Advertisement

Many Kinds of Kindness: The Relationship Between Values and Prosocial Behaviour

  • Rebecca SandersonEmail author
  • Jamie McQuilkin
Chapter

Abstract

A prosocial behaviour is an act that benefits other people or society. The understanding of what actually benefits people is contested both within and between cultures. We address this by exploring and debating some different ways that “prosocial” can be construed—as everyday kindness, political activism, pro-environmental behaviour and participation in organised groups that work in the interest of others. We review the connection between values and these behaviours, finding that Self-Transcendence is consistently positively related while Self-Enhancement, and within it particularly Power, is often negatively associated with behaviours that are perceived as prosocial.

References

  1. Arieli, S., Grant, A. M., & Sagiv, L. (2014). Convincing yourself to care about others: An intervention for enhancing benevolence values. Journal of Personality, 82(1), 15–24. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12029.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bardi, A., & Schwartz, S. H. (2003). Values and behavior: Strength and structure of relations. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 29(10), 1207-1220.Google Scholar
  3. Bauer, M. A., Wilkie, J. E. B., Kim, J. K., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2012). Cuing consumerism: situational materialism undermines personal and social well-being. Psychological Science, 23(5), 517–523. doi: 10.1177/0956797611429579.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bolderdijk, J. W., Steg, L., Geller, E. S., Lehman, P. K., & Postmes, T. (2012). Comparing the effectiveness of monetary versus moral motives in environmental campaigning. Nature Climate Change, 3(4), 413–416. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Collins, C. M., Steg, L., & Koning, M. A. S. (2007). Customers’ values, beliefs on sustainable corporate performance, and buying behavior. Psychology and Marketing, 24(6), 555–577. doi: 10.1002/mar.20173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Daniel, E., Bilgin, A. S., Brezina, I., Strohmeier, C. E., & Vainre, M. (2015). Values and helping behavior: A study in four cultures. International Journal of Psychology, 50(3), 186–192. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12086.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. de Groot, J. I. M., & Steg, L. (2008). Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior: How to measure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations. Environment and Behavior, 40(3), 330–354. doi: 10.1177/0013916506297831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. de Groot, J. I. M., & Steg, L. (2009). Mean or green: Which values can promote stable pro-environmental behavior? Conservation Letters, 2(2), 61–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2009.00048.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Engqvist Jonsson, A.-K., & Nilsson, A. (2014). Exploring the relationship between values and pro-environmental behaviour: The influence of locus of control. Environmental Values, 23(3), 297–314. doi: 10.3197/096327114X13947900181752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Evans, L. H., Maio, G. R., Corner, A. J., Hodgetts, C. J., Ahmed, S., & Hahn, U. (2012). Self-Interest and pro-environmental behaviour. Nature Climate Change, 3(2), 122–125. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Feldman, G., Chao, M. M., Farh, J.-L., & Bardi, A. (2015). The motivation and inhibition of breaking the rules: Personal values structures predict unethicality. Journal of Research in Personality, 59, 69–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2015.09.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hafner-Fink, M. (2012). Political participation, democratisation and citizens’ values in Europe. Teorija in Praksa, 49(3), 544–565.Google Scholar
  13. Kajonius, P. J., Persson, B. N., & Jonason, P. K. (2015). Hedonism, achievement, and power: Universal values that characterize the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 77, 173–178. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.12.055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kalof, L., Dietz, T., Stern, P. C., & Guagnano, G. A. (1999). Social psychological and structural influences on vegetarian beliefs. Rural Sociology, 64(3), 500–511. doi: 10.1111/j.1549-0831.1999.tb00364.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Karp, D. G. (1996). Values and their effect on pro-environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 28(1), 111–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Knafo, A., Daniel, E., & Khoury-Kassabri, M. (2008). Values as protective factors against violent behavior in Jewish and Arab high schools in Israel. Child Development, 79(3), 652–667. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01149.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Liberman, V., Samuels, S. M., & Ross, L. (2004). The name of the game: Predictive power of reputations versus situational labels in determining prisoner’s dilemma game moves. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(9), 1175–1185. doi: 10.1177/0146167204264004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Maio, G. R., Pakizeh, A., Cheung, W.-Y., & Rees, K. J. (2009). Changing, priming, and acting on values: Effects via motivational relations in a circular model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(4), 699–715. doi: 10.1037/a0016420.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Nordlund, A. M., & Garvill, J. (2002). Value structures behind proenvironmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 34(6), 740–756. doi: 10.1177/001391602237244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pacheco, G., & Owen, B. (2015). Moving through the political participation hierarchy: A focus on personal values.Applied Economics, 47(3),222–238. doi:  10.1080/00036846.2014.967384.
  21. Paciello, M., Muratori, P., Ruglioni, L., Milone, A., Buonanno, C., Capo, R., et al. (2015). Personal values and moral disengagement promote aggressive and rule-breaking behaviours in adolescents with disruptive behaviour disorders: A pilot study. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. doi: 10.1177/0306624X15589593.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Paharia, N., Vohs, K. D., & Deshpandé, R. (2013). Sweatshop labor is wrong unless the shoes are cute: Cognition can both help and hurt moral motivated reasoning. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121(1), 81–88. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.01.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Parks-Leduc, L., Feldman, G., & Bardi, A. (2015). Personality traits and personal values: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19(1), 3–29. doi: 10.1177/1088868314538548.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Poortinga, W., Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2004). Values, environmental concern, and environmental behavior: A study into household energy use. Environment and Behavior, 36(1), 70–93. doi: 10.1177/0013916503251466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pulfrey, C., & Butera, F. (2013). Why neoliberal values of self-enhancement lead to cheating in higher education: A motivational account. Psychological Science, 24(11), 2153–2162. doi: 10.1177/0956797613487221.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Reutner, L., & Wänke, M. (2013). For my own benefit or for the benefit of others: Reminders of money moderate the effects of self-related versus other-related persuasive arguments. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(2), 220–223. doi: 10.1177/1948550612450052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Roets, A., Cornelis, I., & Van Hiel, A. (2014). Openness as a predictor of political orientation and conventional and unconventional political activism in Western and Eastern Europe. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96(1), 53–63. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2013.809354.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Rokeach, M., & McLellan, D. D. (1972). Feedback of information about the values and attitudes of self and others as determinants of long-term cognitive and behavioral change. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2(3), 236–251. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1972.tb01275.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sabucedo, J. M., & Arce, C. (1991). Types of political participation: A multidimensional analysis. European Journal of Political Research, 20(1), 93–102. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.1991.tb00257.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schultz, P. W., & Zelezny, L. C. (1998). Values and proenvironmental behavior: A five-country survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29(4), 540–558. doi: 10.1177/0022022198294003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schwartz, S. H. (2007). Universalism values and the inclusiveness of our moral universe. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38(6), 711–728. doi: 10.1177/0022022107308992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schwartz, S. H. (2010). Basic values: How they motivate and inhibit prosocial behaviour. In M. Mikulincer & P. Shaver (Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature (pp. 221–241). Washington: American Psychological Association Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schwartz, S. H., & Bardi, A. (2001). Value hierarchies across cultures: Taking a similarities perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(3), 268–290. doi: 10.1177/0022022101032003002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Fischer, R., Beierlein, C., et al. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(4), 663–688. doi: 10.1037/a0029393.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Shafer, W. E., Fukukawa, K., & Lee, G. M. (2007). Values and the perceived importance of ethics and social responsibility: The U.S. versus China. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(3), 265–284. doi: 10.1007/s10551-006-9110-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shweder, R., Much, N., Mahapatra, M., & Park, L. (1997). The “Big Three” of morality (autonomy, community, divinity) and the “Big Three” explanations of suffering. In A. M. Brandt & P. Rozin (Eds.), Morality and health (pp. 119–169). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Singer, P. (1972). Famine, affluence, and morality. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 1(3), 229–243.Google Scholar
  38. Steg, L., & de Groot, J. I. M. (2012). Environmental values. In S. Clayton (Ed.), Oxford handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 81–92). New York: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199733026.013.0005.Google Scholar
  39. Steg, L., Perlaviciute, G., van der Werff, E., & Lurvink, J. (2014). The significance of hedonic values for environmentally relevant attitudes, preferences, and actions. Environment and Behavior, 46(2), 163–192. doi: 10.1177/0013916512454730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1994). The value basis of environmental concern. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology, 6(2), 81–97.Google Scholar
  43. Sverdlik, N., Roccas, S., & Sagiv, L. (2012). Morality across cultures: A value perspective. In The social psychology of morality: Exploring the cause of good and evil (pp. 219–235).Google Scholar
  44. Thøgersen, J., & Crompton, T. (2009). Simple and Painless? The limitations of spillover in environmental campaigning. Journal of Consumer Policy, 32(2), 141–163. doi: 10.1007/s10603-009-9101-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Truelove, H. B., Carrico, A. R., Weber, E. U., Raimi, K. T., & Vandenbergh, M. P. (2014). Positive and negative spillover of pro-environmental behavior: An integrative review and theoretical framework. Global Environmental Change, 29, 127–138. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.09.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Twenge, J. M., Baumeister, R. F., DeWall, C. N., Ciarocco, N. J., & Bartels, J. M. (2007). Social exclusion decreases prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 56–66. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. van der Meer, T. W. G., & van Ingen, E. J. (2009). Schools of democracy? Disentangling the relationship between civic participation and political action in 17 European countries. European Journal of Political Research, 48(2), 281–308. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2008.00836.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vecchione, M., Schwartz, S. H., Caprara, G. V., Schoen, H., Cieciuch, J., Silvester, J., et al. (2015). Personal values and political activism: A cross-national study. British Journal of Psychology, 106(1), 84–106. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12067.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Verplanken, B., & Holland, R. W. (2002). Motivated decision making: Effects of activation and self-centrality of values on choices and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(3), 434–447. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.82.3.434.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Vohs, K. D., Mead, N. L., & Goode, M. R. (2006). The psychological consequences of money. Science, 314(5802), 1154–1156. doi: 10.1126/science.1132491.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Vohs, K. D., Mead, N. L., & Goode, M. R. (2008). Merely activating the concept of money changes personal and interpersonal behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(3), 208–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wade-Benzoni, K. A., Hernandez, M., Medvec, V., & Messick, D. (2008). In fairness to future generations: The role of egocentrism, uncertainty, power, and stewardship in judgments of intergenerational allocations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(2), 233–245. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2007.04.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Watson, G. W., & Berkley, R. A. (2009). Testing the value-pragmatics hypothesis in unethical compliance. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(4), 463–476. doi: 10.1007/s10551-008-9953-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Watson, G. W., Berkley, R. A., & Papamarcos, S. D. (2009). Ambiguous allure: The value-pragmatics model of ethical decision making. Business and Society Review, 114(1), 1–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8594.2009.00333.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Public Interest Research CentreMachynllethUK

Personalised recommendations