Advertisement

Socio-scientific Issues for Scientific Literacy – The Evolution of an Environmental Education Program with a Focus on Birds

  • Andrew T. KinslowEmail author
  • Troy D. Sadler
Chapter
Part of the Environmental Discourses in Science Education book series (EDSE, volume 2)

Abstract

Students can relate with birds in a variety of contexts, from casual observations of birds in the schoolyard to keeping birds as pets or engaging in bird identification. In this chapter, we describe the evolution of an environmental education program for high school students that has used ornithology as an organizing theme. A central component of the program is student participation in a bird banding research program. Initially, the program adopted a relatively simple citizen science model: students collected data on birds, following protocols provided by ornithology researchers, and then submitted their findings to a national database. An early modification to the program was the addition of water quality monitoring at the site of the avian field research. The latest innovations involve incorporating citizen science activities related to birds and water within a broader socio-scientific issues (SSI) approach. This chapter will describe and document ways in which this shift from stand-alone citizen science projects to a coherently framed SSI-based learning experience enhanced the extent to which the program met its ultimate goals for student learning including development of scientific literacy in a derived and progressive sense.

Keywords

Socio-scientific issues (SSI) Scientific literacy Citizen science Public Participation in Scientific Research (PPSR) Environmental education 

Supplementary material

References

  1. ABA. (2015). American Birding Association Young Birders. Retrieved from http://youngbirders.aba.org/
  2. Barab, S., Sadler, T., Heiselt, C., Hickey, D., & Zuiker, S. (2010). Erratum to: Relating Narrative, Inquiry, and Inscriptions: Supporting Consequential Play. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(4), 387–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonney, R., Ballard, H., Jordan, R., McCallie, E., Phillips, T., Shirk, J., & Wilderman, C. C. (2009). Public participation in scientific research: Defining the field and assessing its potential for informal science education (A CAISE Inquiry Group Report).Google Scholar
  4. Burgin, S. R., & Sadler, T. D. (2016). Learning nature of science concepts through a research apprenticeship program: A comparative study of three approaches. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(1), 31–59.Google Scholar
  5. Burgin, S. R., Sadler, T. D., & Koroly, M. J. (2012). High school student participation in scientific research apprenticeships: Variation in and relationships among student experiences and outcomes. Research in Science Education, 42(3), 439–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clements, J. F. (2007). The Clements checklist of birds of the world (6th ed.). Ithaca: Comstock Pub. Associates/Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cooper, C. B. (2012). Links and distinctions among citizenship, science, and citizen science. Democracy & Education, 20(2), 1–4.Google Scholar
  8. Dawson, V., Carson, K., & Venville, G. (2010). Genetics curriculum materials for the 21st century. Teaching Science: The Journal of the Australian Science Teachers Association, 56(4), 38.Google Scholar
  9. DeSante, D. F., Burton, K. M., Velez, P, Froehlich, D., & Kaschube, D. (2008). MAPS Manual: Instructions for the establishment and operation of constant-effort bird-banding stations as part of the monitoring avian productivity and survivorship (MAPS) program.Google Scholar
  10. Dickinson, J. L., Shirk, J., Bonter, D., Bonney, R., Crain, R. L., Martin, J., et al. (2012). The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6), 291–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dori, Y. J., Tal, R. T., & Tsaushu, M. (2003). Teaching biotechnology through case studies—can we improve higher order thinking skills of nonscience majors? Science Education, 87(6), 767–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. eBird. (2015). Young Birders Network. Retrieved from http://ebird.org/content/ybn/
  13. Feldman, A., Divoll, K. A., & Rogan-Klyve, A. (2013). Becoming researchers: The participation of undergraduate and graduate students in scientific research groups. Science Education, 97(2), 218–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Flatness, B. (2007). Field Research Emblem (pp. Student Artwork).Google Scholar
  15. Friedrichsen, P., Sadler, T. D., Graham, K., & Brown, P. (2016). Design of a socio-scientific issue curriculum unit: Antibiotic resistance, natural selection, and modeling. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 7(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
  16. Gray, S. A., Nicosia, K., & Jordan, R. C. (2012). Lessons learned from citizen science in the classroom. Democracy & Education, 20(2), 1–5.Google Scholar
  17. Khishfe, R., & Lederman, N. (2006). Teaching nature of science within a controversial topic: Integrated versus nonintegrated. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), 395–418.Google Scholar
  18. Klosterman, M. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2010). Multi-level assessment of scientific content knowledge gains associated with socioscientific issues-based instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 32(8), 1017–1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Latta, S. C., Marshall, L. C., Frantz, M. W., & Toms, J. D. (2015). Evidence from two shale regions that a riparian songbird accumulates metals associated with hydraulic fracturing. Ecosphere, 6(9), art144.Google Scholar
  20. Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831–880). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  21. Lewis, J., & Leach, J. (2006). Discussion of socio-scientific issues: The role of science knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 28(11), 1267–1287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. MDC. (2007). Stream Team Volunteer Water Quality Monitoring. Retrieved from http://www.mostreamteam.org/vwqm.asp
  23. Mueller, M., Tippins, D., & Bryan, L. (2012). The future of citizen science. Democracy & Education, 20(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
  24. Oberhauser, K., & LeBuhn, G. (2012). Insects and plants: Engaging undergraduates in authentic research through citizen science. Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, 10(6), 318–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Presley, M. L., Sickel, A. J., Muslu, N., Merle-Johnson, D., Witzig, S. B., Izci, K., & Sadler, T. D. s. m. e. (2013). A framework for socio-scientific issues based education. Science Educator, 22(1), 26–32.Google Scholar
  26. Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy/science literacy. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 729–780). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  27. Roberts, D. A., & Bybee, R. W. (2014). Scientific literacy, science literacy, and science education. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (2nd ed., pp. 545–558). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Ryder, J., & Leach, J. (1999). University science students’ experiences of investigative project work and their images of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 945–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sadler, T. D. (2011). Socioscientific issues-based education: What we know about science education in the context of SSI. In T. D. Sadler (Ed.), Soci-scientific issues in science classrooms: Teaching, learning and research (pp. 277–306). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sadler, T. D., Burgin, S., McKinney, L., & Ponjuan, L. (2010). Learning science through research apprenticeships: A critical review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(3), 235–256.Google Scholar
  31. Sadler, T. D., Chambers, F. W., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). Student conceptualizations of the nature of science in response to a socioscientific issue.International Journal of Science Education, 26(4), 387–409.Google Scholar
  32. Sadler, T.D., Klosterman, M., & Topcu, M. (2011). Learning science content and socio-scientific reasoning through classroom explorations of global climate change. In T. D. Sadler (Ed.), Socio-scientific issues in the classroom (Vol. 39, pp. 45–77). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  33. Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. (2009). Scientific literacy, PISA, and socioscientific discourse: Assessment for progressive aims of science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 909–921.Google Scholar
  34. Schwab, J. J., & Brandwein, P. F. (1962). The Teaching of science: The teaching of science as enquiry (Vol. 1961). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Crawford, B. A. (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88(4), 610–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stake, J. E., & Mares, K. R. (2005). Evaluating the impact of science-enrichment programs on adolescents’ science motivation and confidence: The splashdown effect. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(4), 359–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Strycker, N. (2012). A Birding Interview with Chandler S. Robbins. Birding, 44, 16–21.Google Scholar
  38. USFWS. (2013). 2011 National survey of fishing, hunting, and wildlife-associated recreation; 2013 Google Scholar
  39. White, B., Frederiksen, J., & Collins, A. (2009). The interplay of scientific inquiry and metacognition: More than a marriage of convenience. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 175–205). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  40. Wiggins, A., & Crowston, K. (2012, January 4–7). Goals and tasks: Two typologies of citizen science projects. Paper presented at the System Science (HICSS), 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference.Google Scholar
  41. Zeidler, D. (2014). Socioscientific issues as a curriculum emphasis: Theory, research and practice. In S. K. A. N. G. Lederman (Ed.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 697–726). New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  42. Zeidler, D., Sadler, T. D., Applebaum, S., & Callahan, B. E. (2009). Advancing reflective judgment through socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 74–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students’ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The ReSTEM Institute College of EducationUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations