Advertisement

Life After the Fact(ory): Pedagogy of Care at an Animal Sanctuary

  • Christopher BentleyEmail author
  • Steve Alsop
Chapter
Part of the Environmental Discourses in Science Education book series (EDSE, volume 2)

Abstract

This chapter explores pedagogical possibilities of a farmed animal sanctuary in rural Ontario, Canada. We conceive this sanctuary as a place where “species meet” (Haraway DJ, When species meet (Posthumanities). University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 2007) and renew their relationships and understandings with one another. It is a place where we like to think new, multispecies relationships can take shape and evolve as individuals learn together. The sanctuary also provides educators opportunities to think about and perform science education in different, non-traditional ways - as forms of multispecies education and caregiving. We observe evolving relationships with individual farmed animals in the stories and storytellings that make up the sanctuary’s pedagogy. Along the way, we remain open and sensitive to new understandings of animals, our sciences, and our educations. With this stance, we concur with many environmental educators who advocate the central importance of education shaping and nurturing relationships with non-humans, within our shared organic world.

Keywords

Animal studies Science education Multispecies Storytelling Pedagogy 

References

  1. Akbarsha, M. A., Zeeshan, M., & Meenakumari, K. J. (2013). Alternatives to animals in education, research, and risk assessment: An overview with special reference to indian context. Proceedings of Animal Alternatives in Teaching, Toxicity Testing and Medicine. Retrieved from http://altweb.jhsph.edu/altex/proceedings/2_1/akbarsha2.pdf
  2. Alsop, S., & Dillon J. (forthcoming) Encounters with a narwhal: Revitalising science education’s capacity to affect and be affected. In Corrigan, D. Jones, A, & Gunstone, D. (Eds.), Navigating the changing landscape of formal and informal science learning opportunities. Dordrecht: Springer Press.Google Scholar
  3. Archibald, J.-A. (2008). Indigenous Storywork: Educating the heart, mind, body, and spirit. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
  4. Birke, L., & Hockenhull, J. (Eds.). (2012). Crossing boundaries: Investigating human-animal relationships. Boston: Brill Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Boggs, C. G. (2013). Animalia Americana: Animal representations and Biopolitical subjectivity. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cotroneo, C. (2013, September 26). Yoda The Piglet Escapes Slaughterhouse, Finds Love. Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2013/09/26/yoda-piglet-slaughterhouse-escape-_n_3994994.html
  7. Despret, V. (2010). Sheep do have opinions. Retrieved March 23, 2016, from Vinciane Despret, http://www.vincianedespret.be/2010/04/sheep-do-have-opinions/
  8. Edwards, A., Bird, F. L., Jones, S. M., & Parry, L. J. (2014). Enhancing learning through the use of animals in undergraduate biology teaching: The student voice. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education (formerly CAL-laborate International), 22(2), 35–54. Retrieved from http://openjournals.library.usyd.edu.au/index.php/CAL/article/view/7120/8362
  9. Emel, J., & Wolch, J. (1998). Witnessing the animal moment. In J. R. Wolch & J. Emel (Eds.), Animal geographies: Place, politics, and identity in the nature-culture borderlands (pp. 1–23). London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
  10. Keller, F., & Evelyn. (1984). A feeling for the organism: The life and work of Barbara McClintock (10th ed.). San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
  11. Frank, A. W. (1995). The wounded storyteller: Body, illness and ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frank, A. W. (2012). Letting stories breathe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Fraser, D., Weary, D. M., & von Keyserlingk, M. A. G. (2010). In M. DeMello (Ed.), Teaching the animal: Human-animal studies across the disciplines (pp. 341–365). New York: Lantern Books, US.Google Scholar
  14. Friedmann, H. (1955). The honey-guides. U.S. National Museum Bulletin, 208, 1–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Genovesi, J. S. (2011). An exploratory study of a new educational method using live animals and visual thinking strategies for natural science teaching in museums. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
  16. Haraway, D. J. (2007). When species meet (Posthumanities). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  17. Haraway, D. (2015). Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Chthulucene: Making Kin. Environmental Humanities, 6, 159–165. Available at http://environmentalhumanities.org/arch/vol6/6.7.pdf
  18. Hummel, E., & Randler, C. (2011). Living animals in the classroom: A meta-analysis on learning outcome and a Treatment–Control study focusing on knowledge and motivation. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(1), 95–105. doi: 10.1007/s10956-011-9285-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. de La Bellacasa, M. P. (2012). ‘Nothing comes without its world’: Thinking with care. The Sociological Review, 60(2), 197–216. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954x.2012.02070.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Laland, K. N. (2008). Animal cultures. Current Biology, 18(9), R366–R370. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.02.049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Latimer, J., & Birke, L. (2009). Natural relations: Horses, knowledge, technology. The Sociological Review, 57(1), 1–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954x.2008.01802.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Massumi, B. (2014). What animals teach us about politics. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McHugh, S. (2011). Animal stories: Narrating across species lines. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mol, A., Moser, I., & Pols, J. (2010). Care in practice: On tinkering in clinics, homes and farms. In A. Mol, I. Moser, & J. Pols (Eds.), Care in practice: On tinkering in clinics, homes and farms. Transcript Verlag: Bielefeld.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mueller, M., Pattillo, K.K., Mitchell, D., & Luther, R.A. (2011). Lessons from the tree that owns itself: Implications for education. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 6(3), 293–314. doi:10.12973ijese.2011.117.Google Scholar
  26. Noske, B. (1997). Beyond boundaries: Humans and animals. Montreal: Black Rose Books.Google Scholar
  27. Pedersen, H. (2008). Learning to measure the value of life? Animal experimentation, pedagogy, and (Eco)Feminist critique. In R. Sollund (Ed.), Global harms: Ecological crime and speciesism (pp. 131–150). New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  28. Pedersen, H. (2010). Animals in schools: Processes and strategies in human-animal education. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Philo, C., & Wilbert, C. (2000). Animal spaces, beastly places: An introduction. In C. Philo & C. Wilbert (Eds.), Animal spaces, beastly places: New geographies of human-animal relations (pp. 1–34). London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  30. Regan, T. (1983). The case for animal rights. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  31. Rice, S., & Rud, A. G. (2015). Introduction. In S. Rice & A. G. Rud (Eds.), The educational significance of human and non-human animal interactions: Blurring the species line (pp. 1–12). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  32. Rowe, B. (2015). Challenging anthropocentrism in education: Posthumanist intersectionality and eating animals as gastro-aesthetic pedagogy. In S. Rice & A. G. Rud (Eds.), The educational significance of human and non-human animal interactions: Blurring the species line (pp. 131–150). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  33. Singer, P. (2001). Animal liberation. New York: Avon Books (P).Google Scholar
  34. Spottiswoode, C. N., Begg, K. S., & Begg, C. M. (2016). Reciprocal signaling in honeyguide-human mutualism. Science, 353(6297), 387–389. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf4885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Taylor, N. (2012). Animals, Mess, Method: Post-humanism, Sociology, and Animal Studies. In L. Birke & J. Hockenhull (Eds.), Crossing boundaries: Investigating human-animal relationships (pp. 37–50). Boston: Brill Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tsing, A. L. (2015). The mushroom at the end of the world: On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Weaver, H. (2012). Pedagogy and the ‘Animal Turn’: A Workshop. Retrieved March 19, 2016, from Centre for Science, Technology, Medicine and Society, University of California, Berkeley, http://cstms.berkeley.edu/current-events/pedagogy-and-the-animal-turn-a-workshop/
  38. Weil, Z. (2004). The power and promise of humane education. New York: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
  39. Wemelsfelder, F. (2012). A science of friendly pigs... Carving out a conceptual space for addressing animals as sentient beings. In L. Birke, & J. Hockenhull (Eds.), Crossing boundaries: Investigating human-animal relationships (pp. 223–250). Leiden: Brill Academic Pub.Google Scholar
  40. White, E.B. (1948, January). Death of a Pig. The Atlantic. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1948/01/death-pig/309203/
  41. Wilhelm, T. (2013, July 12). Cruelty officers discover dozens of dead and starving farm animals. Windsor Star. Retrieved from http://windsorstar.com/news/cruelty-officers-discover-dozens-of-dead-and-starving-farm-animals
  42. Woodward, W. (2008). The animal gaze: Animal Subjectivities in southern African narratives. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Yip, D. Y. (2000). Bringing life back to the biology laboratory — investigations with mealworms. Journal of Biological Education, 34(2), 101–104. doi: 10.1080/00219266.2000.9655694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationYork UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations