by understanding them as active partners rather than as passive patients, as people assuming major burdens and risks while contributing meaningfully to the development of the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Nan D. Hunter, “Rights Talk and Patient Subjectivity: The Role of Autonomy, Equality and Participation Norms,” Wake Forest Law Review 45 (2010): 106; David J. Rothman, “The Origins and Consequences of Patient Autonomy: A 25-Year Retrospective,” Health Care Analysis 9 (2001): 255–264; Mark A. Rothstein, “The Role of Law in the Development of American Bioethics,” Journal international de bioéthique 20, no. 4 (2009): 75; Janet L. Dolgin, “The Legal Development of the Informed Consent Doctrine: Past and Present,” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (2010): 99–100; Bruce Jennings, “Autonomy,” in The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics, ed. by Bonnie Steinbock, (New York: Oxford University Press, 2009), 78–79; Robert M. Veatch, Patient, Heal Thyself: How the New Medicine Puts the Patient in Charge (New York: Oxford University Press, 2009), 57–63; Robert D. Truog, “Patients and Doctors—The Evolution of a Relationship,” The New England Journal of Medicine 366, no. 7 (February 16, 2012): 581; Rosamond Rhodes, “Bioethics: Looking Forward and Looking Back,” The American Journal of Bioethics 13, no. 1 (2013): 13–14.

  2. 2.

    Albert R. Jonsen, The Birth of Bioethics (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998), 196–324; Robert M. Veatch, Amy M. Haddad and Dan C. English, Case Studies in Bioemedical Ethics (New York: Oxford University Press, 2010), xxi–xxii; Rhodes, 13; 15; R. E. McWhirter, “The History of Bioethics: Implications for Current Debates in Health Research,” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 55, no. 3 (Summer 2012): 336; Daniel Callahan, “The Hastings Center and the Early Years of Bioethics,” Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 33 (2012): 12.

  3. 3.

    This is particularly true of the Roman Catholic and Jewish religious traditions. See Jonsen, The Birth of Bioethics, 35–37, Aaron Mackler, Jewish and Catholic Bioethics: A Comparative Analysis (Washington, D. C.: Georgetown University Press, 2003), 1; and Alan L. Mittleman, A Short History of Jewish Ethics (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012), 10–12.

  4. 4.

    Rhodes, 15.

  5. 5.

    Thomas E. Starzl and Clyde Barker, “The Shared Trail of Organ, Limb and Face Transplantation,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 155, no. 1 (March 2011): 1–12; Linda Evans, “A Historical, Clinical and Ethical Overview of the Emerging Science of Facial Transplantation,” Plastic Surgery Nursing 31 (2011): 151–157; Abtin Foroohar et al., “The History and Evolution of Hand Transplantation,” Hand Clinics 27 (2011): 405–409; Jeffrey Levin, “Jewish Ethical Themes That Should Inform the National Healthcare Discussion: A Prolegomenon,” Journal of Religion and Health 51 (2012): 207; Scott M. Tintle et al., “Hand Transplantation,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 2, no. 1 (2014): 2.

  6. 6.

    Chad R. Gordon et al, “The Evolution of Composite Tissue Allotransplantation: the Twentieth Century Realization of ‘Cosmas and Damian,’” in Transplantation of Composite Tissue Allografts, edited by Charles W. Hewitt, W. P. Lee and Chad R. Gordon. (Boston: Springer, 2008), 13–14; K. V. Ravindra et al, “Composite Tissue Transplantation: A Rapidly Advancing Field,” Transplantation Proceedings 40, no. 5 (2008): 1237; Alexis Bergan, “Ancient Myth, Modern Reality: A Brief History of Transplantation,” Journal of Biocommunication 2, no. 4 (1997): 3; Jean-Paul Squifflet, “From Leg Transplantation by St. Cosmas and St. Damian to the Modern Era,” Acta Chirugica Belgica 103, no. 3 (2003): 6; D. Lippi, “The Transplant of the White Man’s Leg: A Novel Representation of Cosma and Damian’s Miracle,” International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology 22, no. 2 (2009): 517–520.

  7. 7.

    Ravindra et al, 1238; Gordon et al, 14.

  8. 8.

    Pedro Infante-Cossio et al, “Facial Transplantation: A Concise Update,” Medicina Oral Patalogίa Oral Y Cirugίa Bucal 18, no. 2 (2013): e263–271; Annemarie Weissenbacher et al, “Vascularized Composite Allografts and Solid Organ Transplants: Similarities and Differences,” Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation 18, no. 6 (2013): 640–644; Christina L. Kaufman et al, “Monitoring Long-term Outcomes in Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation,” Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation 18, no. 6 (2013): 652–658; Maria Siemionow, Bahar Bassiri Gharb and Antonio Rampazzo. “Successes and Lessons Learned after More Than a Decade of Upper Extremity and Face Transplantation,” Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation 18, no. 6 (2013): 633–639; J. R. Diaz-Siso et al, “Vascularized Composite Tissue Allotransplantation—State of the Art,” Clinical Transplantation 27, no. 3 (2013): 330–337.

  9. 9.

    Marina Ninkovic et al, “Functional Outcome after Hand and Forearm Transplantation: What Can Be Achieved?” Hand Clinics 27 (2011): 457–460; Palmina Petruzzo and Jean Michel Dubernard, “World Experience After More Than a Decade of Clinical Hand Transplantation: Update on the French Program,” Hand Clinics 27 (2011): 411–412; Jaime T. Shores, Joseph E. Imbriglia, and W. P. Andrew Lee, “The Current State of Hand Transplantation,” Journal of Hand Surgery 36A (November 2011): 1862; Chenggang Yi and Shuzhong Guo, “Facial Transplantation: Lessons So Far,” The Lancet 374 (2009): 177–78; Maria Siemionow and Can Ozturk, “Face Transplantation: Outcomes, Concerns, Controversies and Future Directions,” The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 23, no. 1 (2012): 254; Joseph E. Losee, Derek R. Fletcher and Vijay S. Gorantla, “Human Facial Allotransplantation: Patient Selection and Pertinent Considerations,” The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 23, no. 1 (2012): 260; Tintle et al, 1; 5–7.

  10. 10.

    Tintle et al, 7; Siemionow, Gharb and Rampazzo, 636–638; Weissenbacher et al, 643; Tae Chong and Timothy L. Pruett, “Evolution of Face Transplant: An Argument for a National Donor Registry,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 132, no. 5 (2013): 1370–1372; Sue V. McDiarmid, “Donor and Procurement Related Issues in Vascularized Composite Allograft Transplantation,” Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation 18, no. 6 (2013): 665–671; David A. Leonard, Josef M. Kurtz and Curtis L. Cetrulo, Jr., “Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation: Towards Tolerance and the Importance of Skin-specific Immunobiology,” Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation 18, no. 6 (2013): 645–651; Matthew J. Carty et al, “The Case for Lower Extremity Allotransplantation,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 131, no. 6 (2013): 1272–1277; Alex Clarke and Peter E. M. Butler, “The Psychological Management of Facial Transplantation,” Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics 9, no. 7 (2009): 1090–1098; L. Allen Furr et al, “Psychosocial Implications of Disfigurement and the Future of Human Face Transplantation,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 120, no. 2 (2007): 559–565; C. Giuglea et al, “Transplantation of Composite Tissue Allografts: Scientific Bases and Clinical Applications,” Journal of Medicine and Life 6, no. 1 (2013): 40–44; Chad R. Gordon et al, “Concomitant Face and Hand Transplantation: Perfect Solution or Perfect Storm?” Annals of Plastic Surgery 67, no. 3 (2011): 309–314; W. C. Huang et al, “Improving the Safety of Tolerance Induction: Chimerism and Cellular Co-treatment Strategies Applied to Vascularized Composite Allografts,” Clinical and Developmental Immunology (2012), epub doi:10.1155/2012/107901; S. E. Jensen et al, “Quality of Life Considerations in Upper Limb Transplantation: Review and Future Directions,” Journal of Hand Surgery 37, no. 10 (2012): 2126–2135; M. M. Klapheke et al, “Psychiatric Assessment of Candidates for Hand Transplantation,” Microsurgery 20, no. 8 (2000): 453–457; L. Lantieri, “A Paradigm Change in Facial Reconstruction,” The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 23, no. 1 (2012): 250–253; Benoit G. Lengele, “Current Concepts and Future Challenges in Facial Transplantation,” Clinics in Plastic Surgery 36, no. 3 (2009): 507–521; D. A. Leonard et al, “Induction of Tolerance in Vascularized Composite Allografts,” Transplantation 95, no. 3 (2013): 403–409; K. Shanmugarajah, S. Hettiaratchy and Peter E. M. Butler, “Facial Transplantation,” Current Opinion in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery 20, no. 4 (2012): 291–297.

  11. 11.

    Ruby Catsanos, Wendy Rogers and Mianna Lotz, “The Ethics of Uterus Transplantation,” Bioethics 27, no. 2 (2013): 65–73; James A. Edwards and David W. Mathes, “Facial Transplantation: A Review of Ethics, Progress and Future Targets,” Transplant Research and Risk Management 3 (2011): 113–125; M. Errico, N. H. Metcalfe and A. Platt, “History and Ethics of Hand Transplants,” JRSM Short Reports 10 (2012): 74; S. E. Johnson and M. J. Corsten, “Facial Transplantation in a New Era: What are the Ethical Implications?” Current Opinion in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery 17, no. 4 (2009): 274–278; L. K. Kalliainen, “Supporting Facial Transplantation with the Pillars of Bioethics,” Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery 26, no. 8 (2010): 547–554; H. O’Neill and D. Godden, “Ethical Issues of Facial Transplantation,” British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 47, no. 6 (2009): 443–445; A. Renshaw et al, “Informed Consent for Facial Transplantation,” Transplant International 19, no. 11 (2006): 861–867; Maria Siemionow, “Ethical Considerations in Face Transplantation: Ethical Issues Related to Inclusion Criteria for Face Transplant Candidates,” Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis 59, no. 3 (2011): 157–159; C. Strong, “An On-going Issue Concerning Facial Transplantation,” American Journal of Transplantation 10, no. 5 (2010): 1115–1116; C. J. Vercler, “Ethical Issues in Face Transplantation,” Virtual Mentor 12, no. 5 (2010): 378–382; Samuel Taylor-Alexander, “Facial Transplantation: Ethical Slippage and Quiet Death in Experimental Biomedicine,” Anthropology Today 29, no. 1 (2013): 13–16; Harriet Kiwanuka et al, “Evolution of Ethical Debate on Face Transplantation,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 132, no. 6 (2013): 1558–1568.

  12. 12.

    Starzl and Barker, 1–12; Evans, 151–157; Abtin Foroohar et al, 405–409; Tintle et al, 1.

  13. 13.

    T. Hautz et al, “How Reconstructive Transplantation is Different from Organ Transplantation—And How It Is Not,” Transplantation Proceedings 43 (2011): 3504–3509; Shanmugarajah, Hettiaratchy, and Butler, 294–295; Shores, Imbriglia and Lee, 1864–1865; P. Petruzzo et al, “Long-Term Follow-up in Composite Tissue Allotransplantation: In-Depth Study of Five (Hand and Face) Recipients,” American Journal of Transplantation 11 (2011): 810; Anne Hodges, Steve Chesher and Sandra Feranda, “Hand Transplantation: Rehabilitation: Case Report,” Microsurgery 20 (2000): 389–392; Tintle et al, 2; Weissenbacher et al, 643; Kaufman et al 653–654; Brooke M. Lamparello et al, “Face Time: Educating Face Transplant Candidates,” Eplasty (2013): 278–279.

  14. 14.

    Tom L. Beauchamp and James F. Childress, Principles of Biomedical Ethics 6th Edition (New York: Oxford University Press, 2009), 117–140.

  15. 15.

    Neil C. Manson and Onora O'Neill, Rethinking Informed Consent in Bioethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), 68–96.

  16. 16.

    Bernard Gert, Charles M. Culver and K. Danner Clouser, Bioethics: A Systematic Approach, 2nd Edition, New York: Oxford University Press, 2006, 21–50 and 191–282.

  17. 17.

    Franklin G. Miller and Alan Wertheimer, “Preface to a Theory of Consent Transactions: Beyond Valid Consent,” The Ethics of Consent: Theory and Practice (New York: Oxford University Press, 2010), 79–106; Franklin G. Miller and Alan Wertheimer, “The Fair Transaction Model of Informed Consent: An Alternative to Autonomous Authorization,” Kennedy Institute of Ethics 21, no. 3 (2011): 201–218; Alan Wertheimer, “Voluntary Consent: Why A Value-Neutral Concept Won’t Work,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37, no. 3 (June 2012): 4.

  18. 18.

    Jaime S. King and Benjamin Moulton, “Rethinking Informed Consent: The Case for Shared Medical Decision-Making,” American Journal of Law and Medicine 32 (2006): 429–501; William J. Sieber and Robert M. Kaplan, “Informed Adherence: The Need for Shared Medical Decision Making,” Controlled Clinical Trials 21 (2000): 234S–240S.

  19. 19.

    P. Allmark and S. Mason, “Improving the Quality of Consent to Randomised Controlled Trials by Using Continuous Consent and Clinician Training in the Consent Process,” Journal of Medical Ethics 32, no. 8 (2006): 239–443; William Smith et al, “Empirical Evaluation of the Need for ‘On-going Consent’ in Clinical Research,” AIDS 25 (2011): 107–114; Gert Helgesson and Stefan Eriksson, “Does Informed Consent Have an Expiry Date?” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (2011): 85–92; Kristen J. Prentice et al, “Maintaining Informed Consent Validity During Lengthy Research Protocols,” IRB: Ethics and Human Research 29, no. 6 (November 2007): 1–6; Mary Rose Mueller and Susan Instone, “Beyond the Informed Consent Procedure: Continuing Consent in Human Research,” Ciência e Saúde Coletiva 13, no. 2 (March–April 2008): 381–389.

  20. 20.

    Hainan Zhu et al, “Invited Review: Perioperative Risk Factors for Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation: A Systematic Review and Proposal of Identity-Defining VCA,” Microsurgery 2013 Jul 9. doi:10.1002/micr.22125.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James L. Benedict .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Benedict, J.L. (2017). Introduction. In: A Revised Consent Model for the Transplantation of Face and Upper Limbs: Covenant Consent. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 73. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56400-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics